South Korea - K League 2Data current as of September 12, 2026

Seongnam vs Gimpo Citizen: match statistics

Seongnam crest
Seongnam
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Gimpo Citizen crest
Gimpo Citizen
130%(2.55)
X25%(2.96)
245%(3.05)

Gimpo Citizen displays better away form with a 67% win rate on the road and a solid goal difference (4:2). The visiting team boasts a higher average xG (1.71 vs 1.32) and better efficiency in away matches, averaging 6 shots on target per game. Seongnam, despite a decent home form (50% wins), has yet to keep a clean sheet at home and concedes an average of 1.5 goals per match. Gimpo Citizen also has a better average possession (54% vs 53%) and a lower goals conceded rate away from home (0.67). Considering the goal difference (+2 for the visitors vs +1 for the hosts) and the recent form of both teams, Gimpo Citizen holds the advantage in this encounter.

Seongnam vs Gimpo Citizen: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Seongnam played against Gimpo Citizen in K League 2 (South Korea). The game was played on March 28, 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Recent form

Seongnam has 1 win, 2 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.67 points per game. Gimpo Citizen has 2 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Seongnam scores 1.67 goals per game and allows 1.33. Gimpo Citizen scores 1.33 and allows 0.67. Games in this league average 2.94 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 100% of Seongnam's games and 33% of Gimpo Citizen's. The Over 2.5 rates are 67% and 33%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 59% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Gimpo Citizen has the higher season xG average, 1.71 to 1.13 per game. Seongnam takes 7.7 shots per game, while Gimpo Citizen takes 13.3.

First-half and second-half trends

Seongnam leads at halftime in 67% of its games and scores 0.33 goals per game after halftime. Gimpo Citizen leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.67 after halftime.

When the teams score

Seongnam's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (2 goals). For Gimpo Citizen, it is minutes 16-30 (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

K League 2 games average 2.94 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 59% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 3 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 0.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Gimpo Citizen displays better away form with a 67% win rate on the road and a solid goal difference (4:2). The visiting team boasts a higher average xG (1.71 vs 1.32) and better efficiency in away matches, averaging 6 shots on target per game. Seongnam, despite a decent home form (50% wins), has yet to keep a clean sheet at home and concedes an average of 1.5 goals per match. Gimpo Citizen also has a better average possession (54% vs 53%) and a lower goals conceded rate away from home (0.67). Considering the goal difference (+2 for the visitors vs +1 for the hosts) and the recent form of both teams, Gimpo Citizen holds the advantage in this encounter.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Data from the last 5 matches indicates a realistic chance for Both Teams To Score: Seongnam has a BTTS rate of 60% with an average of 1.2 goals scored and 0.8 conceded, while Gimpo has 40% with 1.0 scored and 0.8 conceded. xG metrics also support the Goal/Goal scenario (last5 xG for: 1.01 for Seongnam and 1.69 for Gimpo, with xG against around 1.1 for both sides), suggesting regular goal-scoring opportunities. The league has a high BTTS percentage (66%) and a high average goals (3.06), which increases the baseline probability of both teams scoring. At the same time, Gimpo on a seasonal basis concedes very little (GA 2; conceded AVG 0.67) and has a 33% clean sheet rate, which significantly limits confidence in BTTS - Yes. The balance of factors gives a slight advantage to the 'BTTS: yes' bet, but it is not an extremely strong signal due to the visitors' relatively solid defense.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The season data for the hosts contains numerous zeros, so I place greater emphasis on the form from the last 5 matches and xG metrics. In the last 5 matches, Seongnam averages 1.2 goals scored and 0.8 conceded per game, while Gimpo averages 1.0 scored and 0.8 conceded, indicating rather controlled results. In terms of chance quality, Gimpo generates high xG (last5 xG for 1.69) and many shots and shots on target (13.33 and 6.0), but simultaneously concedes very little (seasonally 0.67 goals/match; last5 0.8). The combined xG (approx. 1.05 for Seongnam and 1.40 for Gimpo) gives a total of 2.45 expected goals, a level closer to 2–3 goals than high-scoring scenarios. Although the league is generally 'overish' (Over 2.5 at 63%), the last 5 matches of both teams show a lower over rate (Over 2.5: Seongnam 40%, Gimpo 20%). Therefore, the strongest signal is Under 3.5, as for such a bet to lose, a clear 'explosion' of goals is needed, which is not supported by either the average goals conceded or these teams' over distribution.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest HT signal is a draw: in the last 5 matches, both teams were level at the break in 60% of their meetings, and neither was trailing at HT (0% 'trailingAtHT'). Over the last 5 matchweeks, games have been rather tight (Seongnam: 1.2 scored and 0.8 conceded; Gimpo: 1.0 scored and 0.8 conceded per game), which supports a scenario without a clear lead at halftime. Seongnam is in more stable form (WDDDW, 0% losses in L5) and has a better PPG in L5 (1.8 vs 1.4), limiting the risk of a home defeat. Simultaneously, Gimpo has solid defensive parameters in the season's data (0.67 goals conceded/match, xGA 0.95) and often plays cautiously in the first half (67% draws at the break), which favors maintaining the scoreline. Overall, the most probable outcome is a draw at halftime and a draw at full-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

