Switzerland - Super LeagueData current as of 20 July 2026

Servette vs Thun: match statistics

Servette crest
Servette
1 : 3half-time 0:1
Thun crest
Thun
120%(2.33)
X25%(3.40)
255%(2.60)

Thun are in significantly better form and sit top of the table, having won their last five matches in a row and scoring an impressive 17 goals during this period. The visitors boast an excellent away record with an 82% win rate and have not lost any of their last five fixtures. Servette are only in eighth place, with just an 18% win rate at home and a negative goal difference (-3) on their own ground. The hosts have averaged only 1.2 points per game in their last five matches, which contrasts sharply with Thun's perfect streak (3.0 PPG). Considering the visitors' qualitative edge, form, and offensive efficiency (averaging 2.18 goals per away game), Thun hold a clear advantage and should win this encounter.

Servette vs Thun: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Servette play Thun in Super League (Switzerland). The match date is 8 February 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 1:3.

Current form

Servette: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Thun: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Servette scores 1.87 and concedes 1.66 goals per match. Thun scores 2.11 and concedes 1.37. League average: 3.29 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Servette 68%, Thun 71%. Over 2.5: Servette 61%, Thun 74%. League level: BTTS 66%, Over 2.5 67%.

xG, shots and style

Thun has higher xG: 1.87 vs 1.59. Servette: 13.7 shots per match, Thun: 17.1.

Match halves

Servette: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 1.11. Thun: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 1.21.

Goals by minute

Servette: 76-90+ (20 goals). Thun: 46-60 (17 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Super League: 3.29 goals per match, BTTS 66%, Over 2.5 67%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 0-0-2. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 50%.

Match description

Thun are in significantly better form and sit top of the table, having won their last five matches in a row and scoring an impressive 17 goals during this period. The visitors boast an excellent away record with an 82% win rate and have not lost any of their last five fixtures. Servette are only in eighth place, with just an 18% win rate at home and a negative goal difference (-3) on their own ground. The hosts have averaged only 1.2 points per game in their last five matches, which contrasts sharply with Thun's perfect streak (3.0 PPG). Considering the visitors' qualitative edge, form, and offensive efficiency (averaging 2.18 goals per away game), Thun hold a clear advantage and should win this encounter.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
ServetteThun
12Shots14
ServetteThun
2Shots on target6
ServetteThun
1.34xG1.73
ServetteThun
5Corners6
ServetteThun
62Dangerous attacks60
ServetteThun
4Fouls3
ServetteThun
4Cards1
ServetteThun

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.87Goals scored / match2.11
ServetteThun
1.66Goals conceded / match1.37
ServetteThun
52%Average possession46%
ServetteThun
4.82Shots on target / match5.66
ServetteThun

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.74Shots per match17.05
ServetteThun
4.82Shots on target5.66
ServetteThun
13.6%Shot conversion12.3%
ServetteThun
52%Possession46%
ServetteThun
1.59xG for1.87
ServetteThun
1.36xG against1.65
ServetteThun

Shooting quality

Servette: Efficient finishingThun: Counter-attacking
ServetteThun
Accuracy (shots on target)35%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.390.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Servette is 1200% better for: last-5 form.

2.6 pts / match - Servette · 0.2 pts / match - Thun

Servette
WWDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
34% W37% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-14-11
1.39 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-7-5
Last 5 at home
5-0-0
WWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.99Opponent xG: 0.93BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Thun
LLLLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
63% W8% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
24-3-11
1.97 pts / match · goal difference +28
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
12-1-6
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 1.45Opponent xG: 2.15BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Thun is 13% better for: goals scored per match.

1.87 goals / match - Servette · 2.11 goals / match - Thun

Thun is 21% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.66 goals / match - Servette · 1.37 goals / match - Thun

Servette scoring profile: very strong

Servette scores in 89% of matches (34 of 38 matches), while Thun keeps a clean sheet in 16% (6 of 38 matches).

Thun scoring profile: very strong

Thun scores in 87% of matches (33 of 38 matches), while Servette keeps a clean sheet in 24% (9 of 38 matches).

