Iran - Azadegan LeagueKhalij Fars StadiumData current as of 23 July 2026

Shenavarsazi Qeshm vs Havadar: match statistics

Shenavarsazi Qeshm crest
Shenavarsazi Qeshm
3 : 0half-time 3:0
Havadar crest
Havadar

Shenavarsazi Qeshm vs Havadar: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Shenavarsazi Qeshm play Havadar in Azadegan League (Iran). The match date is 16 July 2026 at 18:15. Venue: Khalij Fars Stadium. Final score: 3:0.

Current form

Shenavarsazi Qeshm: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Havadar: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Shenavarsazi Qeshm scores 0.68 and concedes 1.06 goals per match. Havadar scores 0.94 and concedes 0.65. League average: 1.59 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Shenavarsazi Qeshm 32%, Havadar 26%. Over 2.5: Shenavarsazi Qeshm 26%, Havadar 21%. League level: BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 22%.

xG, shots and style

xG is very similar for both teams. Shenavarsazi Qeshm: 1.0 shots per match, Havadar: 2.4.

Match halves

Shenavarsazi Qeshm: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.35. Havadar: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.32.

Goals by minute

Shenavarsazi Qeshm: 0-15 (7 goals). Havadar: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Azadegan League: 1.59 goals per match, BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 22%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Havadar sit higher in the table (6th vs 14th) and in the last 5 matches has 3 wins and 2 draws (avg. 2.2 pts per match), while Shenavarsazi has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss (1.6 pts). Defensively the visitors have a clear advantage: Havadar conceded 19 goals this season versus 36 for the hosts, and away they concede only 0.5 goals on average with 69% clean sheets versus Shenavarsazi’s 0.94 goals conceded at home. The hosts, however, create more chances — home xG 1.38, 8 shots and 2.67 on target per match — while Havadar away has xG 0.6, 3.6 shots and 1.4 on target, but Shenavarsazi scores only 0.88 goals at home (below their xG), indicating poor finishing. Considering Havadar’s high 69% clean sheets and that the visitors fail to score in 44% of away matches, while the hosts underperform their chance creation, the most likely outcome is a low-scoring draw (most likely 0:0 or 1:1).

Half-by-half

3 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar
-1Shots-1
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar
-1Shots on target-1
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar
0xG0
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar
-1Corners-1
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar
0Dangerous attacks0
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar
-1Fouls-1
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar
-1Cards-1
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar
0.68Goals scored / match0.94
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar
1.06Goals conceded / match0.65
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar
14%Average possession23%
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar
-0.09Shots on target / match0.91
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

1.03Shots per match2.35
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar
-0.09Shots on target0.91
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar
65.7%Shot conversion40%
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar
14%Possession23%
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar
0.91xG for0.91
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar
1.43xG against0.78
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar

Shooting quality

Shenavarsazi Qeshm: Counter-attackingHavadar: Counter-attacking
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar
Accuracy (shots on target)-9%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.880.39
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.001.03

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Havadar is 25% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Shenavarsazi Qeshm · 2 pts / match - Havadar

Shenavarsazi Qeshm
WDLDW
Season result split
24% W32% R44% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-11-15
1.03 pts / match · goal difference -13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-5-5
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
LWWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.15Opponent xG: 1.81BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Havadar
WWWDL
Season result split
32% W50% R18% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-17-6
1.47 pts / match · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-7-4
Last 5 away
2-2-1
DDWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.36Opponent xG: 0.70BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Havadar is 38% better for: goals scored per match.

0.68 goals / match - Shenavarsazi Qeshm · 0.94 goals / match - Havadar

Havadar is 63% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.06 goals / match - Shenavarsazi Qeshm · 0.65 goals / match - Havadar

Shenavarsazi Qeshm scoring profile: more difficult

Shenavarsazi Qeshm scores in 50% of matches (17 of 34 matches), while Havadar keeps a clean sheet in 59% (20 of 34 matches).

Havadar scoring profile: mixed

Havadar scores in 56% of matches (19 of 34 matches), while Shenavarsazi Qeshm keeps a clean sheet in 35% (12 of 34 matches).

