Shillong Lajong vs Diamond Harbour: match statistics
Shillong Lajong displays solid home form with a record of 50% wins and 50% draws, having not lost a single match in front of their home crowd yet. The hosts possess an advantage in ball possession (58%) and decent efficiency (19% shot conversion), giving them attacking stability. Diamond Harbour is an enigma - the lack of any away match statistics this season (all values are 0) suggests the team hasn't played on the road yet or the data is incomplete. The overall form of both teams is similar (PPG 1.4 vs 1.2), however, the home advantage and the documented efficiency of Shillong Lajong work in their favor. Taking into account the hosts' home solidity and the lack of data regarding the visitors' away disposition, a Shillong Lajong victory is the most probable result, although a tight match ending in a draw cannot be ruled out.
Shillong Lajong vs Diamond Harbour: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Shillong Lajong played against Diamond Harbour in I-League (India). The game was played on March 14, 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Recent form
Shillong Lajong has 1 win, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Diamond Harbour has 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 1.50 points per game.
Scoring records
Shillong Lajong scores 1.50 goals per game and allows 1.00. Diamond Harbour scores 1.00 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.71 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 100% of Shillong Lajong's games and 50% of Diamond Harbour's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 50%, compared with league averages of 79% for BTTS and 57% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Shillong Lajong has the higher season xG average, 1.31 to 1.19 per game. Shillong Lajong takes 8.0 shots per game, while Diamond Harbour takes 7.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Shillong Lajong leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 0.50 goals per game after halftime. Diamond Harbour leads at halftime in 50% and scores 0.50 after halftime.
When the teams score
Shillong Lajong's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). For Diamond Harbour, it is minutes 31-45+ (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
I-League games average 2.71 goals. Both teams score in 79% of games, and 57% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Shillong Lajong displays solid home form with a record of 50% wins and 50% draws, having not lost a single match in front of their home crowd yet. The hosts possess an advantage in ball possession (58%) and decent efficiency (19% shot conversion), giving them attacking stability. Diamond Harbour is an enigma - the lack of any away match statistics this season (all values are 0) suggests the team hasn't played on the road yet or the data is incomplete. The overall form of both teams is similar (PPG 1.4 vs 1.2), however, the home advantage and the documented efficiency of Shillong Lajong work in their favor. Taking into account the hosts' home solidity and the lack of data regarding the visitors' away disposition, a Shillong Lajong victory is the most probable result, although a tight match ending in a draw cannot be ruled out.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Shillong Lajong | Diamond Harbour | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.16 | 0.16 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.50 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Shillong Lajong is 33% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Shillong Lajong · 1.5 pts / game - Diamond Harbour
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Shillong Lajong is 50% better for: goals scored per game.
1.5 goals / game - Shillong Lajong · 1 goals / game - Diamond Harbour
Shillong Lajong scores in 100% of games (2 of 2 meczów), while Diamond Harbour keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 meczów).
Diamond Harbour scores in 50% of games (1 of 2 meczów), while Shillong Lajong keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Shillong Lajong
Over / Under - Diamond Harbour
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Shillong Lajong - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Diamond Harbour - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 1.0 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.50 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.5 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Average goals per game | 1.5 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 50% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 50% | 50% |
| No goal | 0% | 50% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 0.50 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.5 | 1.5 |
| 1 goal | 50% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 50% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 0% |
| No goal | 50% | 50% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (1 goal). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Shillong Lajong
Diamond Harbour
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (I-League).
Teams vs league
| Shillong Lajong | Liga | Diamond Harbour | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.50 | 2.71 | ▼ 2.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 100% | 79% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 57% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 14% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 71% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 93% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Shillong Lajong vs Diamond Harbour?
The I-League match finished Shillong Lajong 1:2 Diamond Harbour. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Shillong Lajong vs Diamond Harbour?
Shillong Lajong score 1.50 goals per game on average and Diamond Harbour 1.00. The I-League average is 2.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Shillong Lajong's matches and 50% of Diamond Harbour's.
What form are Shillong Lajong and Diamond Harbour in?
Over the last 5 games Shillong Lajong have a 1-1-0 record (2.00 points per game) and Diamond Harbour 1-0-1 (1.50 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Shillong Lajong vs Diamond Harbour?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Shillong Lajong vs Diamond Harbour: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.