71Goals scored (season)80
ServetteThun
63Goals conceded (season)52
ServetteThun
3.53Average goals in match3.47
ServetteThun
14Goals scored (last 5)5
ServetteThun
6Goals conceded (last 5)15
ServetteThun

How often they score at least...

89%1 goal87%
ServetteThun
53%2 goals63%
ServetteThun
26%3 goals37%
ServetteThun
13%4 goals18%
ServetteThun

How often they concede at least...

76%1 goal84%
ServetteThun
45%2 goals26%
ServetteThun
34%3 goals11%
ServetteThun
11%4 goals5%
ServetteThun

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time29%
ServetteThun
13%BTTS in both halves3%
ServetteThun
37%Scored in both halves39%
ServetteThun

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS66%
ServetteThun
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
ServetteThun
40%BTTS - last 560%
ServetteThun

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

79%Min. 1 goal before half-time76%
ServetteThun
45%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
ServetteThun
24%Min. 3 goals before half-time21%
ServetteThun

2nd half

89%Min. 1 goal after half-time87%
ServetteThun
53%Min. 2 goals after half-time55%
ServetteThun
32%Min. 3 goals after half-time26%
ServetteThun

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Thun is 28% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.26 pts / match - Servette · 1.61 pts / match - Thun

Servette - half-time state
32% leading32% draw37% trailing
Thun - half-time state
42% leading34% draw24% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.26Points per match (1st half)1.61
ServetteThun
0.76Goals scored (1st half)0.89
ServetteThun
0.87Goals conceded (1st half)0.66
ServetteThun
1.63Average goals (1st half)1.55
ServetteThun
47%Clean sheet before half-time50%
ServetteThun
45%No goal before half-time45%
ServetteThun

After half-time (2nd half)

1.58Points per match (2nd half)1.74
ServetteThun
1.11Goals scored (2nd half)1.21
ServetteThun
0.79Goals conceded (2nd half)0.71
ServetteThun
1.89Average goals (2nd half)1.92
ServetteThun
45%Clean sheet after half-time50%
ServetteThun
29%No goal after half-time29%
ServetteThun

Servette - second-half results

45% W24% R32% P
48
Half-time points
29
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
60
Second-half points
+12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.26
PPG before half-time
Lead holding106%

Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 34%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Thun - second-half results

47% W32% R21% P
61
Half-time points
34
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
66
Second-half points
+19
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.61
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 63%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Servette - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.602.40
Goals scored / match1.41.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match1.82.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal20%0%
Goal difference+5+3
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 7
Thun - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.40
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match1.21.8
Average goals in match1.82.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-3-7
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Servette
ScoredConceded
10
14
0-15
11
9
16-30
8
10
31-45
12
11
46-60
10
10
61-75
20
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (20 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): +11 - wins late phases.

Thun
ScoredConceded
9
8
0-15
11
9
16-30
14
8
31-45
17
5
46-60
12
7
61-75
17
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (17 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
107%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
70%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-29%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
77%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Servette

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
105%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
110%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+1.21
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

Thun

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.52
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
140%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
77%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-1.77
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League).

Teams vs league

ServetteLigaThun
Average goals in match 3.533.29 3.47
Both teams scored 68%66% 71%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 61%67% 74%
Clean sheets 24%19% 16%
Goal before half-time 79%76% 76%
Goal after half-time 89%85% 87%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.29
Average goals per match
66%
Both teams scored
67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
19%
Clean sheets
1.78
Home goals / match
1.51
Away goals / match
+18%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
57%
2 goals
31%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Servette 0 - 0 - 2 Thun. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Servette FC
0 : 1
FC Thun
FC Thun
3 : 1
Servette FC

FAQ

What was the result of Servette vs Thun?

The Super League match finished Servette 1:3 Thun. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Servette and Thun?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Servette won 0, Thun won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Servette vs Thun?

Servette score 1.87 goals per game on average and Thun 2.11. The Super League average is 3.29 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 67% of games. Both teams score in 68% of Servette's matches and 71% of Thun's.

What form are Servette and Thun in?

Over the last 5 games Servette have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Thun 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Servette vs Thun?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.