60Possession (%)40
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
4Shots9
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
2Shots on target3
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
0.87xG1.28
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
3Corners4
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
63Dangerous attacks68
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
8Fouls12
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
2Cards6
SeongnamGimpo Citizen

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

SeongnamGimpo Citizen
1.67Goals scored / game1.33
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
1.33Goals allowed / game0.67
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
51%Average possession54%
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
2.33Shots on target / game6
SeongnamGimpo Citizen

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

7.67Shots per game13.33
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
2.33Shots on target6
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
21.7%Shot conversion10%
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
51%Possession54%
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
1.13xG for1.71
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
1.05xG against0.95
SeongnamGimpo Citizen

Shooting quality

Seongnam: Efficient finishingGimpo Citizen: Balanced
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
Accuracy (shots on target)30%45%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.720.22

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Gimpo Citizen is 20% better for: last-5 form.

1.67 pts / game - Seongnam · 2 pts / game - Gimpo Citizen

Seongnam
DDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
33% W67% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-0
1.67 pts / game · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-0
1.67 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-1-0
Last 5 at home
1-1-0
DW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.7Goals conceded: 1.3xG: 1.13Opponent xG: 1.05BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 67%
Gimpo Citizen
WWL
Season result split
67% W0% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-1
2.00 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-1
2.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-1
Last 5 away
2-0-1
WWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.3Goals conceded: 0.7xG: 1.71Opponent xG: 0.95BTTS: 33%Over 2.5: 33%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Seongnam is 26% better for: goals scored per game.

1.67 goals / game - Seongnam · 1.33 goals / game - Gimpo Citizen

Gimpo Citizen is 99% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.33 goals / game - Seongnam · 0.67 goals / game - Gimpo Citizen

Seongnam scoring profile: very strong

Seongnam scores in 100% of games (3 of 3 meczów), while Gimpo Citizen keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 meczów).

Gimpo Citizen scoring profile: very strong

Gimpo Citizen scores in 67% of games (2 of 3 meczów), while Seongnam keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 meczów).

5Goals scored (season)4
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
4Goals conceded (season)2
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
3Average goals per game2
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
5Goals scored (last 5)4
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
4Goals conceded (last 5)2
SeongnamGimpo Citizen

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal67%
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
67%2 goals33%
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
0%3 goals33%
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
0%4 goals0%
SeongnamGimpo Citizen

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal67%
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
33%2 goals0%
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
0%3 goals0%
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
0%4 goals0%
SeongnamGimpo Citizen

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

62%
League average

Goal patterns

67%BTTS at half-time33%
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
0%BTTS in both halves0%
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
33%Scored in both halves33%
SeongnamGimpo Citizen

BTTS and goal count

67%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
100%BTTS - last 533%
SeongnamGimpo Citizen

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time33%
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
67%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
33%Min. 3 goals before half-time33%
SeongnamGimpo Citizen

