South Korea - K League 2Data current as of 23 July 2026

Seongnam vs Gimpo Citizen: match statistics

Seongnam crest
Seongnam
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Gimpo Citizen crest
Gimpo Citizen
130%(2.55)
X25%(2.96)
245%(3.05)

Gimpo Citizen displays better away form with a 67% win rate on the road and a solid goal difference (4:2). The visiting team boasts a higher average xG (1.71 vs 1.32) and better efficiency in away matches, averaging 6 shots on target per game. Seongnam, despite a decent home form (50% wins), has yet to keep a clean sheet at home and concedes an average of 1.5 goals per match. Gimpo Citizen also has a better average possession (54% vs 53%) and a lower goals conceded rate away from home (0.67). Considering the goal difference (+2 for the visitors vs +1 for the hosts) and the recent form of both teams, Gimpo Citizen holds the advantage in this encounter.

Seongnam vs Gimpo Citizen: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Seongnam play Gimpo Citizen in K League 2 (South Korea). The match date is 28 March 2026 at 08:30. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Seongnam: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Gimpo Citizen: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Seongnam scores 1.00 and concedes 1.06 goals per match. Gimpo Citizen scores 1.18 and concedes 1.12. League average: 2.75 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Seongnam 59%, Gimpo Citizen 53%. Over 2.5: Seongnam 35%, Gimpo Citizen 35%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

xG is very similar for both teams. Seongnam: 11.9 shots per match, Gimpo Citizen: 12.3.

Match halves

Seongnam: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.47. Gimpo Citizen: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.65.

Goals by minute

Seongnam: 16-30 (4 goals). Gimpo Citizen: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 2: 2.75 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 0-3-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Gimpo Citizen displays better away form with a 67% win rate on the road and a solid goal difference (4:2). The visiting team boasts a higher average xG (1.71 vs 1.32) and better efficiency in away matches, averaging 6 shots on target per game. Seongnam, despite a decent home form (50% wins), has yet to keep a clean sheet at home and concedes an average of 1.5 goals per match. Gimpo Citizen also has a better average possession (54% vs 53%) and a lower goals conceded rate away from home (0.67). Considering the goal difference (+2 for the visitors vs +1 for the hosts) and the recent form of both teams, Gimpo Citizen holds the advantage in this encounter.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

60Possession (%)40
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
4Shots9
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
2Shots on target3
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
0.87xG1.28
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
3Corners4
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
63Dangerous attacks68
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
8Fouls12
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
2Cards6
SeongnamGimpo Citizen

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

SeongnamGimpo Citizen
1Goals scored / match1.18
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
1.06Goals conceded / match1.12
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
56%Average possession50%
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
3.53Shots on target / match4
SeongnamGimpo Citizen

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.94Shots per match12.29
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
3.53Shots on target4
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
8.4%Shot conversion9.6%
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
56%Possession50%
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
1.52xG for1.52
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
1.28xG against1.27
SeongnamGimpo Citizen

Shooting quality

Seongnam: BalancedGimpo Citizen: Balanced
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
Accuracy (shots on target)30%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Seongnam
DDLLW
Season result split
24% W47% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-8-5
1.18 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-5-2
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
LDDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.70Opponent xG: 1.32BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Gimpo Citizen
WDLLD
Season result split
35% W41% R24% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-7-4
1.47 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-5-3
Last 5 away
3-1-1
DWWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.78Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Gimpo Citizen is 18% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - Seongnam · 1.18 goals / match - Gimpo Citizen

Seongnam is 6% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.06 goals / match - Seongnam · 1.12 goals / match - Gimpo Citizen

Seongnam scoring profile: strong

Seongnam scores in 65% of matches (11 of 17 matches), while Gimpo Citizen keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 matches).

Gimpo Citizen scoring profile: very strong

Gimpo Citizen scores in 76% of matches (13 of 17 matches), while Seongnam keeps a clean sheet in 24% (4 of 17 matches).

