India - I-LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Shillong Lajong vs Aizawl: match statistics

Shillong Lajong crest
Shillong Lajong
6 : 1half-time 2:0
Aizawl crest
Aizawl

Shillong Lajong vs Aizawl: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Shillong Lajong play Aizawl in I-League (India). The match date is 18 April 2026 at 15:00. Final score: 6:1.

Current form

Shillong Lajong: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Aizawl: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Shillong Lajong scores 1.93 and concedes 0.86 goals per match. Aizawl scores 1.50 and concedes 2.25. League average: 3.03 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Shillong Lajong 50%, Aizawl 83%. Over 2.5: Shillong Lajong 50%, Aizawl 75%. League level: BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Shillong Lajong has higher xG: 1.49 vs 1.43. Shillong Lajong: 9.5 shots per match, Aizawl: 9.3.

Match halves

Shillong Lajong: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 1.21. Aizawl: half-time lead 8%, second-half goals 1.08.

Goals by minute

Shillong Lajong: 31-45+ (7 goals). Aizawl: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

I-League: 3.03 goals per match, BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 1-1-0. Average goals 6.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

The odds favor Shillong Lajong: the hosts average 1.6 points per match in their last 5 fixtures versus 0.8 points for Aizawl and sit higher in the standings (4th at home vs 7th for the visitors). Defensively Aizawl are vulnerable — they concede 2.25 goals on average away and have allowed 12 goals in their last 5 matches (2.4 per game), while Shillong concede 1.33 at home on average and have conceded just 4 goals in their last 5 matches (0.8 per game). Quality of created chances by xG is similar (1.37 for the hosts at home vs 1.38 for Aizawl away), but Shillong are markedly more efficient in finishing — conversion 17% versus 9% — and score on average 1.33 goals at home compared to 1.00 away for the visitors. The visitors register more shots and shots on target (avg. 11.5 shots and 3.5 on target vs 8 and 2.67), yet they have 25% of away games without a goal versus 0% for the hosts, which, combined with better ball control (56% possession vs 48%) and more stable form (Shillong in last 5: 2 wins, 2 draws, 1 loss), points to a home win.

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
4 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

44Possession (%)56
Shillong LajongAizawl
12Shots11
Shillong LajongAizawl
7Shots on target4
Shillong LajongAizawl
1.87xG1.87
Shillong LajongAizawl
6Corners11
Shillong LajongAizawl
86Dangerous attacks123
Shillong LajongAizawl
-1Fouls-1
Shillong LajongAizawl
1Cards2
Shillong LajongAizawl

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Shillong LajongAizawl
1.93Goals scored / match1.5
Shillong LajongAizawl
0.86Goals conceded / match2.25
Shillong LajongAizawl
54%Average possession47%
Shillong LajongAizawl
4Shots on target / match3.92
Shillong LajongAizawl

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.5Shots per match9.25
Shillong LajongAizawl
4Shots on target3.92
Shillong LajongAizawl
20.3%Shot conversion16.2%
Shillong LajongAizawl
54%Possession47%
Shillong LajongAizawl
1.49xG for1.43
Shillong LajongAizawl
1.37xG against1.65
Shillong LajongAizawl

Shooting quality

Shillong Lajong: Efficient finishingAizawl: Counter-attacking
Shillong LajongAizawl
Accuracy (shots on target)42%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.480.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Shillong Lajong is 175% better for: last-5 form.

2.2 pts / match - Shillong Lajong · 0.8 pts / match - Aizawl

Shillong Lajong
DWDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W36% R14% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-5-2
1.86 pts / match · goal difference +15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-2-1
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
LWDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.61Opponent xG: 1.33BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Aizawl
LLWDL
Season result split
25% W33% R42% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-4-5
1.08 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-3-3
Last 5 away
0-2-3
LDLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.57Opponent xG: 1.61BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Shillong Lajong is 29% better for: goals scored per match.

1.93 goals / match - Shillong Lajong · 1.5 goals / match - Aizawl

Shillong Lajong is 162% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.86 goals / match - Shillong Lajong · 2.25 goals / match - Aizawl

Shillong Lajong scoring profile: very strong

Shillong Lajong scores in 79% of matches (11 of 14 matches), while Aizawl keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 12 matches).

Aizawl scoring profile: strong

Aizawl scores in 83% of matches (10 of 12 matches), while Shillong Lajong keeps a clean sheet in 43% (6 of 14 matches).

