Santos vs Remo: match statistics
Santos vs Remo: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Santos played against Remo in Serie A (Brazil). The game was played on April 2, 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Recent form
Santos has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Remo has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Santos scores 1.25 goals per game and allows 1.63. Remo scores 1.25 and allows 1.88. Games in this league average 2.67 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 88% of Santos's games and 50% of Remo's. The Over 2.5 rates are 63% and 50%, compared with league averages of 58% for BTTS and 47% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Remo has the higher season xG average, 1.38 to 1.29 per game. Santos takes 12.3 shots per game, while Remo takes 13.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Santos leads at halftime in 13% of its games and scores 0.63 goals per game after halftime. Remo leads at halftime in 13% and scores 0.63 after halftime.
When the teams score
Santos's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (3 goals). For Remo, it is minutes 31-45+ (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Serie A games average 2.67 goals. Both teams score in 58% of games, and 47% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the home win (1): Santos have scored 7 goals in their last 5 home matches and average 1.6 points per game, whereas Remo have scored 4 goals in that period and average only 0.8 pts per game. Santos sit 16th in the table and Remo 18th, confirming a marginal home advantage across the season. At home Santos average 1.25 goals from 10.5 shots and 3 shots on target per game with a 12% conversion rate, while Remo away average just 0.75 goals from 13.25 shots and a 6% conversion, indicating low visiting efficiency. Defensively Remo concede 2.25 goals on average away (xG against 1.57), whereas Santos concede 1.25 at home (xG against 1.32), so the hosts are more stable at the back. Additionally Remo have recorded no away wins (win% 0) and have been goalless in 75% of their away matches, while Santos have 0% home matches without scoring, which further increases the hosts’ chances of victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Santos presents a very strong BTTS signal — seasonal BTTS rate 75% and 80% in the last 5 matches, while Remo has only 25% for the season and 20% in the last 5; the league shows BTTS at 56%. Santos’ attack is efficient: 1.75 goals at home on average and xG 1.54, with 6.75 shots on target per match and a 13% conversion rate, while Remo concedes 2.25 goals on average away, so the hosts have a high chance to score. Remo generates xG ≈1.22 (1.29 in the last 5) but on the season they score only 0.75 goals away (0.8 in the last 5), with 2.25 shots on target and 6% conversion, which reduces their likelihood of scoring but does not eliminate it entirely. Additionally, Santos concedes on average 1.5 goals in the season and 1.2 in the last 5 matches, and the home clean sheet rate is 0%, indicating defensive vulnerability to conceding. Considering Santos’ strong BTTS signal (75–80%), Remo’s low finishing but xG ≈1.2, and Santos’ susceptibility to conceding, I assess BTTS probability at 68% vs 32% and recommend the "yes" (BTTS - Yes) bet.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG and defensive data I estimate total expected goals at 2.90: Santos 1.56 (Santos xG 1.54 vs xG conceded by Remo 1.57) and Remo 1.34 (Remo xG 1.22 vs xG conceded by Santos 1.45). Santos averages 1.75 goals per match and records 6.75 shots on target, while Remo posts 0.75 goals and 2.25 shots on target; Santos’s higher conversion rate 13% vs Remo 6% suggests an advantage in turning chances into goals. Historical indicators support the Over: Santos has 100% of matches with over 1.5 goals this season, Remo 75%, both teams have 50% of matches with over 2.5 goals, and in the last 5 fixtures Santos had Over 2.5 in 60% of cases. A Poisson model with mean λ=2.90 shows probability of Over 1.5 ≈79%, Over 2.5 ≈55% and Over 3.5 ≈33%, which is above the league average Over 2.5 of 45% and confirms an increased likelihood of goals. Therefore I recommend a bet on Over 1.5 (line 1.5) as the strongest signal: Santos’s high historical frequency (100% Over 1.5) plus the projected 2.90 goals give an estimated edge for the Over of about 79%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Santos holds a clear offensive advantage: they score an average of 1.75 goals per game versus Remo’s 0.75, have xG of 1.54 compared to 1.22, register 6.75 shots on target against the visitors’ 2.25, and their conversion rate is 13% vs 6%. At Half-Time draws are prevalent — home side average 1.0 goal by the break, visitors 0.25; hosts led at the break in 25% of season matches, but in the last five fixtures Santos were level at Half-Time in 80% of cases. After the break the situation favors the hosts: Remo concedes on average 1.5 goals in the second half while Santos score 0.75 after Half-Time, creating a realistic chance for a turnaround in favor of Santos following an HT draw. Given the above, the most likely scenario is a draw at Half-Time and a home win (X/1) — my pick, assigned a 30% probability. The second most likely outcome is draw-draw (X/X) at 20%, and the combined probability of a Remo win in the model is only 11% (scenarios 1/2, X/2, 2/2).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Santos | Remo | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 26% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.10 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.40 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Santos is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - Santos · 0.8 pts / game - Remo
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Santos is 15% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.63 goals / game - Santos · 1.88 goals / game - Remo
Santos scores in 88% of games (7 of 8 meczów), while Remo keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 8 meczów).
Remo scores in 50% of games (4 of 8 meczów), while Santos keeps a clean sheet in 13% (1 of 8 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Santos
Over / Under - Remo
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Santos is 28% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.13 pts / game - Santos · 0.88 pts / game - Remo
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Santos - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 13% of games and wins 13%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Remo - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 13% of games and wins 13%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -3 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Santos
Remo
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie A).
Teams vs league
| Santos | Liga | Remo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.88 | 2.67 | ▲ 3.13 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 88% | 58% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 63% | 47% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 13% | 22% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 75% | 81% | ▲ 88% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 75% | 72% | ▲ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Santos vs Remo?
The Serie A match finished Santos 2:0 Remo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Santos vs Remo?
Santos score 1.25 goals per game on average and Remo 1.25. The Serie A average is 2.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 88% of Santos's matches and 50% of Remo's.
What form are Santos and Remo in?
Over the last 5 games Santos have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Remo 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Santos vs Remo?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


