Shenzhen Juniors vs Nanjing City: match statistics
Shenzhen Juniors vs Nanjing City: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Shenzhen Juniors played against Nanjing City in China League One (China). The game was played on August 23, 2026. Final score: 3:1.
Recent form
Shenzhen Juniors has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Nanjing City has 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses, with 0.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Shenzhen Juniors scores 1.47 goals per game and allows 1.11. Nanjing City scores 0.95 and allows 1.11. Games in this league average 2.68 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 26% of Shenzhen Juniors's games and 58% of Nanjing City's. The Over 2.5 rates are 47% and 32%, compared with league averages of 56% for BTTS and 53% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Shenzhen Juniors has the higher season xG average, 1.42 to 1.31 per game. Shenzhen Juniors takes 11.1 shots per game, while Nanjing City takes 12.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Shenzhen Juniors leads at halftime in 32% of its games and scores 0.79 goals per game after halftime. Nanjing City leads at halftime in 32% and scores 0.32 after halftime.
When the teams score
Shenzhen Juniors's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). For Nanjing City, it is minutes 31-45+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
China League One games average 2.68 goals. Both teams score in 56% of games, and 53% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 4.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Shenzhen Juniors sit in 2nd place, while Nanjing City are only 11th, and over their last five matches the hosts have averaged 1.6 points per game compared with 0.6 for the visitors. At home, Shenzhen concede just 0.78 goals per match and keep a clean sheet in 67% of their games, in stark contrast to Nanjing’s 1.22 goals conceded and just 11% clean-sheet rate away from home. The hosts also create better chances: their average xG is 1.63 compared with 1.20 for their opponents, while they manage 4.89 shots on target per match—almost twice Nanjing’s 2.44. The visitors are winless in their last five matches, recording 3 draws and 2 defeats, and lose 56% of their away fixtures. The draw remains a possibility, as Shenzhen win 44% of their home matches and draw 44% as well, but the defensive advantage and superior chance creation strongly favor the hosts.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal BTTS indicators are moderately high, standing at 60% for Shenzhen Juniors and 56% for Nanjing City; however, current form clearly weakens the scenario of both teams scoring. Shenzhen has scored just 2 goals in its last 5 matches, averaging 0.4 per game, and BTTS - Yes has not landed once during this period. Nanjing averages 0.8 goals across its last five appearances and fails to score in 33% of its matches this season, increasing the risk that the visitors will be held scoreless. The hosts keep a clean sheet in 30% of their matches, while Nanjing has a low shot conversion rate of 6%, compared with Shenzhen's 10%. Although Nanjing recorded BTTS - Yes in 80% of its last five matches, the low goal production of both teams and Shenzhen's defensive form, having conceded just 3 goals during this period, marginally support BTTS - No. BTTS - No means that at least one team fails to score; it does not automatically mean a 0:0 draw or that neither team will score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The goal profile points to a low-chance match: Nanjing City average only 0.67 goals scored, while Shenzhen Juniors concede an average of 1.00 goal. In their last five matches, the hosts scored just 2 goals, while the visitors scored 4, equating to 0.4 and 0.8 per game, respectively. The 3.5 line went Under in 80% of Shenzhen’s matches and in all of Nanjing City’s games, while neither team has recorded a match with more than 4.5 goals. Recent form also supports a low-scoring outcome, as only 20% of each team’s last five matches went Over 2.5 goals. The estimated total of 1.95 goals gives a clear edge to Under 3.5 goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Shenzhen Juniors have the clearer full-match profile: they score an average of 1.20 goals and concede 1.00, while Nanjing City score just 0.67 and allow opponents 1.22. The hosts have won 40% of their matches, compared with only 11% for the visitors, and have collected 1.6 points per game over their last five matches versus Nanjing’s 0.6, with Nanjing failing to win any of those fixtures. Before the break, Shenzhen average 0.80 goals, almost twice Nanjing’s 0.44, while the visitors have been trailing at half-time in 60% of their last five appearances. The hosts’ advantage is also evident in chance creation: their xG stands at 1.41 compared with 1.20, and they average 3.30 shots on target against the opponents’ 2.44. The most likely scenario is therefore Shenzhen leading at the break and maintaining their advantage until full-time, although the hosts’ 40% half-time draw rate leaves a significant chance of an X/1 turnaround.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Shenzhen Juniors | Nanjing City | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 24% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Shenzhen Juniors is 167% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - Shenzhen Juniors · 0.6 pts / game - Nanjing City
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Shenzhen Juniors is 55% better for: goals scored per game.
1.47 goals / game - Shenzhen Juniors · 0.95 goals / game - Nanjing City
Shenzhen Juniors scores in 63% of games (12 of 19 meczów), while Nanjing City keeps a clean sheet in 21% (4 of 19 meczów).
Nanjing City scores in 74% of games (14 of 19 meczów), while Shenzhen Juniors keeps a clean sheet in 58% (11 of 19 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Shenzhen Juniors
Over / Under - Nanjing City
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Shenzhen Juniors is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.42 pts / game - Shenzhen Juniors · 1.32 pts / game - Nanjing City
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Shenzhen Juniors - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 32% of games and wins 47%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Nanjing City - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 32% of games and wins 26%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Shenzhen Juniors
Nanjing City
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (China League One).
Teams vs league
| Shenzhen Juniors | Liga | Nanjing City | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.58 | 2.68 | ▼ 2.05 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 26% | 56% | ▲ 58% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 47% | 53% | ▼ 32% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 58% | 26% | ▼ 21% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 58% | 71% | ▲ 84% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 68% | 72% | ▼ 68% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Shenzhen Juniors's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Nanjing City. Games average 4.67 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Shenzhen Juniors vs Nanjing City?
The China League One match finished Shenzhen Juniors 3:1 Nanjing City. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Shenzhen Juniors and Nanjing City?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Shenzhen Juniors won 2, Nanjing City won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Shenzhen Juniors vs Nanjing City?
Shenzhen Juniors score 1.47 goals per game on average and Nanjing City 0.95. The China League One average is 2.68 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 26% of Shenzhen Juniors's matches and 58% of Nanjing City's.
What form are Shenzhen Juniors and Nanjing City in?
Over the last 5 games Shenzhen Juniors have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Nanjing City 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Shenzhen Juniors vs Nanjing City?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


