Silkeborg vs Viborg: match statistics
Silkeborg vs Viborg: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Silkeborg played against Viborg in Superliga (Denmark). The game was played on September 13, 2026. Venue: JYSK park. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Silkeborg has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Viborg has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Silkeborg scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 1.57. Viborg scores 1.43 and allows 0.86. Games in this league average 2.88 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 71% of Silkeborg's games and 29% of Viborg's. The Over 2.5 rates are 43% and 43%, compared with league averages of 56% for BTTS and 53% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Viborg has the higher season xG average, 1.43 to 1.25 per game. Silkeborg takes 11.1 shots per game, while Viborg takes 13.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Silkeborg leads at halftime in 43% of its games and scores 0.14 goals per game after halftime. Viborg leads at halftime in 29% and scores 0.57 after halftime.
When the teams score
Silkeborg's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (3 goals). For Viborg, it is minutes 0-15 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Superliga games average 2.88 goals. Both teams score in 56% of games, and 53% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Viborg sit 4th, while Silkeborg are ninth, and the gap is reflected in their current form: the visitors have won 3 of their last 5 matches and scored 9 goals in the process, whereas the hosts have failed to win any, recording 2 draws and 3 defeats with just 4 goals scored. Silkeborg have conceded an average of 2 goals per match recently, letting in 10 across five appearances, giving Viborg a clear opportunity to exploit their superior attacking form. The visitors also have the stronger defensive record over the season, conceding an average of 1 goal per match compared with 1.33 for the hosts. Chance-creation statistics slightly favor Viborg: away from home, they average an xG of 1.54 and 14.33 shots, while Silkeborg have an xG of 1.42 and 13 attempts at home. Silkeborg’s home advantage reduces confidence in the pick, as both teams have a 33% win, draw and loss rate in these conditions; however, the current trend favors the visitors.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS pick is not primarily based on Silkeborg’s low scoring efficiency: the hosts have averaged just 0.8 goals over their last 5 matches, while across the season they have failed to score in 25% of games. The season-long BTTS rates for both teams are notably low, standing at 25% for Silkeborg and 33% for Viborg, compared with 56% across the league. Silkeborg have kept a clean sheet in 50% of their matches, while Viborg have failed to score in as many as 67% of their games, creating two credible scenarios in which one team does not score. Although Viborg’s recent form is strong, with an average of 1.8 goals scored and an xG of 1.53, their opponents have conceded 2.0 goals recently. Therefore, the most likely outcome remains a clean-sheet away win rather than a Goal/Goal result. BTTS - No means that at least one team fails to score; it does not automatically imply a 0:0 draw or that neither team will score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Silkeborg scored just 0.8 goals per game across their last five matches, while conceding as many as 2.0 per match, which clearly opens the door for Viborg to find the net. The visitors are in better attacking form: they have averaged 1.8 goals recently, with their xG standing at 1.53 compared to Silkeborg’s 1.08. Both teams recorded Over 2.5 goals in 60% of their last five matches, although caution with higher lines is warranted, as 75% of Silkeborg’s and 67% of Viborg’s matches this season ended with Under 3.5 goals. The Over 1.5 goals line has the strongest support, as the projected total of 2.75 goals and the hosts’ poor recent defensive record clearly increase the likelihood of at least two goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely HT/FT outcome is a draw at half-time followed by a Viborg win, as the visitors have averaged 1.8 goals and won 60% of their last five matches, while Silkeborg have failed to win any and conceded an average of 2.0 goals. The half-time draw is supported by the fact that Viborg were level after 45 minutes in 67% of their away matches and have not conceded a single away goal before the break this season. The second half is the decisive factor, however: Silkeborg have scored no goals after the break in their last five matches and conceded an average of 1.8, whereas Viborg have averaged 0.6 goals scored and 0.6 conceded in the same phase. The hosts’ historical home results are stronger, with wins in 75% of their matches, but the visitors’ current form and Silkeborg’s clear second-half decline point more strongly towards the X/2 scenario.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Silkeborg | Viborg | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Viborg is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - Silkeborg · 2 pts / game - Viborg
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Viborg is 43% better for: goals scored per game.
1 goals / game - Silkeborg · 1.43 goals / game - Viborg
Viborg is 83% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.57 goals / game - Silkeborg · 0.86 goals / game - Viborg
Silkeborg scores in 86% of games (6 of 7 meczów), while Viborg keeps a clean sheet in 43% (3 of 7 meczów).
Viborg scores in 57% of games (4 of 7 meczów), while Silkeborg keeps a clean sheet in 14% (1 of 7 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Silkeborg
Over / Under - Viborg
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Silkeborg is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.71 pts / game - Silkeborg · 1.43 pts / game - Viborg
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Silkeborg - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 43% of games and wins 14%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.7 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Viborg - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 57%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +4 | -6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Silkeborg
Viborg
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Superliga).
Teams vs league
| Silkeborg | Liga | Viborg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.57 | 2.88 | ▼ 2.29 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 71% | 56% | ▼ 29% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 43% | 53% | ▼ 43% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 14% | 23% | ▲ 43% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 71% | 74% | ▼ 57% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 86% | 88% | ▼ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Silkeborg's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss against Viborg. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Silkeborg vs Viborg?
The Superliga match finished Silkeborg 1:1 Viborg. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Silkeborg and Viborg?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Silkeborg won 1, Viborg won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Silkeborg vs Viborg?
Silkeborg score 1.00 goals per game on average and Viborg 1.43. The Superliga average is 2.88 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 71% of Silkeborg's matches and 29% of Viborg's.
What form are Silkeborg and Viborg in?
Over the last 5 games Silkeborg have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Viborg 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Silkeborg vs Viborg?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


