Ireland - Premier DivisionTolka ParkData current as of 23 July 2026

Shelbourne vs Waterford: match statistics

Shelbourne crest
Shelbourne
2 : 1half-time 1:1
Waterford crest
Waterford

Shelbourne vs Waterford: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Shelbourne play Waterford in Premier Division (Ireland). The match date is 22 May 2026 at 20:45. Venue: Tolka Park. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Shelbourne: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Waterford: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Shelbourne scores 1.46 and concedes 1.46 goals per match. Waterford scores 1.38 and concedes 1.96. League average: 2.79 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Shelbourne 75%, Waterford 63%. Over 2.5: Shelbourne 67%, Waterford 50%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 53%.

xG, shots and style

Shelbourne has higher xG: 1.54 vs 1.38. Shelbourne: 13.8 shots per match, Waterford: 12.7.

Match halves

Shelbourne: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.83. Waterford: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.79.

Goals by minute

Shelbourne: 61-75 (9 goals). Waterford: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Premier Division: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 53%.

Head-to-head

5 H2H matches: 2-2-1. Average goals 2.20, BTTS 60%.

Match description

Shelbourne (5th) are favorites, primarily because they score 1.38 goals per home match versus Waterford's 0.88 goals per away game. The hosts generate 1.71 xG at home compared to the visitors' 1.29 xG on the road, and average 15.5 shots with 4.75 on target versus Waterford's 12.63 shots and 3.13 on target. Defensively the gap is clear: Shelbourne concede 1.88 goals per home match while Waterford concede 2.88 away, with average xG against of 1.40 vs 2.28 respectively. In the last 5 matches both teams scored 8 goals, but Shelbourne conceded 7 and Waterford 11, and the hosts averaged 1.6 points per match in that period versus 1.0 for the visitors. Additionally Shelbourne have a lower share of matches without scoring (25% vs 50%) and 25% clean sheets versus 0% for Waterford, therefore I assess the chances as 65% for the hosts, 20% for a draw and 15% for the away side.

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

69Possession (%)31
ShelbourneWaterford
19Shots7
ShelbourneWaterford
7Shots on target2
ShelbourneWaterford
2.07xG0.93
ShelbourneWaterford
3Corners2
ShelbourneWaterford
52Dangerous attacks47
ShelbourneWaterford
6Fouls15
ShelbourneWaterford
2Cards3
ShelbourneWaterford

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

ShelbourneWaterford
1.46Goals scored / match1.38
ShelbourneWaterford
1.46Goals conceded / match1.96
ShelbourneWaterford
52%Average possession38%
ShelbourneWaterford
4.38Shots on target / match3.83
ShelbourneWaterford

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.75Shots per match12.67
ShelbourneWaterford
4.38Shots on target3.83
ShelbourneWaterford
10.6%Shot conversion10.9%
ShelbourneWaterford
52%Possession38%
ShelbourneWaterford
1.54xG for1.38
ShelbourneWaterford
1.35xG against2.04
ShelbourneWaterford

Shooting quality

Shelbourne: BalancedWaterford: Balanced
ShelbourneWaterford
Accuracy (shots on target)32%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Waterford is 25% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Shelbourne · 2 pts / match - Waterford

Shelbourne
WDLDW
Season result split
33% W42% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-10-6
1.42 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-5-5
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WDWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.46BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%
Waterford
WLWWD
Season result split
17% W38% R46% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-9-11
0.88 pts / match · goal difference -14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-8
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LLDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.71Opponent xG: 1.87BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Shelbourne is 6% better for: goals scored per match.

1.46 goals / match - Shelbourne · 1.38 goals / match - Waterford

Shelbourne is 34% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.46 goals / match - Shelbourne · 1.96 goals / match - Waterford

Shelbourne scoring profile: very strong

Shelbourne scores in 83% of matches (20 of 24 matches), while Waterford keeps a clean sheet in 8% (2 of 24 matches).

Waterford scoring profile: very strong

Waterford scores in 67% of matches (16 of 24 matches), while Shelbourne keeps a clean sheet in 21% (5 of 24 matches).

35Goals scored (season)33
ShelbourneWaterford
35Goals conceded (season)47
ShelbourneWaterford
2.92Average goals in match3.33
ShelbourneWaterford
8Goals scored (last 5)12
ShelbourneWaterford
9Goals conceded (last 5)7
ShelbourneWaterford

How often they score at least...