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
SeongnamGimpo Citizen

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Seongnam is 40% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.33 pts / game - Seongnam · 1.67 pts / game - Gimpo Citizen

Seongnam - half-time state
67% leading33% draw0% trailing
Gimpo Citizen - half-time state
33% leading67% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.33Points per game (1st half)1.67
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
1.33Goals scored (1st half)0.67
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
0.67Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
2Average goals (1st half)1
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
33%Clean sheet before half-time67%
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
0%No goal before half-time67%
SeongnamGimpo Citizen

After half-time (2nd half)

0.67Points per game (2nd half)2
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
0.33Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)0.33
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
1Average goals (2nd half)1
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
33%Clean sheet after half-time67%
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
67%No goal after half-time33%
SeongnamGimpo Citizen

Seongnam - second-half results

0% W67% D33% L
7
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
2
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding49%

Leads at halftime in 67% of games and wins 33%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Gimpo Citizen - second-half results

67% W0% D33% L
5
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding203%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Seongnam - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.330.67
Goals scored / game1.30.3
Goals allowed / game0.70.7
Average goals per game2.01.0
1 goal100%67%
2 goals67%33%
3 goals33%0%
Clean sheet33%33%
No goal0%67%
Goal difference+2-1
Half-time: 67% leading - 33% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 67% draw - 33% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 67% - Half-time goals total: 4
Gimpo Citizen - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.672.00
Goals scored / game0.70.7
Goals allowed / game0.30.3
Average goals per game1.01.0
1 goal33%100%
2 goals33%0%
3 goals33%0%
Clean sheet67%67%
No goal67%33%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 33% leading - 67% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 67% won - 0% draw - 33% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 33% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Seongnam
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
2
0
16-30
2
2
31-45
0
2
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Gimpo Citizen
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
1
1
31-45
0
0
46-60
1
1
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.50
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.2 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
85%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
67%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
67%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Seongnam

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.54
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
118%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
87%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-1.0
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Gimpo Citizen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.76
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.38
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
48%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

SeongnamLigaGimpo Citizen
Average goals per game 3.002.94 2.00
Both teams scored 100%62% 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 67%59% 33%
Clean sheets 0%22% 33%
Goal before half-time 100%85% 33%
Goal after half-time 67%74% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.94
Average goals per game
62%
Both teams scored
59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.41
Home goals / game
1.53
Away goals / game
+-8%
Home attack advantage
+-9%
Home defensive advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
29%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Gimpo CitizenYellow cardChang-Seok Lim
  2. SeongnamSubstitutionOn: Jeong-Bin LeeOff: Min-Ho Yun
  3. Gimpo CitizenYellow cardDong-Min Kim
  4. Gimpo CitizenYellow cardDjalma Celestino Evaristo
  5. SeongnamSubstitutionOn: Jun-Sun RyuOff: Su-bin Park
  6. Gimpo CitizenYellow cardTae-Han Kim
  7. SeongnamYellow cardSang-Min Lee
  8. Gimpo CitizenRed cardSung-Bum Choi
  9. SeongnamYellow cardJun-Sang Lee

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Seongnam's perspective: 0 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses against Gimpo Citizen. Games average 0.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

Gimpo Citizen FC
0 : 0
Seongnam FC
Seongnam FC
0 : 0
Gimpo Citizen FC
Gimpo Citizen FC
0 : 0
Seongnam FC

FAQ

What was the result of Seongnam vs Gimpo Citizen?

The K League 2 match finished Seongnam 0:0 Gimpo Citizen. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Seongnam and Gimpo Citizen?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Seongnam won 0, Gimpo Citizen won 0 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 0.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Seongnam vs Gimpo Citizen?

Seongnam score 1.67 goals per game on average and Gimpo Citizen 1.33. The K League 2 average is 2.94 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Seongnam's matches and 33% of Gimpo Citizen's.

What form are Seongnam and Gimpo Citizen in?

Over the last 5 games Seongnam have a 1-2-0 record (1.67 points per game) and Gimpo Citizen 2-0-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Seongnam vs Gimpo Citizen?

The statistical background for Seongnam vs Gimpo Citizen — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.