23Goals scored (season)32
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar
36Goals conceded (season)22
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar
1.74Average goals in match1.59
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar
10Goals scored (last 5)9
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar
7Goals conceded (last 5)6
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal56%
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar
9%2 goals29%
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar
6%3 goals6%
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar
3%4 goals3%
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar

How often they concede at least...

65%1 goal41%
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar
32%2 goals18%
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar
9%3 goals6%
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar
0%4 goals0%
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

32%
Shenavarsazi Qeshm - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.11 of 34 matches
30%
League average

Goal patterns

6%BTTS at half-time15%
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar
3%Scored in both halves15%
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar

BTTS and goal count

18%Min. 3 goals and BTTS15%
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar
80%BTTS - last 540%
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

44%Min. 1 goal before half-time53%
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar
18%Min. 2 goals before half-time21%
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar

2nd half

56%Min. 1 goal after half-time47%
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar
29%Min. 2 goals after half-time12%
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar
3%Min. 3 goals after half-time3%
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Havadar is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Shenavarsazi Qeshm · 1.5 pts / match - Havadar

Shenavarsazi Qeshm - half-time state
15% leading56% draw29% trailing
Havadar - half-time state
32% leading53% draw15% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.5
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar
0.32Goals scored (1st half)0.53
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar
0.41Goals conceded (1st half)0.35
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar
0.74Average goals (1st half)0.88
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar
71%Clean sheet before half-time71%
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar
79%No goal before half-time62%
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar

After half-time (2nd half)

0.94Points per match (2nd half)1.26
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar
0.35Goals scored (2nd half)0.32
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar
0.56Goals conceded (2nd half)0.29
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar
0.91Average goals (2nd half)0.62
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar
53%Clean sheet after half-time76%
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar
68%No goal after half-time71%
Shenavarsazi QeshmHavadar

Shenavarsazi Qeshm - second-half results

9% W68% R24% P
34
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding160%

Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Havadar - second-half results

24% W56% R21% P
51
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
43
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Shenavarsazi Qeshm - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.80
Goals scored / match1.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match1.61.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+4-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6
Havadar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.401.60
Goals scored / match1.40.4
Goals conceded / match1.00.2
Average goals in match2.40.6
1 goal100%60%
2 goals60%0%
3 goals60%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+2+1
Half-time: 80% leading - 0% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 7

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Shenavarsazi Qeshm
ScoredConceded
7
6
0-15
0
6
16-30
4
5
31-45
3
7
46-60
3
4
61-75
6
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Havadar
ScoredConceded
7
3
0-15
6
5
16-30
8
4
31-45
6
2
46-60
2
1
61-75
3
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.67
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.7 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
29%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+20%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
28%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
22%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Shenavarsazi Qeshm

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.52
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.37
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
76%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
154%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.57
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 30% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

Havadar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-19.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
136%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
72%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.53
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
9% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 22% come in the first quarter-hour.
9%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).

Teams vs league

Shenavarsazi QeshmLigaHavadar
Average goals in match 1.741.59 1.59
Both teams scored 32%30% 26%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 26%22% 21%
Clean sheets 35%46% 59%
Goal before half-time 44%46% 53%
Goal after half-time 56%57% 47%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.59
Average goals per match
30%
Both teams scored
22%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
46%
Clean sheets
0.90
Home goals / match
0.69
Away goals / match
+30%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
46%
1 goal
15%
2 goals
3%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Shenavarsazi Qeshm 0 - 0 - 1 Havadar. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Shenavarsazi Qeshm vs Havadar?

The Azadegan League match finished Shenavarsazi Qeshm 3:0 Havadar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Shenavarsazi Qeshm vs Havadar?

Shenavarsazi Qeshm score 0.68 goals per game on average and Havadar 0.94. The Azadegan League average is 1.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 22% of games. Both teams score in 32% of Shenavarsazi Qeshm's matches and 26% of Havadar's.

What form are Shenavarsazi Qeshm and Havadar in?

Over the last 5 games Shenavarsazi Qeshm have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Havadar 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Shenavarsazi Qeshm vs Havadar?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.