Iran - Azadegan LeagueData current as of 16 July 2026

Shahrdari Noshahr vs Navad Urmia: match statistics

Shahrdari Noshahr vs Navad Urmia: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Shahrdari Noshahr play Navad Urmia in Azadegan League (Iran). The match date is 15 June 2026 at 15:30. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Shahrdari Noshahr: 0-4-1, 0.80 points/match. Navad Urmia: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Shahrdari Noshahr scores 0.55 and concedes 0.85 goals per match. Navad Urmia scores 0.50 and concedes 1.25. League average: 1.59 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Shahrdari Noshahr 33%, Navad Urmia 31%. Over 2.5: Shahrdari Noshahr 6%, Navad Urmia 19%. League level: BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 22%.

xG, shots and style

Shahrdari Noshahr has higher xG: 1.08 vs 0.79. Shahrdari Noshahr: 3.4 shots per match, Navad Urmia: 1.0.

Match halves

Shahrdari Noshahr: half-time lead 3%, second-half goals 0.42. Navad Urmia: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.25.

Goals by minute

Shahrdari Noshahr: 61-75 (5 goals). Navad Urmia: 31-45+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Azadegan League: 1.59 goals per match, BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 22%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

The favorite is Shahrdari Noshahr: at home they have an average xG of 1.38 and score 0.69 goals per match, while Navad Urmia away have xG 0.86 and score only 0.36 goals per match. Defensively the hosts are also superior — at home they concede 0.69 goals per match and record clean sheets in 46% of games, whereas the visitors concede 1.29 goals on average away and have only 14% clean sheets. The difference in chance quality is clear: the hosts average 9.29 shots and 4.29 on target per home match (conversion 9%), while Navad averages 6.75 shots and 2.25 on target away (conversion 4%). Risk factors include poor form for both teams over the last 5 matches — the hosts have not won in their last 5 (0 wins, 3 draws, 2 losses, 0.6 points per match) and conceded 4 goals, while the visitors have 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses (0.8 points per match) and conceded 10 goals in that period. Considering the season-long home advantage in xG, the number and quality of shots and better defense, I assign a 65% probability to a home win, 20% to a draw and 15% to an away win.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia
11Shots1
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia
4Shots on target1
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia
1.19xG0.26
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia
9Corners4
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia
32Dangerous attacks17
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia
-1Fouls-1
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia
-1Cards-1
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia
0.55Goals scored / match0.5
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia
0.85Goals conceded / match1.25
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia
26%Average possession12%
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia
1.21Shots on target / match-0.12
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

3.42Shots per match1
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia
1.21Shots on target-0.12
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia
15.9%Shot conversion50%
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia
26%Possession12%
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia
1.08xG for0.79
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia
1.12xG against1.3
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia

Shooting quality

Shahrdari Noshahr: Counter-attackingNavad Urmia: Counter-attacking
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia
Accuracy (shots on target)35%-12%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.320.79
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.450.00

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Shahrdari Noshahr is 300% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Shahrdari Noshahr · 0.2 pts / match - Navad Urmia

Shahrdari Noshahr
DDDLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
15% W45% R39% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-15-13
0.91 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-4-1
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-6-5
Last 5 at home
0-4-1
DLDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.31Opponent xG: 0.77BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 0%
Navad Urmia
DLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
13% W38% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-12-16
0.75 pts / match · goal difference -24
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-4-11
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 0.26Opponent xG: 1.19BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Shahrdari Noshahr is 10% better for: goals scored per match.

0.55 goals / match - Shahrdari Noshahr · 0.5 goals / match - Navad Urmia

Shahrdari Noshahr is 47% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.85 goals / match - Shahrdari Noshahr · 1.25 goals / match - Navad Urmia

Shahrdari Noshahr scoring profile: mixed

Shahrdari Noshahr scores in 45% of matches (15 of 33 matches), while Navad Urmia keeps a clean sheet in 28% (9 of 32 matches).

Navad Urmia scoring profile: mixed

Navad Urmia scores in 44% of matches (14 of 32 matches), while Shahrdari Noshahr keeps a clean sheet in 30% (10 of 33 matches).

