Shams Azar Qazvin vs Foolad: match statistics
Statistical analysis points to a very even clash favoring a draw scenario. Shams Azar Qazvin shows poor home form with only 9% wins at their own stadium and a massive 64% draw rate, making them specialists in splitting points. Foolad also demonstrates a huge tendency for draws in away matches (70%), which is the highest metric in this matchup. Foolad is in better form over the last five matches (1.8 PPG vs 1.4 PPG) and remains unbeaten, giving them a slight edge. Both teams have identical averages for goals scored and conceded on their respective grounds (0.9-1.0), as well as similar xG values, confirming the balance of power. Given both teams' history of draws and their defensive approach, a split of points is the most probable outcome.
Shams Azar Qazvin vs Foolad: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Shams Azar Qazvin play Foolad in Persian Gulf Pro League (Iran). The match date is 27 February 2026 at 16:30. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
Shams Azar Qazvin: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Foolad: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Shams Azar Qazvin scores 0.65 and concedes 0.83 goals per match. Foolad scores 0.95 and concedes 0.73. League average: 1.79 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Shams Azar Qazvin 30%, Foolad 41%. Over 2.5: Shams Azar Qazvin 13%, Foolad 27%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 28%.
xG, shots and style
Foolad has higher xG: 0.98 vs 0.97. Shams Azar Qazvin: 3.3 shots per match, Foolad: 4.2.
Match halves
Shams Azar Qazvin: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.52. Foolad: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.73.
Goals by minute
Shams Azar Qazvin: 46-60 (4 goals). Foolad: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Persian Gulf Pro League: 1.79 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 28%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Match description
Statistical analysis points to a very even clash favoring a draw scenario. Shams Azar Qazvin shows poor home form with only 9% wins at their own stadium and a massive 64% draw rate, making them specialists in splitting points. Foolad also demonstrates a huge tendency for draws in away matches (70%), which is the highest metric in this matchup. Foolad is in better form over the last five matches (1.8 PPG vs 1.4 PPG) and remains unbeaten, giving them a slight edge. Both teams have identical averages for goals scored and conceded on their respective grounds (0.9-1.0), as well as similar xG values, confirming the balance of power. Given both teams' history of draws and their defensive approach, a split of points is the most probable outcome.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Shams Azar Qazvin | Foolad | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 17% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.30 | 0.23 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.58 | 1.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Foolad is 225% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Shams Azar Qazvin · 2.6 pts / match - Foolad
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Foolad is 46% better for: goals scored per match.
0.65 goals / match - Shams Azar Qazvin · 0.95 goals / match - Foolad
Foolad is 14% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.83 goals / match - Shams Azar Qazvin · 0.73 goals / match - Foolad
Shams Azar Qazvin scores in 43% of matches (10 of 23 matches), while Foolad keeps a clean sheet in 36% (8 of 22 matches).
Foolad scores in 55% of matches (12 of 22 matches), while Shams Azar Qazvin keeps a clean sheet in 48% (11 of 23 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Shams Azar Qazvin
Over / Under — Foolad
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Foolad is 28% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.78 pts / match - Shams Azar Qazvin · 1 pts / match - Foolad
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Shams Azar Qazvin - second-half results
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Foolad - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 3.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +5 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Shams Azar Qazvin
Foolad
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Persian Gulf Pro League).
Teams vs league
| Shams Azar Qazvin | Liga | Foolad | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.48 | 1.79 | ▼ 1.68 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 30% | 38% | ▲ 41% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 13% | 28% | • 27% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 48% | 41% | ▼ 36% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 30% | 54% | ▼ 45% |
| Goal after half-time | • 61% | 62% | ▲ 68% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Shams Azar Qazvin 1 - 0 - 0 Foolad. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Shams Azar Qazvin vs Foolad?
The Persian Gulf Pro League match finished Shams Azar Qazvin 0:2 Foolad. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Shams Azar Qazvin vs Foolad?
Shams Azar Qazvin score 0.65 goals per game on average and Foolad 0.95. The Persian Gulf Pro League average is 1.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 30% of Shams Azar Qazvin's matches and 41% of Foolad's.
What form are Shams Azar Qazvin and Foolad in?
Over the last 5 games Shams Azar Qazvin have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Foolad 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Shams Azar Qazvin vs Foolad?
The statistical background for Shams Azar Qazvin vs Foolad — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.