Simba vs JKT Tanzania: match statistics
Simba vs JKT Tanzania: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Simba play JKT Tanzania in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match date is 6 May 2026 at 17:15. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Simba: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match. JKT Tanzania: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Simba scores 1.79 and concedes 0.38 goals per match. JKT Tanzania scores 1.00 and concedes 1.10. League average: 2.17 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Simba 28%, JKT Tanzania 43%. Over 2.5: Simba 48%, JKT Tanzania 40%. League level: BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.
xG, shots and style
Simba has higher xG: 1.57 vs 1.18. Simba: 8.7 shots per match, JKT Tanzania: 6.5.
Match halves
Simba: half-time lead 59%, second-half goals 0.79. JKT Tanzania: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.63.
Goals by minute
Simba: 31-45+ (13 goals). JKT Tanzania: 76-90+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ligi kuu Bara: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Match description
Simba is the favorite in this matchup: they sit 2nd in the table, win 67% of home games and average 2.11 goals while conceding only 0.56 per match. In home fixtures their xG is 1.73 versus opponents’ xG of 0.86, they average 4.75 shots on target per game with an 18% conversion rate, which translates into 67% clean sheets. JKT Tanzania are 5th, on the road they score 1.1 and concede 1.4 on average, have an xG of 1.21 against an xG conceded of 1.3 and have shipped 11 goals in the last 5 matches compared to Simba’s 3. The visitors register only 3 shots on target per away game, a 12% conversion and 30% of away matches without scoring, which limits their ability to recover deficits on the road. Considering the higher home xG (1.73 vs 1.21), superior efficiency (2.11 vs 1.1 goals per game) and Simba’s defensive edge (0.56 conceded vs 1.4), I forecast a home win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Simba | JKT Tanzania | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 42% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.18 | 0.18 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.51 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Simba is 275% better for: last-5 form.
3 pts / match - Simba · 0.8 pts / match - JKT Tanzania
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Simba is 79% better for: goals scored per match.
1.79 goals / match - Simba · 1 goals / match - JKT Tanzania
Simba is 189% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.38 goals / match - Simba · 1.1 goals / match - JKT Tanzania
Simba scores in 83% of matches (24 of 29 matches), while JKT Tanzania keeps a clean sheet in 37% (11 of 30 matches).
JKT Tanzania scores in 70% of matches (21 of 30 matches), while Simba keeps a clean sheet in 69% (20 of 29 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Simba
Over / Under — JKT Tanzania
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Simba is 124% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.17 pts / match - Simba · 0.97 pts / match - JKT Tanzania
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Simba - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 59% of matches and wins 72%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
JKT Tanzania - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 100% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (13 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Simba
JKT Tanzania
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).
Teams vs league
| Simba | Liga | JKT Tanzania | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.17 | 2.17 | • 2.10 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 28% | 35% | ▲ 43% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 48% | 39% | • 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 69% | 39% | ▼ 37% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 69% | 60% | ▼ 57% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 69% | 63% | ▲ 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Simba 1 - 0 - 0 JKT Tanzania. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Simba vs JKT Tanzania?
The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Simba 1:0 JKT Tanzania. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Simba vs JKT Tanzania?
Simba score 1.79 goals per game on average and JKT Tanzania 1.00. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 28% of Simba's matches and 43% of JKT Tanzania's.
What form are Simba and JKT Tanzania in?
Over the last 5 games Simba have a 5-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and JKT Tanzania 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Simba vs JKT Tanzania?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Simba vs JKT Tanzania: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


