Shooting Stars vs Nasarawa United: match statistics
Shooting Stars vs Nasarawa United: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Shooting Stars played against Nasarawa United in NPFL (Nigeria). The game was played on May 3, 2026. Final score: 3:2.
Recent form
Shooting Stars has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Nasarawa United has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Shooting Stars scores 1.06 goals per game and allows 1.06. Nasarawa United scores 0.97 and allows 0.80. Games in this league average 1.96 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 40% of Shooting Stars's games and 34% of Nasarawa United's. The Over 2.5 rates are 34% and 29%, compared with league averages of 38% for BTTS and 32% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Nasarawa United has the higher season xG average, 1.67 to 1.32 per game. Shooting Stars takes 6.9 shots per game, while Nasarawa United takes 8.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Shooting Stars leads at halftime in 31% of its games and scores 0.54 goals per game after halftime. Nasarawa United leads at halftime in 26% and scores 0.46 after halftime.
When the teams score
Shooting Stars's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (12 goals). For Nasarawa United, it is minutes 31-45+ (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
NPFL games average 1.96 goals. Both teams score in 38% of games, and 32% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Shooting Stars are the favorites for this match: at home they have won 76% of games, a positive goal difference of +17 and average 1.71 goals scored and 0.71 conceded per match. In attack the hosts average 11.54 shots per game (3.77 on target), have xG 1.53 and a conversion rate of 14%, while Nasarawa away record 6.22 shots (1.89 on target), xG 0.96 and 7% conversion. Defensively Shooting Stars hold a clear advantage — at home they keep 41% clean sheets and only 12% of matches without scoring, whereas the visitors away manage just 18% clean sheets and as many as 65% of matches without scoring. In the last 5 matches the hosts are 2-1-2 with 5 goals (1.4 pts/match), and Nasarawa 2-0-3 with 7 goals (1.2 pts/match), which indicates greater instability from the away side (averaging 0.47 goals/match). Considering the superiority in shots, higher xG for the hosts and Nasarawa’s offensive weakness away, I tip a Shooting Stars win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Shooting Stars as hosts average 1.44 goals scored and concede only 0.5 goals per match this season; they also have a high xG of 2.07 and 6.5 shots on target per game, indicating superiority in chance creation. Nasarawa United score only 0.47 goals per game this season, have xG 0.96, just 1.89 shots on target and a conversion rate of 7%, so their actual chances of scoring are low. Shooting Stars kept a clean sheet in 50% of matches (Nasarawa 18%), and season BTTS rates are 39% for the home side and 29% for the away side versus the league 38%, showing that fixtures between these teams less frequently end Goal/Goal. Although Nasarawa have scored 7 goals in their last 5 matches (1.4 average), given the disparity in xG and shots (2.07/6.5 vs 0.96/1.89) and the season 0.47 away goal rate, I estimate a 75% probability for No Goal (clean sheet expected for one side) and 25% for BTTS - Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG analysis shows 2.07 xG for Shooting Stars’ attack vs 1.62 xG for Nasarawa’s defense, yielding an expected 1.85 goals for the home side; similarly 0.96 xG for Nasarawa’s attack vs 1.23 for the home defense yields 1.09 expected goals for the away side, totaling 2.94 expected goals. Additionally, the hosts average 15.19 shots and 6.5 on target per match, while the visitors only 6.22 and 1.89, with conversion rates of 10% vs 7%, confirming Shooting Stars’ offensive superiority. Season-wide Over 2.5 occurred in 33% of home matches and 24% of away matches, but in the last 5 meetings both teams show a 40% Over 2.5 rate; note also that the hosts have 50% clean sheets, which reduces certainty. Based on this I estimate probabilities: Over 1.5 ≈79%, Over 2.5 ≈56% and Over 3.5 ≈34%; the strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5, and as a value play I recommend Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Shooting Stars have a clear advantage: they average 1.44 goals per match versus Nasarawa’s 0.47 and have xG of 2.07 compared to the visitors’ 0.96, while also registering 6.5 shots on target against opponents’ 1.89. At Half-Time the hosts lead in 44% of matches (8 times), scoring an average of 0.83 goals and conceding only 0.28, whereas Nasarawa scores 0.18 goals by Half-Time and leads at the break in just 6% of games (once). After Half-Time Shooting Stars are stronger as well — they score on average 0.61 goals and concede 0.22, while the visitors score 0.29 and concede 0.53, which reduces the likelihood of a turnaround. Additionally, the hosts have won 67% of home matches versus just 18% for Nasarawa, and 72% of the hosts’ halves are clean sheets, making it harder for the opponents to score before the break; therefore the 1/1 scenario receives the highest weight (48%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Shooting Stars | Nasarawa United | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 29% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.19 | 0.20 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.54 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Shooting Stars is 17% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Shooting Stars · 1.2 pts / game - Nasarawa United
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Shooting Stars is 9% better for: goals scored per game.
1.06 goals / game - Shooting Stars · 0.97 goals / game - Nasarawa United
Nasarawa United is 32% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.06 goals / game - Shooting Stars · 0.8 goals / game - Nasarawa United
Shooting Stars scores in 60% of games (21 of 35 meczów), while Nasarawa United keeps a clean sheet in 34% (12 of 35 meczów).
Nasarawa United scores in 60% of games (21 of 35 meczów), while Shooting Stars keeps a clean sheet in 26% (9 of 35 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Shooting Stars
Over / Under - Nasarawa United
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Shooting Stars - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 31% of games and wins 46%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Nasarawa United - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 26% of games and wins 43%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Shooting Stars
Nasarawa United
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NPFL).
Teams vs league
| Shooting Stars | Liga | Nasarawa United | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.11 | 1.96 | ▼ 1.77 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 40% | 38% | ▼ 34% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 34% | 32% | ▼ 29% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 26% | 37% | ▼ 34% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 71% | 60% | ▲ 63% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 66% | 63% | • 63% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Record from Shooting Stars's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Nasarawa United. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Shooting Stars vs Nasarawa United?
The NPFL match finished Shooting Stars 3:2 Nasarawa United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Shooting Stars vs Nasarawa United?
Shooting Stars score 1.06 goals per game on average and Nasarawa United 0.97. The NPFL average is 1.96 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 32% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Shooting Stars's matches and 34% of Nasarawa United's.
What form are Shooting Stars and Nasarawa United in?
Over the last 5 games Shooting Stars have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Nasarawa United 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Shooting Stars vs Nasarawa United?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Shooting Stars vs Nasarawa United: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


