Seongnam vs Gimhae City: match statistics
Seongnam vs Gimhae City: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Seongnam played against Gimhae City in K League 2 (South Korea). The game was played on June 5, 2026. Venue: Seongnam Tancheon Sports Complex. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Seongnam has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Gimhae City has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses, with 0.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Seongnam scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 1.00. Gimhae City scores 0.77 and allows 2.23. Games in this league average 2.71 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 62% of Seongnam's games and 69% of Gimhae City's. The Over 2.5 rates are 38% and 62%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 55% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Seongnam has the higher season xG average, 1.49 to 1.26 per game. Seongnam takes 11.2 shots per game, while Gimhae City takes 9.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Seongnam leads at halftime in 31% of its games and scores 0.46 goals per game after halftime. Gimhae City leads at halftime in 8% and scores 0.62 after halftime.
When the teams score
Seongnam's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (3 goals). For Gimhae City, it is minutes 76-90+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
K League 2 games average 2.71 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 55% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Seongnam holds a clear statistical advantage: at home they have a record of 3 wins, 7 draws and 3 losses, while Gimhae away have only 1 win, 2 draws and 10 losses. The hosts have scored 13 goals this season and average 0.71 goals scored per home game with 0.86 conceded, whereas the visitors have 10 goals this season and on the road average 0.86 scored and 1.86 conceded per match. Seongnam generates better offensive opportunities – average home xG is 1.52 with 10.71 shots per game (3.29 on target), versus visitors’ away xG of 1.19 and 8.86 shots. In the last 5 matches both teams have scored 4 goals each, but Seongnam has 1.2 points per game with a 1-3-1 record, while Gimhae have 0.6 points per game with a 1-0-4 record and 9 goals conceded in those five fixtures. Considering the higher xG (1.52 vs 1.19), superior home defense (0.86 vs 1.86 conceded) and the visitors’ poor form, I project a Seongnam victory, although the high rate of goalless home matches for the hosts (no goal in 57% of home games) increases the risk of a low-scoring game or draw.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams show high season BTTS rates: Seongnam 67% and Gimhae City 71%, averaging 69%, above the league benchmark of 62%. The hosts have zero clean sheets (0% clean) and concede 2.67 goals per game on average, while the visitors concede 1.86 goals per game, increasing the likelihood of goals from both sides. In the last 5 matches both teams registered BTTS in 60% of games; across those five Seongnam scored 4 and conceded 5, and Gimhae City scored 4 and conceded 9, highlighting defensive vulnerabilities for both hosts and visitors. Despite low season goals scored averages (0.67 and 0.86), offensive xG stands at 1.3 for the hosts and 1.19 for the visitors with shot conversion rates of 6% and 10%, indicating chances are being created. I assign 74% to BTTS - Yes and 26% to No Goal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Both teams frequently score: Seongnam averages 0.67 goals and BTTS 67%, while Gimhae averages 0.86 goals and BTTS 71%, with matches over 1.5 goals at 83% (Seongnam) and 86% (Gimhae). Defenses are vulnerable — Seongnam concedes 2.67 goals/match, Gimhae 1.86, and xG against of 1.78 (Seongnam) and 1.75 (Gimhae), increasing the likelihood of goals from both sides. Attacking xG is 1.30 (Seongnam) and 1.19 (Gimhae), with average shots 10.5 vs 8.86; averaging attack xG and opponent xG yields ~1.525 for Seongnam ((1.30+1.75)/2) and ~1.485 for Gimhae ((1.19+1.78)/2). After adjusting for Seongnam’s low finishing (6% conversion) and recent form over the last 5 matches (last5 xG 1.46 vs 1.32), I project expected goals of ~1.45 for Seongnam and ~1.35 for Gimhae (total 2.80). Consequently the strongest signal is Over 2.5 (I recommend Over), with estimated probabilities over2.5 ≈68% (over1.5 ≈92%, over3.5 ≈31%), so the 2.5 line offers the best risk-reward balance.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Seongnam have not won at home (winPercentage_home 0.0%) and concede an average of 2.67 goals per match, while Gimhae City have a 14.0% win rate and a season scoring average of 0.86. Seongnam were trailing at half-time in 4 of 6 matches (trailingAtHT_home = 4, trailingAtHTPercentage_home = 67%) and average just 0.33 goals scored by HT versus 0.83 conceded, increasing the likelihood that the visitors will lead after 45 minutes. xG is 1.30 for Seongnam versus 1.19 for Gimhae, but conversion rate is 6% for the home side versus 10% for the visitors, so Gimhae convert chances more efficiently. The second half produces goals — over 0.5 second-half goals occur for the home team in 83% and for the visitors in 100% of matches, therefore I forecast the visitors to maintain the lead and Gimhae to win (HT/FT 2/2).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Seongnam | Gimhae City | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.21 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Seongnam is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - Seongnam · 0.6 pts / game - Gimhae City
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Seongnam is 30% better for: goals scored per game.
1 goals / game - Seongnam · 0.77 goals / game - Gimhae City
Seongnam is 123% better for: goals allowed per game.
1 goals / game - Seongnam · 2.23 goals / game - Gimhae City
Seongnam scores in 62% of games (8 of 13 meczów), while Gimhae City keeps a clean sheet in 8% (1 of 13 meczów).
Gimhae City scores in 77% of games (10 of 13 meczów), while Seongnam keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Seongnam
Over / Under - Gimhae City
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Seongnam is 217% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.46 pts / game - Seongnam · 0.46 pts / game - Gimhae City
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Seongnam - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 31% of games and wins 23%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Gimhae City - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 8% of games and wins 8%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Seongnam
Gimhae City
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).
Teams vs league
| Seongnam | Liga | Gimhae City | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.00 | 2.71 | ▲ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | • 62% | 62% | ▲ 69% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 38% | 55% | ▲ 62% |
| Clean sheets | • 23% | 24% | ▼ 8% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 54% | 73% | ▲ 85% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 62% | 75% | ▲ 92% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Seongnam vs Gimhae City?
The K League 2 match finished Seongnam 1:1 Gimhae City. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Seongnam vs Gimhae City?
Seongnam score 1.00 goals per game on average and Gimhae City 0.77. The K League 2 average is 2.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 62% of Seongnam's matches and 69% of Gimhae City's.
What form are Seongnam and Gimhae City in?
Over the last 5 games Seongnam have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Gimhae City 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Seongnam vs Gimhae City?
The statistical background for Seongnam vs Gimhae City — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.