Shenavarsazi Qeshm vs Sanat Naft: match statistics
Sanat Naft is showing significantly better form in their last five matches, averaging 2.4 points per game compared to Shenavarsazi Qeshm's 1.2. The visitors hold third place in the table with a record of 11 wins, while the hosts find themselves in fifteenth position with just four victories this season. In their last five outings, Sanat Naft has secured four wins, scoring ten goals and conceding only three, which points to high offensive efficiency and a solid defense. Shenavarsazi Qeshm struggles with effectiveness – they fail to score in 40% of their home matches, and their average xG (1.38) is lower than that of the away side (1.34 on the road). The difference in goal difference (+1 for the away side compared to -2 for the hosts at home) along with the clear form advantage indicates a higher probability of a Sanat Naft victory.
Shenavarsazi Qeshm vs Sanat Naft: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Shenavarsazi Qeshm played against Sanat Naft in Azadegan League (Iran). The game was played on February 22, 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
Shenavarsazi Qeshm has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Sanat Naft has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Shenavarsazi Qeshm scores 0.45 goals per game and allows 1.00. Sanat Naft scores 1.18 and allows 0.59. Games in this league average 1.53 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 27% of Shenavarsazi Qeshm's games and 45% of Sanat Naft's. The Over 2.5 rates are 23% and 32%, compared with league averages of 33% for BTTS and 22% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Sanat Naft has the higher season xG average, 1.20 to 0.90 per game. Shenavarsazi Qeshm takes 1.6 shots per game, while Sanat Naft takes 5.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Shenavarsazi Qeshm leads at halftime in 9% of its games and scores 0.27 goals per game after halftime. Sanat Naft leads at halftime in 9% and scores 0.91 after halftime.
When the teams score
Shenavarsazi Qeshm's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (3 goals). For Sanat Naft, it is minutes 46-60 (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Azadegan League games average 1.53 goals. Both teams score in 33% of games, and 22% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Sanat Naft is showing significantly better form in their last five matches, averaging 2.4 points per game compared to Shenavarsazi Qeshm's 1.2. The visitors hold third place in the table with a record of 11 wins, while the hosts find themselves in fifteenth position with just four victories this season. In their last five outings, Sanat Naft has secured four wins, scoring ten goals and conceding only three, which points to high offensive efficiency and a solid defense. Shenavarsazi Qeshm struggles with effectiveness – they fail to score in 40% of their home matches, and their average xG (1.38) is lower than that of the away side (1.34 on the road). The difference in goal difference (+1 for the away side compared to -2 for the hosts at home) along with the clear form advantage indicates a higher probability of a Sanat Naft victory.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Shenavarsazi Qeshm | Sanat Naft | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 6% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.58 | 0.24 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 5.00 | 0.74 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Sanat Naft is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - Shenavarsazi Qeshm · 2.4 pts / game - Sanat Naft
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sanat Naft is 162% better for: goals scored per game.
0.45 goals / game - Shenavarsazi Qeshm · 1.18 goals / game - Sanat Naft
Sanat Naft is 69% better for: goals allowed per game.
1 goals / game - Shenavarsazi Qeshm · 0.59 goals / game - Sanat Naft
Shenavarsazi Qeshm scores in 41% of games (9 of 22 meczów), while Sanat Naft keeps a clean sheet in 45% (10 of 22 meczów).
Sanat Naft scores in 73% of games (16 of 22 meczów), while Shenavarsazi Qeshm keeps a clean sheet in 36% (8 of 22 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Shenavarsazi Qeshm
Over / Under - Sanat Naft
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Sanat Naft is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.91 pts / game - Shenavarsazi Qeshm · 1.09 pts / game - Sanat Naft
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Shenavarsazi Qeshm - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 9% of games and wins 18%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Sanat Naft - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 9% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +6 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Shenavarsazi Qeshm
Sanat Naft
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).
Teams vs league
| Shenavarsazi Qeshm | Liga | Sanat Naft | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 1.45 | 1.53 | ▲ 1.77 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 27% | 33% | ▲ 45% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 23% | 22% | ▲ 32% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 36% | 45% | • 45% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 36% | 46% | ▼ 36% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 50% | 57% | ▲ 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Record from Shenavarsazi Qeshm's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Sanat Naft. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Shenavarsazi Qeshm vs Sanat Naft?
The Azadegan League match finished Shenavarsazi Qeshm 1:0 Sanat Naft. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Shenavarsazi Qeshm vs Sanat Naft?
Shenavarsazi Qeshm score 0.45 goals per game on average and Sanat Naft 1.18. The Azadegan League average is 1.53 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 22% of games. Both teams score in 27% of Shenavarsazi Qeshm's matches and 45% of Sanat Naft's.
What form are Shenavarsazi Qeshm and Sanat Naft in?
Over the last 5 games Shenavarsazi Qeshm have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Sanat Naft 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Shenavarsazi Qeshm vs Sanat Naft?
The statistical background for Shenavarsazi Qeshm vs Sanat Naft — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.