South Korea - K League 2Seongnam Tancheon Sports ComplexData current as of September 06, 2026

Seongnam vs Busan I'Park: match statistics

Seongnam crest
Seongnam
1 : 0half-time 1:0
Busan I'Park crest
Busan I'Park

Seongnam vs Busan I'Park: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Seongnam played against Busan I'Park in K League 2 (South Korea). The game was played on July 18, 2026. Venue: Seongnam Tancheon Sports Complex. Final score: 1:0.

Recent form

Seongnam has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.40 points per game. Busan I'Park has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Seongnam scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 1.13. Busan I'Park scores 2.19 and allows 1.25. Games in this league average 2.79 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 63% of Seongnam's games and 75% of Busan I'Park's. The Over 2.5 rates are 38% and 69%, compared with league averages of 63% for BTTS and 57% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Seongnam has the higher season xG average, 1.55 to 1.49 per game. Seongnam takes 12.3 shots per game, while Busan I'Park takes 12.7.

First-half and second-half trends

Seongnam leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 0.50 goals per game after halftime. Busan I'Park leads at halftime in 56% and scores 1.19 after halftime.

When the teams score

Seongnam's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (4 goals). For Busan I'Park, it is minutes 76-90+ (12 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

K League 2 games average 2.79 goals. Both teams score in 63% of games, and 57% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 3 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I forecast an away win for Busan I'Park based on their offensive superiority: they have 11 wins this season and 35 goals scored versus Seongnam's 3 wins and 16 goals. In the last 5 matches Busan scored 15 goals and averaged 2.2 points per game, while Seongnam scored 5 goals and averages 1.0 point per game in that period. Away, Busan averages 2.25 goals per match with 0% goalless games, whereas Seongnam at home only averages 0.75 goals per match and has 50% goalless games, which strongly favors the visitors. Seongnam records higher possession at home (59%) and lower average goals conceded at home (0.88 vs. Busan’s 1.75 away), but their home xG of 1.68 versus actual 0.75 and low shot conversion (6% vs. Busan 17%) indicate significant finishing issues. Considering Busan’s higher conversion rate, more shots on target (4.63 vs. 3.75) and consistent scoring ability, I assign 65% probability to an away win, 20% to a draw and 15% to a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

A strong BTTS (Both Teams To Score) signal comes from Busan’s away stats — 88% of away matches with both teams scoring, versus Seongnam’s 63% BTTS at home and a league average of 63%. Busan averages 2.25 goals away and has 15 goals in the last 5 matches (3.0 per game), with away xG of 1.6 (last 5 matches xG 1.72), indicating a genuine scoring capability. Seongnam scores 2.13 goals at home on average and has xG 1.38, while conceding only 0.75 goals at home on the season, but conceding 1.2 goals per game in the last 5, which raises the risk of conceding against an attacking away side. Additionally, Seongnam have 38% clean sheets at home, whereas Busan kept a clean sheet away in only 13% of matches — this lowers the likelihood that either side keeps 0. Considering Busan’s high BTTS rate (88%), Seongnam’s solid 63% home BTTS and Busan’s attacking form (3.0 goals avg in last 5), I price BTTS at 80% (No BTTS 20%) and recommend a 'BTTS - Yes' bet.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

xG and goal statistics indicate a high goal potential: home xG 1.38 versus xG against Busan 1.73 yields an expected ~1.56 goals for Seongnam, and away xG 1.60 versus xG against Seongnam 1.45 yields ~1.53 for Busan (sum ≈3.09). Across the season Seongnam averages 2.13 goals and Busan 2.25 per match (combined 4.38 by seasonal averages), and both teams have 88% of matches with over 1.5 goals, further supporting a high probability of over. A Poisson calculation with λ=3.09 gives roughly an 81% chance of more than 1.5 goals, ~60% for over 2.5 and ~37% for over 3.5, and Busan’s recent form (15 goals in 5 matches, 3.0 avg) increases the likelihood of a higher tally. Additionally BTTS is 63% for Seongnam and 88% for Busan, while clean sheets are 38% vs 13%, suggesting both sides are likely to score. Consequently the strongest and safest signal from the data is Over 1.5, with Over 2.5 as a secondary, moderately valuable option.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Seongnam presents a strong half-time signal: the hosts led at the break in 5 of 8 matches this season (63%) and average 1.13 goals by half-time while conceding only 0.38, translating into an average of 2.25 points gained by half-time. At home this season the hosts also register 2.5 points per match and a 75% win rate, versus 2.0 points and a 63% win rate for Busan, giving the hosts an advantage for the full-time result. Counterarguments are Busan’s form over the last 5 matches (3 wins and 2 draws, 60% wins), the visitors’ higher xG (1.60 vs 1.38) and their pronounced second-half activity (averaging 2.25 goals after the break versus the hosts’ 1.38), so I assign a meaningful weight to turnaround scenarios. Nonetheless, the strongest signal from the data remains Seongnam leading at half-time and winning the match (1/1), while accounting for the risk of a second-half comeback (hence larger weights for X/2 and 2/2).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

