Shams Azar Qazvin vs Aluminium Arak: match statistics
Statistical analysis points to a balanced match between two teams from the bottom half of the table. Shams Azar Qazvin has an impressive percentage of draws in home matches (60%), confirming their tendency to share points at their own stadium. The hosts show stable form in the last five matches (1.6 points per match), while Aluminium Arak presents weaker away disposition (50% losses, only 20% wins). Both teams have similar problems with converting chances – the hosts with an efficiency of 13%, the guests just 7%. Considering the low efficiency of both teams, the hosts' high propensity for draws, and the guests' poor away form, the most likely result is a split of points.
Shams Azar Qazvin vs Aluminium Arak: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Shams Azar Qazvin played against Aluminium Arak in Persian Gulf Pro League (Iran). The game was played on February 13, 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Recent form
Shams Azar Qazvin has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Aluminium Arak has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Shams Azar Qazvin scores 0.75 goals per game and allows 0.80. Aluminium Arak scores 0.65 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 1.76 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 35% of Shams Azar Qazvin's games and 30% of Aluminium Arak's. The Over 2.5 rates are 15% and 20%, compared with league averages of 38% for BTTS and 27% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Shams Azar Qazvin has the higher season xG average, 0.94 to 0.91 per game. Shams Azar Qazvin takes 3.5 shots per game, while Aluminium Arak takes 2.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Shams Azar Qazvin leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.60 goals per game after halftime. Aluminium Arak leads at halftime in 20% and scores 0.25 after halftime.
When the teams score
Shams Azar Qazvin's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (4 goals). For Aluminium Arak, it is minutes 31-45+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Persian Gulf Pro League games average 1.76 goals. Both teams score in 38% of games, and 27% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Statistical analysis points to a balanced match between two teams from the bottom half of the table. Shams Azar Qazvin has an impressive percentage of draws in home matches (60%), confirming their tendency to share points at their own stadium. The hosts show stable form in the last five matches (1.6 points per match), while Aluminium Arak presents weaker away disposition (50% losses, only 20% wins). Both teams have similar problems with converting chances – the hosts with an efficiency of 13%, the guests just 7%. Considering the low efficiency of both teams, the hosts' high propensity for draws, and the guests' poor away form, the most likely result is a split of points.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Shams Azar Qazvin | Aluminium Arak | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 20% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.27 | 0.40 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.68 | 1.44 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Shams Azar Qazvin is 60% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - Shams Azar Qazvin · 1 pts / game - Aluminium Arak
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Shams Azar Qazvin is 15% better for: goals scored per game.
0.75 goals / game - Shams Azar Qazvin · 0.65 goals / game - Aluminium Arak
Shams Azar Qazvin is 25% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.8 goals / game - Shams Azar Qazvin · 1 goals / game - Aluminium Arak
Shams Azar Qazvin scores in 50% of games (10 of 20 meczów), while Aluminium Arak keeps a clean sheet in 35% (7 of 20 meczów).
Aluminium Arak scores in 55% of games (11 of 20 meczów), while Shams Azar Qazvin keeps a clean sheet in 50% (10 of 20 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Shams Azar Qazvin
Over / Under - Aluminium Arak
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Aluminium Arak is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.8 pts / game - Shams Azar Qazvin · 1.2 pts / game - Aluminium Arak
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Shams Azar Qazvin - second-half results
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Aluminium Arak - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 100% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Shams Azar Qazvin
Aluminium Arak
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Persian Gulf Pro League).
Teams vs league
| Shams Azar Qazvin | Liga | Aluminium Arak | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.55 | 1.76 | ▼ 1.65 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 35% | 38% | ▼ 30% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 15% | 27% | ▼ 20% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 42% | ▼ 35% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 30% | 53% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | • 60% | 61% | ▲ 65% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Record from Shams Azar Qazvin's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Aluminium Arak. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Shams Azar Qazvin vs Aluminium Arak?
The Persian Gulf Pro League match finished Shams Azar Qazvin 0:0 Aluminium Arak. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Shams Azar Qazvin vs Aluminium Arak?
Shams Azar Qazvin score 0.75 goals per game on average and Aluminium Arak 0.65. The Persian Gulf Pro League average is 1.76 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 27% of games. Both teams score in 35% of Shams Azar Qazvin's matches and 30% of Aluminium Arak's.
What form are Shams Azar Qazvin and Aluminium Arak in?
Over the last 5 games Shams Azar Qazvin have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Aluminium Arak 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Shams Azar Qazvin vs Aluminium Arak?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Shams Azar Qazvin vs Aluminium Arak: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.