Shanghai SIPG vs Qingdao Youth Island: match statistics
Shanghai SIPG appears to have the upper hand in this clash, even though both teams occupy low positions in the table and have lost their fixtures so far this season. The hosts showcase much better attacking metrics, with an average xG of 2.51 per home match and 23 shots per game, while Qingdao Youth Island is yet to score away from home (FTS% 100%) and has a very weak xG of 1.04. Shanghai controls the game with 65% ball possession and registers an average of 6 shots on target per match, which should translate into goals. In away games, Qingdao manages a mere 1 shot on target per match with a 0% conversion rate, making them relatively unthreatening offensively. The form of both teams is poor, but the statistical superiority of Shanghai SIPG on their home pitch should dictate the outcome, although the hosts' poor efficiency (4% conversion rate) and the defensive issues of both squads could lead to a draw.
Shanghai SIPG vs Qingdao Youth Island: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Shanghai SIPG played against Qingdao Youth Island in Chinese Super League (China). The game was played on March 15, 2026. Final score: 4:1.
Recent form
Shanghai SIPG has 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 0.00 points per game. Qingdao Youth Island has 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 0.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Shanghai SIPG scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 2.00. Qingdao Youth Island scores 0.00 and allows 2.00. Games in this league average 3.07 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 100% of Shanghai SIPG's games and 0% of Qingdao Youth Island's. The Over 2.5 rates are 100% and 0%, compared with league averages of 57% for BTTS and 57% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Shanghai SIPG has the higher season xG average, 2.51 to 1.04 per game. Shanghai SIPG takes 23.0 shots per game, while Qingdao Youth Island takes 11.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Shanghai SIPG leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.00 goals per game after halftime. Qingdao Youth Island leads at halftime in 0% and scores 0.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
Shanghai SIPG's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (1 goals). For Qingdao Youth Island, it is minutes 0-15 (0 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Chinese Super League games average 3.07 goals. Both teams score in 57% of games, and 57% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 2 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Shanghai SIPG appears to have the upper hand in this clash, even though both teams occupy low positions in the table and have lost their fixtures so far this season. The hosts showcase much better attacking metrics, with an average xG of 2.51 per home match and 23 shots per game, while Qingdao Youth Island is yet to score away from home (FTS% 100%) and has a very weak xG of 1.04. Shanghai controls the game with 65% ball possession and registers an average of 6 shots on target per match, which should translate into goals. In away games, Qingdao manages a mere 1 shot on target per match with a 0% conversion rate, making them relatively unthreatening offensively. The form of both teams is poor, but the statistical superiority of Shanghai SIPG on their home pitch should dictate the outcome, although the hosts' poor efficiency (4% conversion rate) and the defensive issues of both squads could lead to a draw.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Shanghai SIPG | Qingdao Youth Island | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 26% | 9% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.09 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.17 | 0.00 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Shanghai SIPG scores in 100% of games (1 of 1 meczów), while Qingdao Youth Island keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 meczów).
Qingdao Youth Island scores in 0% of games (0 of 1 meczów), while Shanghai SIPG keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Shanghai SIPG
Over / Under - Qingdao Youth Island
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Shanghai SIPG - second-half results
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Qingdao Youth Island - second-half results
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 2.0 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 3.0 | 0.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 0% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 100% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 100% |
| No goal | 0% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 2.0 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 0.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 0% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 100% |
| No goal | 100% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -2 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Shanghai SIPG
Qingdao Youth Island
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Chinese Super League).
Teams vs league
| Shanghai SIPG | Liga | Qingdao Youth Island | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 3.00 | 3.07 | ▼ 2.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 100% | 57% | ▼ 0% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 100% | 57% | ▼ 0% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 25% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 71% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 0% | 79% | ▼ 0% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Qingdao Youth IslandYellow cardHaiyang Fang
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Shanghai SIPG's perspective: 0 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses against Qingdao Youth Island. Games average 5.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Shanghai SIPG vs Qingdao Youth Island?
The Chinese Super League match finished Shanghai SIPG 4:1 Qingdao Youth Island. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Shanghai SIPG and Qingdao Youth Island?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Shanghai SIPG won 0, Qingdao Youth Island won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Shanghai SIPG vs Qingdao Youth Island?
Shanghai SIPG score 1.00 goals per game on average and Qingdao Youth Island 0.00. The Chinese Super League average is 3.07 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Shanghai SIPG's matches and 0% of Qingdao Youth Island's.
What form are Shanghai SIPG and Qingdao Youth Island in?
Over the last 5 games Shanghai SIPG have a 0-0-1 record (0.00 points per game) and Qingdao Youth Island 0-0-1 (0.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Shanghai SIPG vs Qingdao Youth Island?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Shanghai SIPG vs Qingdao Youth Island: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.