Simba vs JKT Tanzania: match statistics
Simba vs JKT Tanzania: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Simba played against JKT Tanzania in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The game was played on May 6, 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
Simba has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. JKT Tanzania has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Simba scores 1.68 goals per game and allows 0.47. JKT Tanzania scores 1.05 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.02 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 32% of Simba's games and 40% of JKT Tanzania's. The Over 2.5 rates are 47% and 35%, compared with league averages of 34% for BTTS and 36% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Simba has the higher season xG average, 1.57 to 1.23 per game. Simba takes 8.2 shots per game, while JKT Tanzania takes 7.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Simba leads at halftime in 58% of its games and scores 0.68 goals per game after halftime. JKT Tanzania leads at halftime in 15% and scores 0.70 after halftime.
When the teams score
Simba's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (7 goals). For JKT Tanzania, it is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ligi kuu Bara games average 2.02 goals. Both teams score in 34% of games, and 36% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Simba is the favorite in this matchup: they sit 2nd in the table, win 67% of home games and average 2.11 goals while conceding only 0.56 per match. In home fixtures their xG is 1.73 versus opponents’ xG of 0.86, they average 4.75 shots on target per game with an 18% conversion rate, which translates into 67% clean sheets. JKT Tanzania are 5th, on the road they score 1.1 and concede 1.4 on average, have an xG of 1.21 against an xG conceded of 1.3 and have shipped 11 goals in the last 5 matches compared to Simba’s 3. The visitors register only 3 shots on target per away game, a 12% conversion and 30% of away matches without scoring, which limits their ability to recover deficits on the road. Considering the higher home xG (1.73 vs 1.21), superior efficiency (2.11 vs 1.1 goals per game) and Simba’s defensive edge (0.56 conceded vs 1.4), I forecast a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have a seasonal BTTS rate of 40% (Simba 40%, JKT Tanzania 40%), while the league average BTTS is only 33% and 83% of league matches end with a clean sheet for one side. Simba has a strong defense: they concede 0.6 goals per game season-to-date and record clean sheets in 50% of matches; in the last 5 games they scored an average of 1.6 goals (8 goals) and conceded 0.6 goals (3 goals). JKT shows clear offensive and defensive issues: seasonally they score 1.1 goals and concede 1.4 goals, but in the last 5 matches they averaged only 0.8 goals (4 goals) and conceded 2.2 goals (11 goals). Despite similar attacking xG (xG 1.24 for Simba vs 1.21 for JKT), xG against highlights JKT’s weaker defense (1.3 vs 0.94), increasing the likelihood that Simba will score and the visitors will not respond. Based on these figures I assess the probability of BTTS - No at 65% versus 35% for BTTS - Yes, as the higher probability is driven by the hosts’ strong defense and JKT’s poor finishing in recent games.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG: Simba has xG_for 1.24 and the opponent xG_against 1.30, yielding an estimated 1.27 expected goals for the home side; JKT has xG_for 1.21 vs the home side’s xG_against 0.94, giving ~1.08 for the away team, totaling 2.35 goals. With a mean of 2.35 the Poisson distribution implies roughly a 68% probability of Over 1.5 goals, 42% for Over 2.5 and only 21% for Over 3.5. Additionally, seasonal figures show Simba scored 32 and conceded 9 goals (clean sheets 50%), while JKT has 21 scored and 20 conceded (conceded 11 in the last 5), which limits the likelihood of a very high goal count. Season-long Over 2.5 is 20% for Simba and 50% for JKT (35% average), and the last 5 matches for both teams show 60% Over 2.5, so risk is elevated, but the expected total of 2.35 and the low 21% chance of >3.5 support taking Under 3.5. Therefore I recommend the under side on the 3.5 line as the strongest signal (approx. 79% chance of fewer than 4 goals).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
According to the analysis I predict the 1/1 variant (home team leading at half-time and winning at full-time), which I assign the highest probability of 40%. The main arguments are first-half statistics: Simba led at the break in 3 of the last 5 matches (60% in the last 5) and seasonally in 30% of fixtures, with an average of 0.4 goals at half-time for the home side versus 0.11 for JKT. In the second half JKT shows greater offensive activity – scoring an average of 0.89 goals after the break versus 0.6 for Simba, and JKT’s matches average 2.0 goals in the second half – therefore I also account for the risk of an equalizer (1/X 8%) or a full-time draw (X/X 12%). Additionally, in the last 5 matches Simba scores on average 1.6 goals and concedes 0.6, while JKT has 0.8 scored and 2.2 conceded, and xG is 1.24 versus 1.21, which confirms Simba’s advantage and justifies choosing 1/1 as the strongest signal.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Simba | JKT Tanzania | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.19 | 0.16 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.49 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Simba is 80% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / game - Simba · 1 pts / game - JKT Tanzania
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Simba is 60% better for: goals scored per game.
1.68 goals / game - Simba · 1.05 goals / game - JKT Tanzania
Simba is 113% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.47 goals / game - Simba · 1 goals / game - JKT Tanzania
Simba scores in 74% of games (14 of 19 games), while JKT Tanzania keeps a clean sheet in 45% (9 of 20 games).
JKT Tanzania scores in 75% of games (15 of 20 games), while Simba keeps a clean sheet in 63% (12 of 19 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Simba
Over / Under - JKT Tanzania
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Simba is 106% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.16 pts / game - Simba · 1.05 pts / game - JKT Tanzania
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Simba - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 58% of games and wins 58%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
JKT Tanzania - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 15% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -6 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Simba
JKT Tanzania
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).
Teams vs league
| Simba | Liga | JKT Tanzania | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.16 | 2.02 | • 2.05 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 32% | 34% | ▲ 40% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 47% | 36% | • 35% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 63% | 41% | ▲ 45% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 68% | 55% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 63% | 60% | ▲ 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Simba's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against JKT Tanzania. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Simba vs JKT Tanzania?
The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Simba 1:0 JKT Tanzania. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Simba vs JKT Tanzania?
Simba score 1.68 goals per game on average and JKT Tanzania 1.05. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.02 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 36% of games. Both teams score in 32% of Simba's matches and 40% of JKT Tanzania's.
What form are Simba and JKT Tanzania in?
Over the last 5 games Simba have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and JKT Tanzania 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Simba vs JKT Tanzania?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Simba vs JKT Tanzania: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