51Possession (%)49
SeongnamBusan I'Park
7Shots18
SeongnamBusan I'Park
2Shots on target5
SeongnamBusan I'Park
1.05xG2.09
SeongnamBusan I'Park
3Corners5
SeongnamBusan I'Park
63Dangerous attacks84
SeongnamBusan I'Park
3Fouls13
SeongnamBusan I'Park
1Cards3
SeongnamBusan I'Park

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

SeongnamBusan I'Park
1Goals scored / game2.19
SeongnamBusan I'Park
1.13Goals allowed / game1.25
SeongnamBusan I'Park
56%Average possession47%
SeongnamBusan I'Park
3.63Shots on target / game4.75
SeongnamBusan I'Park

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

12.25Shots per game12.69
SeongnamBusan I'Park
3.63Shots on target4.75
SeongnamBusan I'Park
8.2%Shot conversion17.2%
SeongnamBusan I'Park
56%Possession47%
SeongnamBusan I'Park
1.55xG for1.49
SeongnamBusan I'Park
1.23xG against1.59
SeongnamBusan I'Park

Shooting quality

Seongnam: BalancedBusan I'Park: Counter-attacking
SeongnamBusan I'Park
Accuracy (shots on target)30%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.46

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Busan I'Park is 300% better for: last-5 form.

0.4 pts / game - Seongnam · 1.6 pts / game - Busan I'Park

Seongnam
LDDLL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
19% W50% R31% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-8-5
1.06 pts / game · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-5-2
Last 5 at home
0-3-2
LLDDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.73Opponent xG: 1.19BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Busan I'Park
LWDDW
Season result split
69% W19% R13% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-3-2
2.25 pts / game · goal difference +15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
5-1-2
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WLWLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.74Opponent xG: 1.89BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Busan I'Park is 119% better for: goals scored per game.

1 goals / game - Seongnam · 2.19 goals / game - Busan I'Park

Seongnam is 11% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.13 goals / game - Seongnam · 1.25 goals / game - Busan I'Park

Seongnam scoring profile: strong

Seongnam scores in 63% of games (10 of 16 meczów), while Busan I'Park keeps a clean sheet in 25% (4 of 16 meczów).

Busan I'Park scoring profile: very strong

Busan I'Park scores in 100% of games (16 of 16 meczów), while Seongnam keeps a clean sheet in 19% (3 of 16 meczów).

16Goals scored (season)35
SeongnamBusan I'Park
18Goals conceded (season)20
SeongnamBusan I'Park
2.13Average goals per game3.44
SeongnamBusan I'Park
4Goals scored (last 5)13
SeongnamBusan I'Park
8Goals conceded (last 5)9
SeongnamBusan I'Park

How often they score at least...

63%1 goal100%
SeongnamBusan I'Park
31%2 goals81%
SeongnamBusan I'Park
6%3 goals31%
SeongnamBusan I'Park
0%4 goals6%
SeongnamBusan I'Park

How often they concede at least...

81%1 goal75%
SeongnamBusan I'Park
19%2 goals31%
SeongnamBusan I'Park
13%3 goals19%
SeongnamBusan I'Park
0%4 goals0%
SeongnamBusan I'Park

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

63%
League average

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time25%
SeongnamBusan I'Park
6%BTTS in both halves0%
SeongnamBusan I'Park
19%Scored in both halves31%
SeongnamBusan I'Park

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS69%
SeongnamBusan I'Park
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
SeongnamBusan I'Park
60%BTTS - last 580%
SeongnamBusan I'Park

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

56%Min. 1 goal before half-time94%
SeongnamBusan I'Park
31%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
SeongnamBusan I'Park
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time19%
SeongnamBusan I'Park

