Shirak vs BKMA: match statistics
Shirak vs BKMA: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Shirak played against BKMA in Armenian Premier League (Armenia). The game was played on April 16, 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Shirak has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.20 points per game. BKMA has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses, with 0.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Shirak scores 0.68 goals per game and allows 1.79. BKMA scores 1.05 and allows 1.55. Games in this league average 2.53 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 37% of Shirak's games and 55% of BKMA's. The Over 2.5 rates are 47% and 55%, compared with league averages of 45% for BTTS and 48% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
BKMA has the higher season xG average, 1.28 to 0.96 per game. Shirak takes 8.0 shots per game, while BKMA takes 11.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Shirak leads at halftime in 16% of its games and scores 0.37 goals per game after halftime. BKMA leads at halftime in 25% and scores 0.60 after halftime.
When the teams score
Shirak's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (4 goals). For BKMA, it is minutes 61-75 (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Armenian Premier League games average 2.53 goals. Both teams score in 45% of games, and 48% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Both teams are clearly in crisis: in the last 5 matches each averaged only 0.2 points and both conceded 9 goals; Shirak failed to score in those five matches (0 goals), while BKMA scored only 1. BKMA has an advantage in chance creation — on average 10.56 shots and 4.33 on target per away game versus Shirak’s 8 shots and 3.22 on target at home, and a higher xG of 1.18 versus 0.98. This season BKMA have scored 21 goals compared to Shirak’s 13, confirming better offensive efficiency from the visitors despite poor form. However, Shirak defends better at home — conceding 1.33 goals per game and keeping 22% clean sheets, while BKMA concede 2.11 goals away and have 11% clean sheets; at the same time Shirak failed to score in 56% of home matches, and BKMA were goalless in 33% of away games. Considering the greater number of chances, higher xG (1.18 vs 0.98) and lower share of goalless matches for BKMA, I predict a narrow victory for the visitors.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal signals are mixed: BKMA has 67% of matches with both teams scoring vs Shirak's 45%, which seasonally favors BTTS on BKMA's side. However, in the last 5 matches Shirak hasn't scored a single goal (0.0) and has 0% BTTS in their last five, while BKMA averages 1.0 goals in the last 5 and 20% BTTS, which weakens the both-teams-to-score outlook now. Looking at xG and defense, Shirak has a season xG of 1.27 with xG against 1.48, but in the last 5 their xG for dropped to 0.81 with xG against 2.03, and BKMA seasonally has xG 1.18 and concedes 2.11 goals per match on average — so BKMA is likely to score while Shirak struggles to create. Considering Shirak's zero goals in their last 5, the lower recent xG of 0.81 and the seasonal BTTS disparity of 67%/45%, I assign a higher probability to “No” – 70% versus 30% “Yes.”
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I estimate expected goals at 1.53 for Shirak and 1.33 for BKMA (total 2.86), based on seasonal attacking xG 1.27 (Shirak) and 1.18 (BKMA) and xG conceded 1.48 (Shirak) and 1.78 (BKMA). Over 1.5 is the strongest signal: Shirak scored over 1.5 goals in 64% of matches this season, BKMA in 89%, so I assess the chance of Over 1.5 at 80%. Over 2.5 has moderate support — seasonally Shirak 45% and BKMA 67% — and the projected 2.86 goals translates to roughly a 62% probability for Over 2.5. Over 3.5 is much less likely (seasonally 27% and 44% and expected 2.86 < 3.5), hence only ~30% chance for Over 3.5. Additionally, in the last 5 matches Shirak scored 0 goals and BKMA 1 goal, while both teams conceded 9 goals in those 5 games, which sustains an edge for overs on the lower lines despite poor attacking form.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Half-time statistics clearly favor the visitors: Shirak led at the break in 18% of matches, the score was level at half-time in 36%, and the home side trailed at the break in 45%, with half-time goals averaging 0.18 for Shirak versus 0.78 for BKMA. In the second half Shirak more often stages a turnaround — the home team collected 15 points in second halves compared to 4 points for the visitors, and second-half wins are 27% for Shirak versus 11% for BKMA. BKMA defends poorly away (conceding 2.11 goals on average away with xG against 1.78) and concedes many goals after the break (6 goals in minutes 46–60), while Shirak scored 4 goals in 61–75 and 3 goals in 76–90, which favors an equalizer. Combining these facts (Shirak trailing at the break in a high 45% of matches, but with strong ability to score and earn points after half-time, and BKMA’s high tendency to concede) the most consistent scenario is visitors leading at half-time and a draw at full-time; therefore I recommend HT/FT 2/X (probability 21%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Shirak | BKMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.23 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
BKMA is 54% better for: goals scored per game.
0.68 goals / game - Shirak · 1.05 goals / game - BKMA
BKMA is 15% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.79 goals / game - Shirak · 1.55 goals / game - BKMA
Shirak scores in 42% of games (8 of 19 meczów), while BKMA keeps a clean sheet in 25% (5 of 20 meczów).
BKMA scores in 60% of games (12 of 20 meczów), while Shirak keeps a clean sheet in 21% (4 of 19 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Shirak
Over / Under - BKMA
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
BKMA is 24% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.89 pts / game - Shirak · 1.1 pts / game - BKMA
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Shirak - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 16% of games and wins 11%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
BKMA - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 15%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 100% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 100% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Shirak
BKMA
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Armenian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Shirak | Liga | BKMA | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.47 | 2.53 | • 2.60 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 37% | 45% | ▲ 55% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 47% | 48% | ▲ 55% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 21% | 32% | ▼ 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 63% | 70% | • 70% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 84% | 80% | • 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Shirak's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss against BKMA. Games average 1.50 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Shirak vs BKMA?
The Armenian Premier League match finished Shirak 1:1 BKMA. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Shirak and BKMA?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Shirak won 0, BKMA won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Shirak vs BKMA?
Shirak score 0.68 goals per game on average and BKMA 1.05. The Armenian Premier League average is 2.53 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 37% of Shirak's matches and 55% of BKMA's.
What form are Shirak and BKMA in?
Over the last 5 games Shirak have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and BKMA 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Shirak vs BKMA?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Shirak vs BKMA: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


