Sarmiento vs Aldosivi: match statistics
Sarmiento is displaying significantly better home form with 60% of matches won at home and an impressive goal difference of +1, conceding only 0.8 goals per match. The hosts also maintain a 60% clean sheet rate in home games, indicating a solid defense. Aldosivi, on the other hand, has not won any away matches this season (0% wins), demonstrating poor offensive efficiency with only 0.4 goals per match and as many as 60% of matches without scoring. The difference in xG (1.67 for Sarmiento vs. 1.18 for Aldosivi) and the visitors' negative goal difference (-6) further confirm the hosts' advantage. Considering all statistics, a Sarmiento victory is the most likely scenario for this match.
Sarmiento vs Aldosivi: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Sarmiento played against Aldosivi in Primera División (Argentina). The game was played on March 22, 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Recent form
Sarmiento has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Aldosivi has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses, with 0.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Sarmiento scores 0.60 goals per game and allows 1.10. Aldosivi scores 0.33 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.01 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 30% of Sarmiento's games and 33% of Aldosivi's. The Over 2.5 rates are 30% and 11%, compared with league averages of 46% for BTTS and 33% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Sarmiento has the higher season xG average, 1.29 to 1.25 per game. Sarmiento takes 10.4 shots per game, while Aldosivi takes 11.1.
First-half and second-half trends
Sarmiento leads at halftime in 30% of its games and scores 0.20 goals per game after halftime. Aldosivi leads at halftime in 11% and scores 0.11 after halftime.
When the teams score
Sarmiento's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (2 goals). For Aldosivi, it is minutes 16-30 (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Primera División games average 2.01 goals. Both teams score in 46% of games, and 33% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Sarmiento is displaying significantly better home form with 60% of matches won at home and an impressive goal difference of +1, conceding only 0.8 goals per match. The hosts also maintain a 60% clean sheet rate in home games, indicating a solid defense. Aldosivi, on the other hand, has not won any away matches this season (0% wins), demonstrating poor offensive efficiency with only 0.4 goals per match and as many as 60% of matches without scoring. The difference in xG (1.67 for Sarmiento vs. 1.18 for Aldosivi) and the visitors' negative goal difference (-6) further confirm the hosts' advantage. Considering all statistics, a Sarmiento victory is the most likely scenario for this match.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Sarmiento | Aldosivi | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 17% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.15 | 0.17 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Sarmiento is 100% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - Sarmiento · 0.4 pts / game - Aldosivi
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sarmiento is 82% better for: goals scored per game.
0.6 goals / game - Sarmiento · 0.33 goals / game - Aldosivi
Aldosivi is 10% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.1 goals / game - Sarmiento · 1 goals / game - Aldosivi
Sarmiento scores in 50% of games (5 of 10 meczów), while Aldosivi keeps a clean sheet in 33% (3 of 9 meczów).
Aldosivi scores in 33% of games (3 of 9 meczów), while Sarmiento keeps a clean sheet in 30% (3 of 10 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Sarmiento
Over / Under - Aldosivi
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Sarmiento is 46% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.3 pts / game - Sarmiento · 0.89 pts / game - Aldosivi
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Sarmiento - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 30%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Aldosivi - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 11% of games and wins 0%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Sarmiento
Aldosivi
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).
Teams vs league
| Sarmiento | Liga | Aldosivi | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.70 | 2.01 | ▼ 1.33 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 30% | 46% | ▼ 33% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 30% | 33% | ▼ 11% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 30% | 35% | ▼ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 60% | 57% | • 56% |
| Goal after half-time | • 70% | 71% | ▼ 56% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Sarmiento's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 1 loss against Aldosivi. Games average 2.67 goals, and both teams scored in 33% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Sarmiento vs Aldosivi?
The Primera División match finished Sarmiento 2:0 Aldosivi. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Sarmiento and Aldosivi?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Sarmiento won 1, Aldosivi won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Sarmiento vs Aldosivi?
Sarmiento score 0.60 goals per game on average and Aldosivi 0.33. The Primera División average is 2.01 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 33% of games. Both teams score in 30% of Sarmiento's matches and 33% of Aldosivi's.
What form are Sarmiento and Aldosivi in?
Over the last 5 games Sarmiento have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Aldosivi 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sarmiento vs Aldosivi?
The statistical background for Sarmiento vs Aldosivi — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.