Shanghai SIPG vs Qingdao Youth Island: match statistics
Shanghai SIPG appears to have the upper hand in this clash, even though both teams occupy low positions in the table and have lost their fixtures so far this season. The hosts showcase much better attacking metrics, with an average xG of 2.51 per home match and 23 shots per game, while Qingdao Youth Island is yet to score away from home (FTS% 100%) and has a very weak xG of 1.04. Shanghai controls the game with 65% ball possession and registers an average of 6 shots on target per match, which should translate into goals. In away games, Qingdao manages a mere 1 shot on target per match with a 0% conversion rate, making them relatively unthreatening offensively. The form of both teams is poor, but the statistical superiority of Shanghai SIPG on their home pitch should dictate the outcome, although the hosts' poor efficiency (4% conversion rate) and the defensive issues of both squads could lead to a draw.
Shanghai SIPG vs Qingdao Youth Island: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Shanghai SIPG play Qingdao Youth Island in Chinese Super League (China). The match date is 15 March 2026 at 12:00. Final score: 4:1.
Current form
Shanghai SIPG: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Qingdao Youth Island: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Shanghai SIPG scores 1.56 and concedes 1.44 goals per match. Qingdao Youth Island scores 1.21 and concedes 1.53. League average: 3.09 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Shanghai SIPG 78%, Qingdao Youth Island 74%. Over 2.5: Shanghai SIPG 67%, Qingdao Youth Island 42%. League level: BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 59%.
xG, shots and style
Shanghai SIPG has higher xG: 1.33 vs 1.22. Shanghai SIPG: 10.9 shots per match, Qingdao Youth Island: 10.6.
Match halves
Shanghai SIPG: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 1.00. Qingdao Youth Island: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.68.
Goals by minute
Shanghai SIPG: 46-60 (7 goals). Qingdao Youth Island: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Chinese Super League: 3.09 goals per match, BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 59%.
Head-to-head
3 H2H matches: 0-2-1. Average goals 4.33, BTTS 100%.
Match description
Shanghai SIPG appears to have the upper hand in this clash, even though both teams occupy low positions in the table and have lost their fixtures so far this season. The hosts showcase much better attacking metrics, with an average xG of 2.51 per home match and 23 shots per game, while Qingdao Youth Island is yet to score away from home (FTS% 100%) and has a very weak xG of 1.04. Shanghai controls the game with 65% ball possession and registers an average of 6 shots on target per match, which should translate into goals. In away games, Qingdao manages a mere 1 shot on target per match with a 0% conversion rate, making them relatively unthreatening offensively. The form of both teams is poor, but the statistical superiority of Shanghai SIPG on their home pitch should dictate the outcome, although the hosts' poor efficiency (4% conversion rate) and the defensive issues of both squads could lead to a draw.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Shanghai SIPG | Qingdao Youth Island | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.43 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Qingdao Youth Island is 60% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Shanghai SIPG · 1.6 pts / match - Qingdao Youth Island
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Shanghai SIPG is 29% better for: goals scored per match.
1.56 goals / match - Shanghai SIPG · 1.21 goals / match - Qingdao Youth Island
Shanghai SIPG is 6% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.44 goals / match - Shanghai SIPG · 1.53 goals / match - Qingdao Youth Island
Shanghai SIPG scores in 89% of matches (16 of 18 matches), while Qingdao Youth Island keeps a clean sheet in 16% (3 of 19 matches).
Qingdao Youth Island scores in 79% of matches (15 of 19 matches), while Shanghai SIPG keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 18 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Shanghai SIPG
Over / Under — Qingdao Youth Island
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Shanghai SIPG - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Qingdao Youth Island - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Shanghai SIPG
Qingdao Youth Island
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Chinese Super League).
Teams vs league
| Shanghai SIPG | Liga | Qingdao Youth Island | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 3.00 | 3.09 | ▼ 2.74 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 78% | 65% | ▲ 74% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 67% | 59% | ▼ 42% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 11% | 19% | ▼ 16% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 61% | 70% | ▼ 68% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 94% | 89% | ▼ 74% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Shanghai SIPG 0 - 2 - 1 Qingdao Youth Island. Average goals 4.33, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Shanghai SIPG vs Qingdao Youth Island?
The Chinese Super League match finished Shanghai SIPG 4:1 Qingdao Youth Island. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Shanghai SIPG and Qingdao Youth Island?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Shanghai SIPG won 0, Qingdao Youth Island won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 4.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Shanghai SIPG vs Qingdao Youth Island?
Shanghai SIPG score 1.56 goals per game on average and Qingdao Youth Island 1.21. The Chinese Super League average is 3.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 78% of Shanghai SIPG's matches and 74% of Qingdao Youth Island's.
What form are Shanghai SIPG and Qingdao Youth Island in?
Over the last 5 games Shanghai SIPG have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Qingdao Youth Island 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Shanghai SIPG vs Qingdao Youth Island?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Shanghai SIPG vs Qingdao Youth Island: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.