Shabana vs TransMara Sugar: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Shabana play TransMara Sugar in Kenyan Premier League (Kenya). The match date is 17 December 2025 at 13:00. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Shabana: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. TransMara Sugar: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Shabana scores 1.14 and concedes 1.07 goals per match. TransMara Sugar scores 0.93 and concedes 0.89. League average: 2.01 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Shabana 43%, TransMara Sugar 39%. Over 2.5: Shabana 39%, TransMara Sugar 29%. League level: BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 33%.

xG, shots and style

TransMara Sugar has higher xG: 1.54 vs 1.43. Shabana: 10.5 shots per match, TransMara Sugar: 11.3.

Match halves

Shabana: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.14. TransMara Sugar: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.21.

Goals by minute

Shabana: 0-15 (25 goals). TransMara Sugar: 0-15 (20 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Kenyan Premier League: 2.01 goals per match, BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 33%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
ShabanaTransMara Sugar
-1Shots-1
ShabanaTransMara Sugar
-1Shots on target-1
ShabanaTransMara Sugar
0xG0
ShabanaTransMara Sugar
5Corners6
ShabanaTransMara Sugar
88Dangerous attacks61
ShabanaTransMara Sugar
-1Fouls-1
ShabanaTransMara Sugar
-1Cards-1
ShabanaTransMara Sugar

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

ShabanaTransMara Sugar
1.14Goals scored / match0.93
ShabanaTransMara Sugar
1.07Goals conceded / match0.89
ShabanaTransMara Sugar
48%Average possession44%
ShabanaTransMara Sugar
3.32Shots on target / match2.68
ShabanaTransMara Sugar

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.54Shots per match11.25
ShabanaTransMara Sugar
3.32Shots on target2.68
ShabanaTransMara Sugar
10.8%Shot conversion8.3%
ShabanaTransMara Sugar
48%Possession44%
ShabanaTransMara Sugar
1.43xG for1.54
ShabanaTransMara Sugar
1.43xG against1.51
ShabanaTransMara Sugar

Shooting quality

Shabana: BalancedTransMara Sugar: Balanced
ShabanaTransMara Sugar
Accuracy (shots on target)31%24%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

TransMara Sugar is 33% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Shabana · 1.6 pts / match - TransMara Sugar

Shabana
LLWLW
Season result split
46% W25% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-7-8
1.64 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-2-5
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WWLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.48Opponent xG: 1.59BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
TransMara Sugar
DDLWW
Season result split
29% W46% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-13-7
1.32 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-9-2
Last 5 away
1-3-1
DDDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 1.46Opponent xG: 1.44BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Shabana is 23% better for: goals scored per match.

1.14 goals / match - Shabana · 0.93 goals / match - TransMara Sugar

TransMara Sugar is 20% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.07 goals / match - Shabana · 0.89 goals / match - TransMara Sugar

Shabana scoring profile: strong

Shabana scores in 82% of matches (23 of 28 matches), while TransMara Sugar keeps a clean sheet in 39% (11 of 28 matches).

TransMara Sugar scoring profile: mixed

TransMara Sugar scores in 57% of matches (16 of 28 matches), while Shabana keeps a clean sheet in 50% (14 of 28 matches).

32Goals scored (season)26
ShabanaTransMara Sugar
30Goals conceded (season)25
ShabanaTransMara Sugar
2.21Average goals in match1.82
ShabanaTransMara Sugar
4Goals scored (last 5)2
ShabanaTransMara Sugar
7Goals conceded (last 5)1
ShabanaTransMara Sugar

How often they score at least...