18Goals scored (season)16
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia
28Goals conceded (season)40
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia
1.39Average goals in match1.75
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia
3Goals scored (last 5)1
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia
4Goals conceded (last 5)10
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia

How often they score at least...

45%1 goal44%
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia
6%2 goals3%
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia
3%3 goals3%
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia
0%4 goals0%
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia

How often they concede at least...

70%1 goal72%
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia
15%2 goals31%
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia
0%3 goals9%
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia
0%4 goals6%
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

33%
Shahrdari Noshahr - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.11 of 33 matches
30%
League average

Goal patterns

9%BTTS at half-time9%
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia
0%Scored in both halves3%
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia

BTTS and goal count

6%Min. 3 goals and BTTS9%
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia
60%BTTS - last 520%
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

39%Min. 1 goal before half-time53%
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia
12%Min. 2 goals before half-time22%
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia

2nd half

61%Min. 1 goal after half-time56%
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia
21%Min. 2 goals after half-time22%
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia
3%Min. 3 goals after half-time3%
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Navad Urmia is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.79 pts / match - Shahrdari Noshahr · 0.91 pts / match - Navad Urmia

Shahrdari Noshahr - half-time state
3% leading70% draw27% trailing
Navad Urmia - half-time state
13% leading53% draw34% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.79Points per match (1st half)0.91
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia
0.12Goals scored (1st half)0.25
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia
0.39Goals conceded (1st half)0.59
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia
0.52Average goals (1st half)0.84
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia
64%Clean sheet before half-time59%
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia
88%No goal before half-time78%
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia

After half-time (2nd half)

1.09Points per match (2nd half)0.94
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia
0.42Goals scored (2nd half)0.25
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia
0.45Goals conceded (2nd half)0.56
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia
0.88Average goals (2nd half)0.81
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia
55%Clean sheet after half-time56%
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia
67%No goal after half-time75%
Shahrdari NoshahrNavad Urmia

Shahrdari Noshahr - second-half results

18% W55% R27% P
26
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.79
PPG before half-time
Lead holding500%

Leads at half-time in 3% of matches and wins 15%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Navad Urmia - second-half results

13% W56% R31% P
29
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.91
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 13%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Shahrdari Noshahr - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.20
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match1.00.4
1 goal60%40%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
Navad Urmia - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.20
Goals scored / match0.20.0
Goals conceded / match0.81.2
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal80%100%
Goal difference-3-6
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Shahrdari Noshahr
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
2
2
16-30
2
9
31-45
4
3
46-60
5
2
61-75
5
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Navad Urmia
ScoredConceded
1
6
0-15
2
6
16-30
5
10
31-45
1
3
46-60
3
6
61-75
4
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.58
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
32%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-36%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
20%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
31%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 3 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Shahrdari Noshahr

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.53
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.27
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
61%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
125%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

Navad Urmia

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.51
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+10.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
74%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
139%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.55
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).

Teams vs league

Shahrdari NoshahrLigaNavad Urmia
Average goals in match 1.391.59 1.75
Both teams scored 33%30% 31%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 6%22% 19%
Clean sheets 30%46% 28%
Goal before half-time 39%46% 53%
Goal after half-time 61%57% 56%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.59
Average goals per match
30%
Both teams scored
22%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
46%
Clean sheets
0.90
Home goals / match
0.68
Away goals / match
+32%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
46%
1 goal
15%
2 goals
3%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Shahrdari Noshahr 0 - 0 - 1 Navad Urmia. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Navad Urmia FC
1 : 0
Shahrdari Noshahr FC

FAQ

What was the result of Shahrdari Noshahr vs Navad Urmia?

The Azadegan League match finished Shahrdari Noshahr 0:0 Navad Urmia. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Shahrdari Noshahr vs Navad Urmia?

Shahrdari Noshahr score 0.55 goals per game on average and Navad Urmia 0.50. The Azadegan League average is 1.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 22% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Shahrdari Noshahr's matches and 31% of Navad Urmia's.

What form are Shahrdari Noshahr and Navad Urmia in?

Over the last 5 games Shahrdari Noshahr have a 0-4-1 record (0.80 points per game) and Navad Urmia 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Shahrdari Noshahr vs Navad Urmia?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.