South Korea - K League 2Data current as of 23 July 2026

Seongnam vs Ansan Greeners: match statistics

Seongnam crest
Seongnam
0 : 1half-time 0:1
Ansan Greeners crest
Ansan Greeners

Seongnam vs Ansan Greeners: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Seongnam play Ansan Greeners in K League 2 (South Korea). The match date is 12 April 2026 at 09:30. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Seongnam: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Ansan Greeners: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Seongnam scores 1.00 and concedes 1.06 goals per match. Ansan Greeners scores 1.00 and concedes 2.00. League average: 2.75 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Seongnam 59%, Ansan Greeners 65%. Over 2.5: Seongnam 35%, Ansan Greeners 65%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Seongnam has higher xG: 1.52 vs 1.18. Seongnam: 11.9 shots per match, Ansan Greeners: 8.9.

Match halves

Seongnam: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.47. Ansan Greeners: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.53.

Goals by minute

Seongnam: 16-30 (4 goals). Ansan Greeners: 31-45+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 2: 2.75 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 2-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

I back Seongnam to win (1): the hosts remain unbeaten at home (0% defeats) and average 1.33 goals scored and 1.00 conceded in home matches, with an average xG of 1.17 and 55% possession. In their last 5 games Seongnam earns 1.8 points per match (form ddwdw: 2 wins and 3 draws), while Ansan has just 0.4 points per match over their last five (form llddl) and has failed to win any. Visitors create a lot on the road (avg. 13 shots and 7 on target with 19% conversion), translating to 2.5 goals per match and xG 1.58, but they have conceded 10 goals in the last 5 matches versus 5 conceded by Seongnam. The hosts’ key advantages are defensive stability, superior form (1.8 vs 0.4 points per match) and game control; I assign a 60% probability to a Seongnam win, 25% to a draw and 15% to an Ansan victory.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

70Possession (%)30
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
24Shots5
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
8Shots on target1
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
3.18xG0.54
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
10Corners0
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
154Dangerous attacks20
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
11Fouls9
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
2Cards1
SeongnamAnsan Greeners

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

SeongnamAnsan Greeners
1Goals scored / match1
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
1.06Goals conceded / match2
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
56%Average possession46%
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
3.53Shots on target / match3.82
SeongnamAnsan Greeners

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.94Shots per match8.94
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
3.53Shots on target3.82
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
8.4%Shot conversion11.2%
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
56%Possession46%
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
1.52xG for1.18
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
1.28xG against2.07
SeongnamAnsan Greeners

Shooting quality

Seongnam: BalancedAnsan Greeners: Balanced
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
Accuracy (shots on target)30%43%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Seongnam is 67% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Seongnam · 0.6 pts / match - Ansan Greeners

Seongnam
DDLLW
Season result split
24% W47% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-8-5
1.18 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-5-2
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
LDDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.70Opponent xG: 1.32BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Ansan Greeners
LLLWL
Season result split
24% W12% R65% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-11
0.82 pts / match · goal difference -17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-3
Last 5 away
1-1-3
DWLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 2.70BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Seongnam is 89% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.06 goals / match - Seongnam · 2 goals / match - Ansan Greeners

Seongnam scoring profile: very strong

Seongnam scores in 65% of matches (11 of 17 matches), while Ansan Greeners keeps a clean sheet in 6% (1 of 17 matches).

Ansan Greeners scoring profile: very strong

Ansan Greeners scores in 71% of matches (12 of 17 matches), while Seongnam keeps a clean sheet in 24% (4 of 17 matches).

17Goals scored (season)17
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
18Goals conceded (season)34
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
2.06Average goals in match3
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
4Goals scored (last 5)4
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
5Goals conceded (last 5)15
SeongnamAnsan Greeners

How often they score at least...

65%1 goal71%
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
29%2 goals18%
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
6%3 goals6%
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
0%4 goals6%
SeongnamAnsan Greeners

How often they concede at least...

76%1 goal94%
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
18%2 goals59%
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
12%3 goals35%
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
0%4 goals6%
SeongnamAnsan Greeners

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time29%
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
6%BTTS in both halves0%
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
18%Scored in both halves0%
SeongnamAnsan Greeners

BTTS and goal count

35%Min. 3 goals and BTTS53%
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS12%
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
40%BTTS - last 560%
SeongnamAnsan Greeners

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

59%Min. 1 goal before half-time82%
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time35%
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
SeongnamAnsan Greeners

2nd half

59%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
41%Min. 2 goals after half-time65%
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
12%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
SeongnamAnsan Greeners

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Seongnam is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.41 pts / match - Seongnam · 0.94 pts / match - Ansan Greeners

Seongnam - half-time state
29% leading53% draw18% trailing
Ansan Greeners - half-time state
18% leading41% draw41% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.41Points per match (1st half)0.94
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
0.53Goals scored (1st half)0.47
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
0.41Goals conceded (1st half)0.82
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
0.94Average goals (1st half)1.29
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
65%Clean sheet before half-time35%
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
59%No goal before half-time53%
SeongnamAnsan Greeners

After half-time (2nd half)

0.88Points per match (2nd half)0.82
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
0.47Goals scored (2nd half)0.53
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
0.65Goals conceded (2nd half)1.18
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
1.12Average goals (2nd half)1.71
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
41%Clean sheet after half-time47%
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
59%No goal after half-time76%
SeongnamAnsan Greeners

Seongnam - second-half results

6% W71% R24% P
24
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.41
PPG before half-time
Lead holding83%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 24%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Ansan Greeners - second-half results

18% W29% R53% P
16
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
-11
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.94
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Seongnam - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.80
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal60%40%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Ansan Greeners - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.60
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match1.02.0
Average goals in match1.42.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%100%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-3-8
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Seongnam
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
4
3
16-30
4
4
31-45
3
6
46-60
3
0
61-75
2
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Ansan Greeners
ScoredConceded
2
4
0-15
2
3
16-30
4
7
31-45
2
6
46-60
3
3
61-75
4
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.53
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
62%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-21%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
46%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Seongnam

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.52
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
71%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
79%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
12% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
12%

Ansan Greeners

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.89
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
74%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
143%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.22
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

SeongnamLigaAnsan Greeners
Average goals in match 2.062.75 3.00
Both teams scored 59%61% 65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 35%56% 65%
Clean sheets 24%24% 6%
Goal before half-time 59%73% 82%
Goal after half-time 59%76% 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.75
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.40
Home goals / match
1.35
Away goals / match
+4%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Seongnam 2 - 0 - 1 Ansan Greeners. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Seongnam FC
4 : 0
Ansan Greeners FC
Ansan Greeners FC
1 : 0
Seongnam FC
Seongnam FC
1 : 0
Ansan Greeners FC

FAQ

What was the result of Seongnam vs Ansan Greeners?

The K League 2 match finished Seongnam 0:1 Ansan Greeners. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Seongnam and Ansan Greeners?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Seongnam won 2, Ansan Greeners won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Seongnam vs Ansan Greeners?

Seongnam score 1.00 goals per game on average and Ansan Greeners 1.00. The K League 2 average is 2.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Seongnam's matches and 65% of Ansan Greeners's.

What form are Seongnam and Ansan Greeners in?

Over the last 5 games Seongnam have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Ansan Greeners 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Seongnam vs Ansan Greeners?

The statistical background for Seongnam vs Ansan Greeners — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.