82%1 goal57%
ShabanaTransMara Sugar
18%2 goals29%
ShabanaTransMara Sugar
11%3 goals7%
ShabanaTransMara Sugar
4%4 goals0%
ShabanaTransMara Sugar

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal61%
ShabanaTransMara Sugar
36%2 goals18%
ShabanaTransMara Sugar
14%3 goals11%
ShabanaTransMara Sugar
4%4 goals0%
ShabanaTransMara Sugar

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

43%
League average

Goal patterns

7%BTTS at half-time4%
ShabanaTransMara Sugar
4%BTTS in both halves0%
ShabanaTransMara Sugar
4%Scored in both halves4%
ShabanaTransMara Sugar

BTTS and goal count

36%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
ShabanaTransMara Sugar
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
ShabanaTransMara Sugar
40%BTTS - last 50%
ShabanaTransMara Sugar

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

29%Min. 1 goal before half-time11%
ShabanaTransMara Sugar
11%Min. 2 goals before half-time7%
ShabanaTransMara Sugar
4%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
ShabanaTransMara Sugar

2nd half

25%Min. 1 goal after half-time21%
ShabanaTransMara Sugar
11%Min. 2 goals after half-time7%
ShabanaTransMara Sugar
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time4%
ShabanaTransMara Sugar

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Shabana is 39% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.29 pts / match - Shabana · 0.93 pts / match - TransMara Sugar

Shabana - half-time state
18% leading75% draw7% trailing
TransMara Sugar - half-time state
0% leading93% draw7% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.29Points per match (1st half)0.93
ShabanaTransMara Sugar
0.29Goals scored (1st half)0.04
ShabanaTransMara Sugar
0.18Goals conceded (1st half)0.14
ShabanaTransMara Sugar
0.46Average goals (1st half)0.18
ShabanaTransMara Sugar
86%Clean sheet before half-time89%
ShabanaTransMara Sugar
79%No goal before half-time96%
ShabanaTransMara Sugar

After half-time (2nd half)

1.04Points per match (2nd half)1.14
ShabanaTransMara Sugar
0.14Goals scored (2nd half)0.21
ShabanaTransMara Sugar
0.21Goals conceded (2nd half)0.14
ShabanaTransMara Sugar
0.36Average goals (2nd half)0.36
ShabanaTransMara Sugar
82%Clean sheet after half-time89%
ShabanaTransMara Sugar
86%No goal after half-time86%
ShabanaTransMara Sugar

Shabana - second-half results

7% W82% R11% P
36
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.29
PPG before half-time
Lead holding256%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

TransMara Sugar - second-half results

11% W82% R7% P
26
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.93
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Shabana - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.80
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match0.40.2
1 goal20%20%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
TransMara Sugar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.0
Average goals in match0.00.0
1 goal0%0%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Shabana
ScoredConceded
25
19
0-15
3
1
16-30
0
3
31-45
1
0
46-60
1
1
61-75
2
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (25 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (19). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

TransMara Sugar
ScoredConceded
20
18
0-15
0
1
16-30
0
2
31-45
1
1
46-60
3
1
61-75
2
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (20 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (18). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.01
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
41%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
47%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Shabana

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
112%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
108%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.44
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
6% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 78% come in the first quarter-hour.
6%

TransMara Sugar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.61
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.62
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
94%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
87%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.28
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
8% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 77% come in the first quarter-hour.
8%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kenyan Premier League).

Teams vs league

ShabanaLigaTransMara Sugar
Average goals in match 2.212.01 1.82
Both teams scored 43%43% 39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 39%33% 29%
Clean sheets 50%36% 39%
Goal before half-time 29%21% 11%
Goal after half-time 25%22% 21%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.01
Average goals per match
43%
Both teams scored
33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
36%
Clean sheets
1.02
Home goals / match
0.99
Away goals / match
+3%
Home attack advantage
+3%
Home defence advantage
+-2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
21%
1 goal
8%
2 goals
2%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
22%
1 goal
11%
2 goals
2%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Shabana vs TransMara Sugar?

The Kenyan Premier League match finished Shabana 0:0 TransMara Sugar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Shabana vs TransMara Sugar?

Shabana score 1.14 goals per game on average and TransMara Sugar 0.93. The Kenyan Premier League average is 2.01 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 33% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Shabana's matches and 39% of TransMara Sugar's.

What form are Shabana and TransMara Sugar in?

Over the last 5 games Shabana have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and TransMara Sugar 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Shabana vs TransMara Sugar?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.