27Goals scored (season)18
Shillong LajongAizawl
12Goals conceded (season)27
Shillong LajongAizawl
2.79Average goals in match3.75
Shillong LajongAizawl
12Goals scored (last 5)6
Shillong LajongAizawl
3Goals conceded (last 5)14
Shillong LajongAizawl

How often they score at least...

79%1 goal83%
Shillong LajongAizawl
50%2 goals50%
Shillong LajongAizawl
29%3 goals17%
Shillong LajongAizawl
21%4 goals0%
Shillong LajongAizawl

How often they concede at least...

57%1 goal100%
Shillong LajongAizawl
21%2 goals67%
Shillong LajongAizawl
7%3 goals25%
Shillong LajongAizawl
0%4 goals17%
Shillong LajongAizawl

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

64%
League average

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time25%
Shillong LajongAizawl
7%BTTS in both halves8%
Shillong LajongAizawl
43%Scored in both halves17%
Shillong LajongAizawl

BTTS and goal count

29%Min. 3 goals and BTTS67%
Shillong LajongAizawl
21%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
Shillong LajongAizawl
40%BTTS - last 580%
Shillong LajongAizawl

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

79%Min. 1 goal before half-time92%
Shillong LajongAizawl
43%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
Shillong LajongAizawl
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
Shillong LajongAizawl

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time92%
Shillong LajongAizawl
29%Min. 2 goals after half-time75%
Shillong LajongAizawl
21%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
Shillong LajongAizawl

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Shillong Lajong is 171% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.57 pts / match - Shillong Lajong · 0.58 pts / match - Aizawl

Shillong Lajong - half-time state
43% leading29% draw29% trailing
Aizawl - half-time state
8% leading33% draw58% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.57Points per match (1st half)0.58
Shillong LajongAizawl
0.71Goals scored (1st half)0.42
Shillong LajongAizawl
0.57Goals conceded (1st half)1.25
Shillong LajongAizawl
1.29Average goals (1st half)1.67
Shillong LajongAizawl
57%Clean sheet before half-time17%
Shillong LajongAizawl
50%No goal before half-time67%
Shillong LajongAizawl

After half-time (2nd half)

2.29Points per match (2nd half)1.5
Shillong LajongAizawl
1.21Goals scored (2nd half)1.08
Shillong LajongAizawl
0.29Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Shillong LajongAizawl
1.5Average goals (2nd half)2.08
Shillong LajongAizawl
71%Clean sheet after half-time42%
Shillong LajongAizawl
29%No goal after half-time33%
Shillong LajongAizawl

Shillong Lajong - second-half results

71% W14% R14% P
22
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
+13
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.57
PPG before half-time
Lead holding116%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Aizawl - second-half results

42% W25% R33% P
7
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.58
PPG before half-time
Lead holding313%

Leads at half-time in 8% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Shillong Lajong - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.60
Goals scored / match1.01.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match1.41.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+3+6
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
Aizawl - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.201.00
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match1.41.4
Average goals in match1.82.2
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet0%40%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-5-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Shillong Lajong
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
2
5
16-30
7
0
31-45
6
4
46-60
5
0
61-75
6
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

Aizawl
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
0
4
16-30
3
8
31-45
2
2
46-60
4
4
61-75
7
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.27
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.1 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
67%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+83%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
66%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Shillong Lajong

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.95
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.44
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.51
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
113%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
65%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.34
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Aizawl

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.53
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.60
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
114%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
132%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.28
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
39% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
39%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (I-League).

Teams vs league

Shillong LajongLigaAizawl
Average goals in match 2.793.03 3.75
Both teams scored 50%64% 83%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%56% 75%
Clean sheets 43%20% 0%
Goal before half-time 79%73% 92%
Goal after half-time 86%89% 92%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.03
Average goals per match
64%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.71
Home goals / match
1.32
Away goals / match
+30%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
89%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Shillong Lajong 1 - 1 - 0 Aizawl. Average goals 6.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Shillong Lajong FC
4 : 4
Aizawl FC
Aizawl FC
1 : 3
Shillong Lajong FC

FAQ

What was the result of Shillong Lajong vs Aizawl?

The I-League match finished Shillong Lajong 6:1 Aizawl. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Shillong Lajong and Aizawl?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Shillong Lajong won 1, Aizawl won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 6.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Shillong Lajong vs Aizawl?

Shillong Lajong score 1.93 goals per game on average and Aizawl 1.50. The I-League average is 3.03 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Shillong Lajong's matches and 83% of Aizawl's.

What form are Shillong Lajong and Aizawl in?

Over the last 5 games Shillong Lajong have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Aizawl 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Shillong Lajong vs Aizawl?

The statistical background for Shillong Lajong vs Aizawl — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.