Switzerland - Super LeagueData current as of September 05, 2026

Servette vs Grasshopper: match statistics

Servette crest
Servette
5 : 0half-time 4:0
Grasshopper crest
Grasshopper
155%(1.85)
X30%(3.50)
215%(3.80)

Servette holds a clear advantage over Grasshopper in this match. The hosts boast a significantly better home record with 20% wins and only 33% losses, while the visitors win merely 13% of their away fixtures with a hefty 60% defeat rate. Grasshopper is in dreadful form from their last five matches (only 0.6 points per game) and has a catastrophic away goal difference (-16). Servette scores an average of 1.47 goals per game at home, whereas Grasshopper concedes an average of 2.13 goals in away matches, further favoring the hosts. Although Servette's form is also not impressive (1.2 points per game), their home advantage and the visitors' weakness should tip the scales of victory in their favor.

Servette vs Grasshopper: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Servette played against Grasshopper in Super League (Switzerland). The game was played on March 21, 2026. Final score: 5:0.

Recent form

Servette has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Grasshopper has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses, with 0.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Servette scores 1.60 goals per game and allows 1.87. Grasshopper scores 1.27 and allows 1.87. Games in this league average 3.28 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 77% of Servette's games and 63% of Grasshopper's. The Over 2.5 rates are 63% and 53%, compared with league averages of 69% for BTTS and 67% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Servette has the higher season xG average, 1.52 to 1.48 per game. Servette takes 13.2 shots per game, while Grasshopper takes 13.3.

First-half and second-half trends

Servette leads at halftime in 20% of its games and scores 1.03 goals per game after halftime. Grasshopper leads at halftime in 23% and scores 0.67 after halftime.

When the teams score

Servette's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (17 goals). For Grasshopper, it is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Super League games average 3.28 goals. Both teams score in 69% of games, and 67% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Servette holds a clear advantage over Grasshopper in this match. The hosts boast a significantly better home record with 20% wins and only 33% losses, while the visitors win merely 13% of their away fixtures with a hefty 60% defeat rate. Grasshopper is in dreadful form from their last five matches (only 0.6 points per game) and has a catastrophic away goal difference (-16). Servette scores an average of 1.47 goals per game at home, whereas Grasshopper concedes an average of 2.13 goals in away matches, further favoring the hosts. Although Servette's form is also not impressive (1.2 points per game), their home advantage and the visitors' weakness should tip the scales of victory in their favor.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

4 : 0
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

60Possession (%)40
ServetteGrasshopper
19Shots10
ServetteGrasshopper
8Shots on target5
ServetteGrasshopper
2.12xG1.24
ServetteGrasshopper
5Corners4
ServetteGrasshopper
51Dangerous attacks34
ServetteGrasshopper
5Fouls8
ServetteGrasshopper
0Cards2
ServetteGrasshopper

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

ServetteGrasshopper
1.6Goals scored / game1.27
ServetteGrasshopper
1.87Goals allowed / game1.87
ServetteGrasshopper
52%Average possession46%
ServetteGrasshopper
4.27Shots on target / game4.57
ServetteGrasshopper

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

13.23Shots per game13.27
ServetteGrasshopper
4.27Shots on target4.57
ServetteGrasshopper
12.1%Shot conversion9.5%
ServetteGrasshopper
52%Possession46%
ServetteGrasshopper
1.52xG for1.48
ServetteGrasshopper
1.44xG against1.59
ServetteGrasshopper

Shooting quality

Servette: BalancedGrasshopper: Balanced
ServetteGrasshopper
Accuracy (shots on target)32%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Servette is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / game - Servette · 0.6 pts / game - Grasshopper

Servette
DDDWL
Season result split
23% W40% R37% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-12-11
1.10 pts / game · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-7-5
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
DLDDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.47Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%
Grasshopper
LWLLL
Season result split
17% W30% R53% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-9-16
0.80 pts / game · goal difference -18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-4-9
Last 5 away
0-2-3
DLDLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.70Opponent xG: 1.59BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Servette is 26% better for: goals scored per game.

1.6 goals / game - Servette · 1.27 goals / game - Grasshopper

Servette scoring profile: very strong

Servette scores in 87% of games (26 of 30 meczów), while Grasshopper keeps a clean sheet in 13% (4 of 30 meczów).

Grasshopper scoring profile: very strong

Grasshopper scores in 73% of games (22 of 30 meczów), while Servette keeps a clean sheet in 13% (4 of 30 meczów).

48Goals scored (season)38
ServetteGrasshopper
56Goals conceded (season)56
ServetteGrasshopper
3.47Average goals per game3.13
ServetteGrasshopper
5Goals scored (last 5)5
ServetteGrasshopper
6Goals conceded (last 5)11
ServetteGrasshopper

How often they score at least...

87%1 goal73%
ServetteGrasshopper
43%2 goals27%
ServetteGrasshopper
20%3 goals17%
ServetteGrasshopper
10%4 goals3%
ServetteGrasshopper

How often they concede at least...

