Sheffield United vs Wolverhampton Wanderers: match statistics
Sheffield United vs Wolverhampton Wanderers: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Sheffield United played against Wolverhampton Wanderers in Championship (England). The game was played on September 13, 2026. Venue: Bramall Lane. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
Sheffield United has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Wolverhampton Wanderers has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Sheffield United scores 1.33 goals per game and allows 1.33. Wolverhampton Wanderers scores 2.60 and allows 2.00. Games in this league average 2.89 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 67% of Sheffield United's games and 100% of Wolverhampton Wanderers's. The Over 2.5 rates are 67% and 100%, compared with league averages of 68% for BTTS and 64% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Wolverhampton Wanderers has the higher season xG average, 1.64 to 1.06 per game. Sheffield United takes 8.7 shots per game, while Wolverhampton Wanderers takes 16.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Sheffield United leads at halftime in 17% of its games and scores 0.33 goals per game after halftime. Wolverhampton Wanderers leads at halftime in 40% and scores 1.20 after halftime.
When the teams score
Sheffield United's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (3 goals). For Wolverhampton Wanderers, it is minutes 16-30 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Championship games average 2.89 goals. Both teams score in 68% of games, and 64% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Wolverhampton have shown a very similar points record to Sheffield United: both teams have averaged 2 points across their last five matches, but the visitors have won 3 of them and scored 13 goals during that period, compared with the hosts’ 10. Away from home, Wolves create more chances, averaging 14.67 shots and 4 on target per match, while Sheffield record 9 and 3.33 respectively at home. The visitors’ advantage is also reflected in their average goals scored away from home, at 2.33, compared with Sheffield’s 1.33 goals on home soil, while the hosts have failed to score in as many as 33% of their home matches. Wolves’ defense is, however, vulnerable to errors, conceding 2.33 goals per away match and keeping no clean sheets, so the hosts should have opportunities of their own. Wolves’ higher away xG of 1.48, compared with Sheffield’s 1.07 at home, together with their 16% conversion rate, nevertheless point to a narrow away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have recorded BTTS at a rate of 100% in the current competition, and neither has kept a clean sheet yet. Sheffield United score an average of 3.00 goals per match and concede 1.50, while Wolverhampton score 2.33 and concede 2.33. In their last five matches, the hosts averaged 2.0 goals scored and 1.8 conceded, while the visitors recorded 2.6 and 1.6 respectively, confirming consistent attacking activity from both sides. The chance-quality data is also favorable: Sheffield’s average xG stands at 1.88 and Wolverhampton’s at 1.48, with opponent xG allowed at 1.53 and 1.19 respectively. BTTS is significantly above the league average of 70%, making the most likely scenario one in which both teams score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Both teams have a very clear goalscoring profile: Sheffield United average 3.00 total goals per match, while Wolves average 2.33, with neither side having kept a clean sheet so far. In their last five matches, the hosts scored an average of 2.0 goals and conceded 1.8, while Wolves scored 2.6 and allowed opponents 1.6 goals. The 1.5 goals line has been covered in 100% of both teams' matches to date, while Over 2.5 goals has also landed in 100% of Sheffield United and Wolves fixtures. The hosts generate an average of 1.88 xG, compared with 1.48 xG for the visitors, while high averages of 5.5 and 4.0 shots on target indicate genuine potential for several goalscoring opportunities. The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals, as even after a more conservative adjustment for the high-scoring results from a small sample, the projected 3.20 goals gives this line a clear edge.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal points to Wolverhampton leading at the break and maintaining their advantage until full time: in their last five matches, the visitors were ahead after 45 minutes in 60% of games, compared with 40% for Sheffield United. Wolverhampton averaged 1.6 goals before half-time, while Sheffield United conceded 1.2 during this phase; the hosts, meanwhile, scored 1.4 goals and conceded 1.0. The visitors are also in a strong run of form, with three wins in their last five matches, and their average of 2.6 goals scored is higher than Sheffield United’s 2.0. The hosts have the better season-long xG, 1.88 compared with 1.48, so turnaround scenarios remain realistic; however, Wolves average 1.0 goal after half-time and have a positive second-half goal difference. Both teams regularly find the net, as confirmed by 100% of matches featuring goals from both sides in the seasonal data, but the visitors’ greater effectiveness early in matches favors the 2/2 outcome.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Sheffield United | Wolverhampton Wanderers | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.10 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.40 | 0.57 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Wolverhampton Wanderers is 95% better for: goals scored per game.
1.33 goals / game - Sheffield United · 2.6 goals / game - Wolverhampton Wanderers
Sheffield United is 50% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.33 goals / game - Sheffield United · 2 goals / game - Wolverhampton Wanderers
Sheffield United scores in 67% of games (4 of 6 games), while Wolverhampton Wanderers keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 5 games).
Wolverhampton Wanderers scores in 100% of games (5 of 5 games), while Sheffield United keeps a clean sheet in 33% (2 of 6 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Sheffield United
Over / Under - Wolverhampton Wanderers
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Wolverhampton Wanderers is 37% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.17 pts / game - Sheffield United · 1.6 pts / game - Wolverhampton Wanderers
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Sheffield United - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Wolverhampton Wanderers - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 2.4 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 2.6 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 0% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Sheffield United
Wolverhampton Wanderers
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Championship).
Teams vs league
| Sheffield United | Liga | Wolverhampton Wanderers | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.67 | 2.89 | ▲ 4.60 |
| Both teams scored | • 67% | 68% | ▲ 100% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 67% | 64% | ▲ 100% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 21% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 80% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 33% | 75% | ▲ 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Sheffield United vs Wolverhampton Wanderers?
The Championship match finished Sheffield United 0:1 Wolverhampton Wanderers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Sheffield United vs Wolverhampton Wanderers?
Sheffield United score 1.33 goals per game on average and Wolverhampton Wanderers 2.60. The Championship average is 2.89 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 64% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Sheffield United's matches and 100% of Wolverhampton Wanderers's.
What form are Sheffield United and Wolverhampton Wanderers in?
Over the last 5 games Sheffield United have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Wolverhampton Wanderers 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sheffield United vs Wolverhampton Wanderers?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Sheffield United vs Wolverhampton Wanderers: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