17Goals scored (season)20
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
18Goals conceded (season)19
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
2.06Average goals in match2.29
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
4Goals scored (last 5)5
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
5Goals conceded (last 5)8
SeongnamGimpo Citizen

How often they score at least...

65%1 goal76%
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
29%2 goals29%
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
6%3 goals12%
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
0%4 goals0%
SeongnamGimpo Citizen

How often they concede at least...

76%1 goal71%
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
18%2 goals35%
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
12%3 goals6%
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
0%4 goals0%
SeongnamGimpo Citizen

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time29%
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
6%BTTS in both halves6%
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
18%Scored in both halves24%
SeongnamGimpo Citizen

BTTS and goal count

35%Min. 3 goals and BTTS35%
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
40%BTTS - last 560%
SeongnamGimpo Citizen

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

59%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
SeongnamGimpo Citizen

2nd half

59%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
41%Min. 2 goals after half-time18%
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
12%Min. 3 goals after half-time12%
SeongnamGimpo Citizen

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Seongnam is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.41 pts / match - Seongnam · 1.24 pts / match - Gimpo Citizen

Seongnam - half-time state
29% leading53% draw18% trailing
Gimpo Citizen - half-time state
24% leading53% draw24% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.41Points per match (1st half)1.24
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
0.53Goals scored (1st half)0.53
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
0.41Goals conceded (1st half)0.53
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
0.94Average goals (1st half)1.06
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
65%Clean sheet before half-time47%
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
59%No goal before half-time59%
SeongnamGimpo Citizen

After half-time (2nd half)

0.88Points per match (2nd half)1.59
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
0.47Goals scored (2nd half)0.65
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
0.65Goals conceded (2nd half)0.59
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
1.12Average goals (2nd half)1.24
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
41%Clean sheet after half-time59%
SeongnamGimpo Citizen
59%No goal after half-time41%
SeongnamGimpo Citizen

Seongnam - second-half results

6% W71% R24% P
24
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.41
PPG before half-time
Lead holding83%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 24%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Gimpo Citizen - second-half results

47% W18% R35% P
21
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.24
PPG before half-time
Lead holding146%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Seongnam - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.80
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal60%40%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Gimpo Citizen - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.20
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.41.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Seongnam
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
4
3
16-30
4
4
31-45
3
6
46-60
3
0
61-75
2
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Gimpo Citizen
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
2
3
16-30
4
2
31-45
0
2
46-60
3
2
61-75
8
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.18
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
79%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
56%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
49%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Seongnam

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.52
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
71%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
79%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
12% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
12%

Gimpo Citizen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.47
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
40% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
40%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

SeongnamLigaGimpo Citizen
Average goals in match 2.062.75 2.29
Both teams scored 59%61% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 35%56% 35%
Clean sheets 24%24% 29%
Goal before half-time 59%73% 65%
Goal after half-time 59%76% 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.75
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.40
Home goals / match
1.35
Away goals / match
+4%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Seongnam 0 - 3 - 0 Gimpo Citizen. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Gimpo Citizen FC
0 : 0
Seongnam FC
Seongnam FC
0 : 0
Gimpo Citizen FC
Gimpo Citizen FC
0 : 0
Seongnam FC

FAQ

What was the result of Seongnam vs Gimpo Citizen?

The K League 2 match finished Seongnam 0:0 Gimpo Citizen. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Seongnam and Gimpo Citizen?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Seongnam won 0, Gimpo Citizen won 0 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 0.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Seongnam vs Gimpo Citizen?

Seongnam score 1.00 goals per game on average and Gimpo Citizen 1.18. The K League 2 average is 2.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Seongnam's matches and 53% of Gimpo Citizen's.

What form are Seongnam and Gimpo Citizen in?

Over the last 5 games Seongnam have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Gimpo Citizen 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Seongnam vs Gimpo Citizen?

The statistical background for Seongnam vs Gimpo Citizen — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.