Shire Endaselassie vs Adama Kenema: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Shire Endaselassie play Adama Kenema in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match date is 30 December 2025 at 14:00. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Shire Endaselassie: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Adama Kenema: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Shire Endaselassie scores 0.65 and concedes 0.86 goals per match. Adama Kenema scores 0.92 and concedes 1.00. League average: 1.78 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Shire Endaselassie 27%, Adama Kenema 42%. Over 2.5: Shire Endaselassie 19%, Adama Kenema 32%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.

xG, shots and style

Adama Kenema has higher xG: 1.12 vs 0.95. Shire Endaselassie: 5.3 shots per match, Adama Kenema: 6.4.

Match halves

Shire Endaselassie: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.27. Adama Kenema: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.47.

Goals by minute

Shire Endaselassie: 0-15 (5 goals). Adama Kenema: 16-30 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ethiopia Premier League: 1.78 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 0%.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

54Possession (%)46
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema
5Shots8
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema
2Shots on target5
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema
0.68xG1.07
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema
2Corners3
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema
29Dangerous attacks29
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema
16Fouls11
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema
0Cards0
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema
0.65Goals scored / match0.92
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema
0.86Goals conceded / match1
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema
45%Average possession52%
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema
2.14Shots on target / match2.5
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

5.27Shots per match6.39
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema
2.14Shots on target2.5
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema
12.3%Shot conversion14.4%
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema
45%Possession52%
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema
0.95xG for1.12
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema
1.24xG against1.1
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema

Shooting quality

Shire Endaselassie: Counter-attackingAdama Kenema: Efficient finishing
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema
Accuracy (shots on target)41%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.180.18
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Adama Kenema is 40% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Shire Endaselassie · 1.4 pts / match - Adama Kenema

Shire Endaselassie
DDLWL
Season result split
24% W38% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-14-14
1.11 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-6-6
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LWWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.19Opponent xG: 1.24BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Adama Kenema
LWDLW
Season result split
26% W42% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-16-12
1.21 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-8-6
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DLLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.12Opponent xG: 0.80BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Adama Kenema is 42% better for: goals scored per match.

0.65 goals / match - Shire Endaselassie · 0.92 goals / match - Adama Kenema

Shire Endaselassie is 16% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.86 goals / match - Shire Endaselassie · 1 goals / match - Adama Kenema

Shire Endaselassie scoring profile: mixed

Shire Endaselassie scores in 46% of matches (17 of 37 matches), while Adama Kenema keeps a clean sheet in 42% (16 of 38 matches).

Adama Kenema scoring profile: mixed

Adama Kenema scores in 61% of matches (23 of 38 matches), while Shire Endaselassie keeps a clean sheet in 41% (15 of 37 matches).

24Goals scored (season)35
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema
32Goals conceded (season)38
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema
1.51Average goals in match1.92
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema
4Goals scored (last 5)5
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema
5Goals conceded (last 5)6
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema

How often they score at least...

46%1 goal61%
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema
14%2 goals18%
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema
5%3 goals11%
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema
0%4 goals3%
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema

How often they concede at least...

59%1 goal58%
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema
19%2 goals32%
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema
5%3 goals11%
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema
3%4 goals0%
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

27%
Shire Endaselassie - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.10 of 37 matches
40%
League average

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time16%
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema
0%BTTS in both halves3%
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema
11%Scored in both halves11%
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema

BTTS and goal count

14%Min. 3 goals and BTTS29%
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema
20%BTTS - last 540%
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

51%Min. 1 goal before half-time53%
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema
16%Min. 2 goals before half-time24%
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema

2nd half

51%Min. 1 goal after half-time61%
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema
24%Min. 2 goals after half-time29%
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema
3%Min. 3 goals after half-time8%
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Shire Endaselassie is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.27 pts / match - Shire Endaselassie · 1.21 pts / match - Adama Kenema

Shire Endaselassie - half-time state
24% leading54% draw22% trailing
Adama Kenema - half-time state
21% leading58% draw21% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.27Points per match (1st half)1.21
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema
0.38Goals scored (1st half)0.45
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema
0.35Goals conceded (1st half)0.45
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema
0.73Average goals (1st half)0.89
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema
70%Clean sheet before half-time63%
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema
68%No goal before half-time68%
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema

After half-time (2nd half)

1.05Points per match (2nd half)1.13
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema
0.27Goals scored (2nd half)0.47
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema
0.51Goals conceded (2nd half)0.55
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema
0.78Average goals (2nd half)1.03
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema
62%Clean sheet after half-time61%
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema
76%No goal after half-time61%
Shire EndaselassieAdama Kenema

Shire Endaselassie - second-half results

16% W57% R27% P
47
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.27
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Adama Kenema - second-half results

21% W50% R29% P
46
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
43
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.21
PPG before half-time
Lead holding124%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Shire Endaselassie - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Adama Kenema - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.60
Goals scored / match0.80.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match1.21.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+2-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Shire Endaselassie
ScoredConceded
5
2
0-15
5
2
16-30
4
9
31-45
5
5
46-60
1
5
61-75
4
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Adama Kenema
ScoredConceded
6
1
0-15
8
11
16-30
3
5
31-45
5
4
46-60
5
8
61-75
8
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (8 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.71
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
35%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+133%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
28%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
21%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Shire Endaselassie

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
71%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
99%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Adama Kenema

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
106%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
110%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.19
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).

Teams vs league

Shire EndaselassieLigaAdama Kenema
Average goals in match 1.511.78 1.92
Both teams scored 27%40% 42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 19%28% 32%
Clean sheets 41%40% 42%
Goal before half-time 51%56% 53%
Goal after half-time 51%59% 61%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.78
Average goals per match
40%
Both teams scored
28%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
40%
Clean sheets
0.91
Home goals / match
0.87
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Shire Endaselassie 0 - 0 - 1 Adama Kenema. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Shire Endaselassie vs Adama Kenema?

The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Shire Endaselassie 0:1 Adama Kenema. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Shire Endaselassie vs Adama Kenema?

Shire Endaselassie score 0.65 goals per game on average and Adama Kenema 0.92. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 27% of Shire Endaselassie's matches and 42% of Adama Kenema's.

What form are Shire Endaselassie and Adama Kenema in?

Over the last 5 games Shire Endaselassie have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Adama Kenema 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Shire Endaselassie vs Adama Kenema?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.