Shams Azar Qazvin vs Mes Rafsanjan: match statistics
Statistical analysis suggests a closely contested match with a high probability of a draw. Shams Azar Qazvin shows solid home form with a 67% draw rate and an impressive unbeaten run in their last 5 matches (1W-4D). The hosts are tough to beat at home, conceding just 0 goals in their last 5 matches. Mes Rafsanjan has a very poor away form (0% wins, 78% losses), but their overall last 5 matches show improvement (1W-2D-2L). The expected goals (xG) for both teams are similar, confirming their balanced strength. Considering the hosts' defensive solidity and the visitors' offensive struggles, the most likely outcome appears to be a draw or a narrow home win.
Shams Azar Qazvin vs Mes Rafsanjan: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Shams Azar Qazvin played against Mes Rafsanjan in Persian Gulf Pro League (Iran). The game was played on February 1, 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Recent form
Shams Azar Qazvin has 1 win, 4 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Mes Rafsanjan has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Shams Azar Qazvin scores 0.61 goals per game and allows 0.72. Mes Rafsanjan scores 0.61 and allows 1.39. Games in this league average 1.72 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 33% of Shams Azar Qazvin's games and 33% of Mes Rafsanjan's. The Over 2.5 rates are 11% and 33%, compared with league averages of 38% for BTTS and 26% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Shams Azar Qazvin has the higher season xG average, 0.94 to 0.87 per game. Shams Azar Qazvin takes 3.9 shots per game, while Mes Rafsanjan takes -0.1.
First-half and second-half trends
Shams Azar Qazvin leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.44 goals per game after halftime. Mes Rafsanjan leads at halftime in 6% and scores 0.33 after halftime.
When the teams score
Shams Azar Qazvin's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (4 goals). For Mes Rafsanjan, it is minutes 76-90+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Persian Gulf Pro League games average 1.72 goals. Both teams score in 38% of games, and 26% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 0.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Statistical analysis suggests a closely contested match with a high probability of a draw. Shams Azar Qazvin shows solid home form with a 67% draw rate and an impressive unbeaten run in their last 5 matches (1W-4D). The hosts are tough to beat at home, conceding just 0 goals in their last 5 matches. Mes Rafsanjan has a very poor away form (0% wins, 78% losses), but their overall last 5 matches show improvement (1W-2D-2L). The expected goals (xG) for both teams are similar, confirming their balanced strength. Considering the hosts' defensive solidity and the visitors' offensive struggles, the most likely outcome appears to be a draw or a narrow home win.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Shams Azar Qazvin | Mes Rafsanjan | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 0% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.24 | 0.00 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.46 | 0.00 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Shams Azar Qazvin is 75% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Shams Azar Qazvin · 0.8 pts / game - Mes Rafsanjan
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Shams Azar Qazvin is 93% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.72 goals / game - Shams Azar Qazvin · 1.39 goals / game - Mes Rafsanjan
Shams Azar Qazvin scores in 44% of games (8 of 18 meczów), while Mes Rafsanjan keeps a clean sheet in 33% (6 of 18 meczów).
Mes Rafsanjan scores in 39% of games (7 of 18 meczów), while Shams Azar Qazvin keeps a clean sheet in 50% (9 of 18 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Shams Azar Qazvin
Over / Under - Mes Rafsanjan
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Shams Azar Qazvin is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.83 pts / game - Shams Azar Qazvin · 0.72 pts / game - Mes Rafsanjan
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Shams Azar Qazvin - second-half results
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Mes Rafsanjan - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 6% of games and wins 11%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| 1 goal | 0% | 20% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 100% |
| No goal | 100% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Shams Azar Qazvin
Mes Rafsanjan
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Persian Gulf Pro League).
Teams vs league
| Shams Azar Qazvin | Liga | Mes Rafsanjan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.33 | 1.72 | ▲ 2.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 38% | ▼ 33% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 11% | 26% | ▲ 33% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 43% | ▼ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 28% | 51% | ▲ 61% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 56% | 60% | • 61% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Shams Azar Qazvin's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Mes Rafsanjan. Games average 0.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Shams Azar Qazvin vs Mes Rafsanjan?
The Persian Gulf Pro League match finished Shams Azar Qazvin 2:0 Mes Rafsanjan. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Shams Azar Qazvin vs Mes Rafsanjan?
Shams Azar Qazvin score 0.61 goals per game on average and Mes Rafsanjan 0.61. The Persian Gulf Pro League average is 1.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 26% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Shams Azar Qazvin's matches and 33% of Mes Rafsanjan's.
What form are Shams Azar Qazvin and Mes Rafsanjan in?
Over the last 5 games Shams Azar Qazvin have a 1-4-0 record (1.40 points per game) and Mes Rafsanjan 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Shams Azar Qazvin vs Mes Rafsanjan?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.