Seongnam vs Paju Citizen: match statistics
Seongnam vs Paju Citizen: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Seongnam play Paju Citizen in K League 2 (South Korea). The match date is 19 April 2026 at 07:00. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Seongnam: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Paju Citizen: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Seongnam scores 1.00 and concedes 1.06 goals per match. Paju Citizen scores 1.00 and concedes 1.29. League average: 2.75 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Seongnam 59%, Paju Citizen 47%. Over 2.5: Seongnam 35%, Paju Citizen 47%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.
xG, shots and style
Seongnam has higher xG: 1.52 vs 1.24. Seongnam: 11.9 shots per match, Paju Citizen: 9.8.
Match halves
Seongnam: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.47. Paju Citizen: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.41.
Goals by minute
Seongnam: 16-30 (4 goals). Paju Citizen: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
K League 2: 2.75 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Match description
Seongnam holds the advantage in control and chance creation: average possession 59% vs 43% for Paju and home xG 1.67 versus away xG 1.38, with more total shots (11.75 vs 10.33), although Paju records more shots on target (4.33 vs 3.75). Defensively the hosts perform better — they concede 1.00 goal per home match with xG against 0.96, while Paju concedes 2.00 goals on the road and has xG against 1.46. At the same time Paju is significantly more clinical in finishing: shot conversion 16% vs 9% for Seongnam and 0% of away matches without a goal (Seongnam has 50% of home matches without scoring), which increases the visitors’ chance to score. In the last five matches Paju scored 9 goals and Seongnam 7, and Paju also has higher points per match in the last 5 (1.8 vs 1.6), indicating better attacking form. Considering Seongnam’s superior defense and higher xG and Paju’s high finishing efficiency, I predict a narrow home victory, hence the probability distribution 50% home, 25% draw and 25% away.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Seongnam | Paju Citizen | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Seongnam is 25% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Seongnam · 0.8 pts / match - Paju Citizen
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Seongnam is 22% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.06 goals / match - Seongnam · 1.29 goals / match - Paju Citizen
Seongnam scores in 65% of matches (11 of 17 matches), while Paju Citizen keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 matches).
Paju Citizen scores in 59% of matches (10 of 17 matches), while Seongnam keeps a clean sheet in 24% (4 of 17 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Seongnam
Over / Under — Paju Citizen
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Seongnam - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 24%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Paju Citizen - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Seongnam
Paju Citizen
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).
Teams vs league
| Seongnam | Liga | Paju Citizen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.06 | 2.75 | ▼ 2.29 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 59% | 61% | ▼ 47% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 35% | 56% | ▼ 47% |
| Clean sheets | • 24% | 24% | ▲ 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 59% | 73% | ▼ 53% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 59% | 76% | ▼ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of Seongnam vs Paju Citizen?
The K League 2 match finished Seongnam 0:1 Paju Citizen. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Seongnam vs Paju Citizen?
Seongnam score 1.00 goals per game on average and Paju Citizen 1.00. The K League 2 average is 2.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Seongnam's matches and 47% of Paju Citizen's.
What form are Seongnam and Paju Citizen in?
Over the last 5 games Seongnam have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Paju Citizen 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Seongnam vs Paju Citizen?
The statistical background for Seongnam vs Paju Citizen — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.