87%1 goal87%
ServetteGrasshopper
50%2 goals47%
ServetteGrasshopper
37%3 goals27%
ServetteGrasshopper
13%4 goals13%
ServetteGrasshopper

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

69%
League average

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time27%
ServetteGrasshopper
13%BTTS in both halves13%
ServetteGrasshopper
27%Scored in both halves23%
ServetteGrasshopper

BTTS and goal count

57%Min. 3 goals and BTTS43%
ServetteGrasshopper
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
ServetteGrasshopper
80%BTTS - last 560%
ServetteGrasshopper

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time73%
ServetteGrasshopper
47%Min. 2 goals before half-time37%
ServetteGrasshopper
23%Min. 3 goals before half-time23%
ServetteGrasshopper

2nd half

87%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
ServetteGrasshopper
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time57%
ServetteGrasshopper
33%Min. 3 goals after half-time30%
ServetteGrasshopper

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Grasshopper is 22% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.93 pts / game - Servette · 1.13 pts / game - Grasshopper

Servette - half-time state
20% leading33% draw47% trailing
Grasshopper - half-time state
23% leading43% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.93Points per game (1st half)1.13
ServetteGrasshopper
0.57Goals scored (1st half)0.6
ServetteGrasshopper
1.03Goals conceded (1st half)0.83
ServetteGrasshopper
1.6Average goals (1st half)1.43
ServetteGrasshopper
37%Clean sheet before half-time43%
ServetteGrasshopper
50%No goal before half-time57%
ServetteGrasshopper

After half-time (2nd half)

1.37Points per game (2nd half)0.9
ServetteGrasshopper
1.03Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
ServetteGrasshopper
0.83Goals conceded (2nd half)1.03
ServetteGrasshopper
1.87Average goals (2nd half)1.7
ServetteGrasshopper
40%Clean sheet after half-time30%
ServetteGrasshopper
37%No goal after half-time47%
ServetteGrasshopper

Servette - second-half results

37% W27% R37% P
28
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
-14
Goal difference (1st half)
41
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.93
PPG before half-time
Lead holding115%

Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 23%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.2

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Grasshopper - second-half results

17% W40% R43% P
34
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
-11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding74%

Leads at halftime in 23% of games and wins 17%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Servette - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.200.80
Goals scored / game0.40.6
Goals allowed / game0.40.8
Average goals per game0.81.4
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Grasshopper - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.000.40
Goals scored / game0.60.4
Goals allowed / game0.81.4
Average goals per game1.41.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-1-5
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Servette
ScoredConceded
6
14
0-15
6
9
16-30
5
8
31-45
8
10
46-60
6
7
61-75
17
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (17 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.

Grasshopper
ScoredConceded
8
5
0-15
3
10
16-30
7
10
31-45
4
10
46-60
7
15
61-75
9
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.31
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.7 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
70%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-55%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
64%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Servette

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.43
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
90%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
126%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
35% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
35%

Grasshopper

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.49
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
105%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League).

Teams vs league

ServetteLigaGrasshopper
Average goals per game 3.473.28 3.13
Both teams scored 77%69% 63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 63%67% 53%
Clean sheets 13%18% 13%
Goal before half-time 80%77% 73%
Goal after half-time 87%82% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.28
Average goals per game
69%
Both teams scored
67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
18%
Clean sheets
1.78
Home goals / game
1.49
Away goals / game
+19%
Home attack advantage
+16%
Home defensive advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
55%
2 goals
30%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. GrasshopperSubstitutionOn: Lovro ZvonarekOff: Felix Emmanuel Tsimba
  2. GrasshopperYellow cardAbdoulaye Diaby
  3. GrasshopperSubstitutionOn: Maximilian UllmannOff: Mouhamed El Bachir Ngom
  4. ServetteSubstitutionOn: Ablie JallowOff: Thomas Lopes
  5. GrasshopperYellow cardSimone Stroscio
  6. GrasshopperSubstitutionOn: Óscar Clemente MuesOff: Jonathan Asp Jensen
  7. ServetteSubstitutionOn: Lilian NjohOff: Bradley Mazikou

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Servette's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 0 losses against Grasshopper. Games average 1.50 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

Grasshopper Club Zürich
0 : 1
Servette FC
Servette FC
1 : 1
Grasshopper Club Zürich

FAQ

What was the result of Servette vs Grasshopper?

The Super League match finished Servette 5:0 Grasshopper. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Servette and Grasshopper?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Servette won 1, Grasshopper won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Servette vs Grasshopper?

Servette score 1.60 goals per game on average and Grasshopper 1.27. The Super League average is 3.28 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 67% of games. Both teams score in 77% of Servette's matches and 63% of Grasshopper's.

What form are Servette and Grasshopper in?

Over the last 5 games Servette have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Grasshopper 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Servette vs Grasshopper?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.