2nd half

63%Min. 1 goal after half-time69%
SeongnamBusan I'Park
44%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
SeongnamBusan I'Park
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time38%
SeongnamBusan I'Park

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Busan I'Park is 48% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.31 pts / game - Seongnam · 1.94 pts / game - Busan I'Park

Seongnam - half-time state
25% leading56% draw19% trailing
Busan I'Park - half-time state
56% leading25% draw19% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.31Points per game (1st half)1.94
SeongnamBusan I'Park
0.5Goals scored (1st half)1
SeongnamBusan I'Park
0.44Goals conceded (1st half)0.63
SeongnamBusan I'Park
0.94Average goals (1st half)1.63
SeongnamBusan I'Park
63%Clean sheet before half-time56%
SeongnamBusan I'Park
63%No goal before half-time25%
SeongnamBusan I'Park

After half-time (2nd half)

0.88Points per game (2nd half)1.75
SeongnamBusan I'Park
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)1.19
SeongnamBusan I'Park
0.69Goals conceded (2nd half)0.63
SeongnamBusan I'Park
1.19Average goals (2nd half)1.81
SeongnamBusan I'Park
38%Clean sheet after half-time44%
SeongnamBusan I'Park
56%No goal after half-time44%
SeongnamBusan I'Park

Seongnam - second-half results

6% W69% R25% P
21
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.31
PPG before half-time
Lead holding76%

Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 19%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Busan I'Park - second-half results

44% W44% R13% P
31
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.94
PPG before half-time
Lead holding123%

Leads at halftime in 56% of games and wins 69%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Seongnam - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.600.80
Goals scored / game0.20.6
Goals allowed / game0.80.8
Average goals per game1.01.4
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-3-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Busan I'Park - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.602.00
Goals scored / game1.21.4
Goals allowed / game1.20.6
Average goals per game2.42.0
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference0+4
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Seongnam
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
4
3
16-30
3
4
31-45
3
6
46-60
3
0
61-75
2
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Busan I'Park
ScoredConceded
5
1
0-15
2
4
16-30
9
5
31-45
1
3
46-60
6
2
61-75
12
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.79
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.1 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
69%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-55%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
63%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Seongnam

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.45
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.55
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
71%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
81%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.66
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

Busan I'Park

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.70
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.34
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
158%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
89%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.65
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
34% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
34%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

SeongnamLigaBusan I'Park
Average goals per game 2.132.79 3.44
Both teams scored 63%63% 75%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 38%57% 69%
Clean sheets 19%22% 25%
Goal before half-time 56%73% 94%
Goal after half-time 63%76% 69%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.79
Average goals per game
63%
Both teams scored
57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.40
Home goals / game
1.39
Away goals / game
+1%
Home attack advantage
+1%
Home defensive advantage
+-1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
51%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Busan I'ParkYellow cardDong-Soo Lee
  2. SeongnamGoalTae-Yang YangAssist: Jun-Sang Lee
  3. SeongnamSubstitutionOn: Min-Ho YunOff: Min-Jae Kim
  4. Busan I'ParkYellow cardHee-Seung Kim
  5. Busan I'ParkSubstitutionOn: Ga-On BaekOff: Hye-seong Park
  6. SeongnamSubstitutionOn: Byeong-gyu ParkOff: Jun-Sang Lee
  7. Busan I'ParkSubstitutionOn: Dong-Wook KimOff: Hyun-Beom Ahn
  8. SeongnamYellow cardSun Yu

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Seongnam's perspective: 1 win, 3 draws and 0 losses against Busan I'Park. Games average 1.25 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

Busan I'Park
1 : 1
Seongnam
Seongnam FC
2 : 1
Busan I'Park
Busan I'Park
0 : 0
Seongnam FC
Seongnam FC
0 : 0
Busan I'Park

FAQ

What was the result of Seongnam vs Busan I'Park?

The K League 2 match finished Seongnam 1:0 Busan I'Park. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Seongnam and Busan I'Park?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Seongnam won 1, Busan I'Park won 0 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 1.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Seongnam vs Busan I'Park?

Seongnam score 1.00 goals per game on average and Busan I'Park 2.19. The K League 2 average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Seongnam's matches and 75% of Busan I'Park's.

What form are Seongnam and Busan I'Park in?

Over the last 5 games Seongnam have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Busan I'Park 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Seongnam vs Busan I'Park?

The statistical background for Seongnam vs Busan I'Park — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.