83%1 goal67%
ShelbourneWaterford
58%2 goals38%
ShelbourneWaterford
4%3 goals25%
ShelbourneWaterford
0%4 goals8%
ShelbourneWaterford

How often they concede at least...

79%1 goal92%
ShelbourneWaterford
42%2 goals58%
ShelbourneWaterford
21%3 goals25%
ShelbourneWaterford
4%4 goals17%
ShelbourneWaterford

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

60%
League average

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time29%
ShelbourneWaterford
8%BTTS in both halves13%
ShelbourneWaterford
29%Scored in both halves33%
ShelbourneWaterford

BTTS and goal count

63%Min. 3 goals and BTTS42%
ShelbourneWaterford
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
ShelbourneWaterford
80%BTTS - last 560%
ShelbourneWaterford

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time92%
ShelbourneWaterford
42%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
ShelbourneWaterford
21%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
ShelbourneWaterford

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
ShelbourneWaterford
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time46%
ShelbourneWaterford
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time38%
ShelbourneWaterford

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Shelbourne is 21% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.21 pts / match - Shelbourne · 1 pts / match - Waterford

Shelbourne - half-time state
25% leading46% draw29% trailing
Waterford - half-time state
25% leading25% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.21Points per match (1st half)1
ShelbourneWaterford
0.63Goals scored (1st half)0.58
ShelbourneWaterford
0.71Goals conceded (1st half)0.92
ShelbourneWaterford
1.33Average goals (1st half)1.5
ShelbourneWaterford
50%Clean sheet before half-time29%
ShelbourneWaterford
54%No goal before half-time50%
ShelbourneWaterford

After half-time (2nd half)

1.42Points per match (2nd half)1.21
ShelbourneWaterford
0.83Goals scored (2nd half)0.79
ShelbourneWaterford
0.75Goals conceded (2nd half)1.04
ShelbourneWaterford
1.58Average goals (2nd half)1.83
ShelbourneWaterford
46%Clean sheet after half-time38%
ShelbourneWaterford
33%No goal after half-time50%
ShelbourneWaterford

Shelbourne - second-half results

29% W54% R17% P
29
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.21
PPG before half-time
Lead holding132%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Waterford - second-half results

33% W21% R46% P
24
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding68%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 17%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Shelbourne - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.60
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match1.20.6
Average goals in match2.01.4
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-2+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Waterford - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.80
Goals scored / match0.81.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.42.4
1 goal100%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+1+4
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Shelbourne
ScoredConceded
6
6
0-15
2
6
16-30
7
5
31-45
5
6
46-60
9
6
61-75
6
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (9 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Waterford
ScoredConceded
3
7
0-15
3
8
16-30
8
7
31-45
4
5
46-60
6
5
61-75
9
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.13
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
112%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
69%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-30%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Shelbourne

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
95%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
116%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Waterford

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.66
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
0.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
110%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
128%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+1.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premier Division).

Teams vs league

ShelbourneLigaWaterford
Average goals in match 2.922.79 3.33
Both teams scored 75%60% 63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 67%53% 50%
Clean sheets 21%24% 8%
Goal before half-time 67%75% 92%
Goal after half-time 75%79% 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.79
Average goals per match
60%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.53
Home goals / match
1.26
Away goals / match
+21%
Home attack advantage
+18%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Shelbourne 2 - 2 - 1 Waterford. Average goals 2.20, both teams scored in 60% matches.

Waterford
1 : 1
Shelbourne
Shelbourne FC
2 : 1
Waterford FC
Waterford FC
2 : 2
Shelbourne FC
Shelbourne FC
0 : 1
Waterford FC
Waterford FC
0 : 1
Shelbourne FC

FAQ

What was the result of Shelbourne vs Waterford?

The Premier Division match finished Shelbourne 2:1 Waterford. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Shelbourne and Waterford?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Shelbourne won 2, Waterford won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.20 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Shelbourne vs Waterford?

Shelbourne score 1.46 goals per game on average and Waterford 1.38. The Premier Division average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 75% of Shelbourne's matches and 63% of Waterford's.

What form are Shelbourne and Waterford in?

Over the last 5 games Shelbourne have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Waterford 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Shelbourne vs Waterford?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Shelbourne vs Waterford: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.