Sepsi vs Concordia Chiajna: match statistics
Sepsi vs Concordia Chiajna: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Sepsi played against Concordia Chiajna in Liga II (Romania). The game was played on December 12, 2025. Final score: 3:1.
Recent form
Sepsi has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.60 points per game. Concordia Chiajna has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Sepsi scores 1.44 goals per game and allows 0.75. Concordia Chiajna scores 1.50 and allows 0.94. Games in this league average 2.66 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 44% of Sepsi's games and 44% of Concordia Chiajna's. The Over 2.5 rates are 31% and 38%, compared with league averages of 48% for BTTS and 49% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Concordia Chiajna has the higher season xG average, 1.67 to 1.64 per game. Sepsi takes 12.2 shots per game, while Concordia Chiajna takes 12.9.
First-half and second-half trends
Sepsi leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 0.69 goals per game after halftime. Concordia Chiajna leads at halftime in 25% and scores 0.94 after halftime.
When the teams score
Sepsi's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (6 goals). For Concordia Chiajna, it is minutes 61-75 (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Liga II games average 2.66 goals. Both teams score in 48% of games, and 49% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Sepsi | Concordia Chiajna | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Sepsi is 86% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / game - Sepsi · 1.4 pts / game - Concordia Chiajna
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sepsi is 25% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.75 goals / game - Sepsi · 0.94 goals / game - Concordia Chiajna
Sepsi scores in 88% of games (14 of 16 meczów), while Concordia Chiajna keeps a clean sheet in 38% (6 of 16 meczów).
Concordia Chiajna scores in 75% of games (12 of 16 meczów), while Sepsi keeps a clean sheet in 50% (8 of 16 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Sepsi
Over / Under - Concordia Chiajna
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Sepsi is 58% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.88 pts / game - Sepsi · 1.19 pts / game - Concordia Chiajna
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Sepsi - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 63%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Concordia Chiajna - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 44%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +7 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 100% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Sepsi
Concordia Chiajna
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga II).
Teams vs league
| Sepsi | Liga | Concordia Chiajna | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.19 | 2.66 | ▼ 2.44 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 44% | 48% | ▼ 44% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 31% | 49% | ▼ 38% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 31% | ▲ 38% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 69% | 73% | ▲ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 88% | 81% | ▼ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Sepsi vs Concordia Chiajna?
The Liga II match finished Sepsi 3:1 Concordia Chiajna. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Sepsi vs Concordia Chiajna?
Sepsi score 1.44 goals per game on average and Concordia Chiajna 1.50. The Liga II average is 2.66 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Sepsi's matches and 44% of Concordia Chiajna's.
What form are Sepsi and Concordia Chiajna in?
Over the last 5 games Sepsi have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Concordia Chiajna 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sepsi vs Concordia Chiajna?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Sepsi vs Concordia Chiajna: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.