Shrewsbury Town vs Gillingham: match statistics
Shrewsbury Town vs Gillingham: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Shrewsbury Town played against Gillingham in EFL League Two (England). The game was played on November 29, 2025. Final score: 3:3.
Recent form
Shrewsbury Town has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Gillingham has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Shrewsbury Town scores 0.88 goals per game and allows 1.65. Gillingham scores 1.35 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.64 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 47% of Shrewsbury Town's games and 59% of Gillingham's. The Over 2.5 rates are 53% and 35%, compared with league averages of 56% for BTTS and 49% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Gillingham has the higher season xG average, 1.46 to 1.27 per game. Shrewsbury Town takes 11.8 shots per game, while Gillingham takes 12.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Shrewsbury Town leads at halftime in 12% of its games and scores 0.47 goals per game after halftime. Gillingham leads at halftime in 18% and scores 0.94 after halftime.
When the teams score
Shrewsbury Town's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). For Gillingham, it is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
League Two games average 2.64 goals. Both teams score in 56% of games, and 49% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Shrewsbury Town | Gillingham | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 26% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Shrewsbury Town is 40% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Shrewsbury Town · 1 pts / game - Gillingham
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Gillingham is 53% better for: goals scored per game.
0.88 goals / game - Shrewsbury Town · 1.35 goals / game - Gillingham
Gillingham is 65% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.65 goals / game - Shrewsbury Town · 1 goals / game - Gillingham
Shrewsbury Town scores in 65% of games (11 of 17 meczów), while Gillingham keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 meczów).
Gillingham scores in 88% of games (15 of 17 meczów), while Shrewsbury Town keeps a clean sheet in 35% (6 of 17 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Shrewsbury Town
Over / Under - Gillingham
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Gillingham is 27% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.88 pts / game - Shrewsbury Town · 1.12 pts / game - Gillingham
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Shrewsbury Town - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 12% of games and wins 24%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Gillingham - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 18% of games and wins 41%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Shrewsbury Town
Gillingham
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League Two).
Teams vs league
| Shrewsbury Town | Liga | Gillingham | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.53 | 2.64 | ▼ 2.35 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 47% | 56% | ▲ 59% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 53% | 49% | ▼ 35% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 35% | 25% | ▲ 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 53% | 71% | ▼ 47% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 71% | 75% | • 76% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Shrewsbury Town vs Gillingham?
The EFL League Two match finished Shrewsbury Town 3:3 Gillingham. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Shrewsbury Town vs Gillingham?
Shrewsbury Town score 0.88 goals per game on average and Gillingham 1.35. The EFL League Two average is 2.64 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Shrewsbury Town's matches and 59% of Gillingham's.
What form are Shrewsbury Town and Gillingham in?
Over the last 5 games Shrewsbury Town have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Gillingham 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Shrewsbury Town vs Gillingham?
The statistical background for Shrewsbury Town vs Gillingham — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.