Tanzania - Ligi kuu BaraData current as of September 07, 2026

Simba vs Mtibwa Sugar: match statistics

Simba crest
Simba
1 : 1half-time 1:0
Mtibwa Sugar crest
Mtibwa Sugar
165%(1.18)
X25%(5.40)
210%(14.00)

Simba presents impressive home form with a 75% win rate and only 25% losses at their own stadium, averaging 2.25 goals with a 20% conversion rate. The hosts hold a significant advantage in possession (58% vs 45%) and a clearly better xG balance (1.82 vs 0.94), evidencing their offensive dominance. Mtibwa Sugar has not won a single away match this season (0% wins), failing to score in 100% of matches on the road, which is an alarming sign. The difference in quality is obvious—Simba has a +7 goal difference at home, whereas the visitors are -3 on their travels. Given all statistics, a decisive victory for the hosts is the most probable scenario for this match.

Simba vs Mtibwa Sugar: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Simba played against Mtibwa Sugar in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The game was played on January 18, 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Recent form

Simba has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.40 points per game. Mtibwa Sugar has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss, with 1.20 points per game.

Scoring records

Simba scores 2.20 goals per game and allows 0.60. Mtibwa Sugar scores 0.50 and allows 0.50. Games in this league average 1.69 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 20% of Simba's games and 13% of Mtibwa Sugar's. The Over 2.5 rates are 80% and 13%, compared with league averages of 25% for BTTS and 25% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Simba has the higher season xG average, 1.52 to 0.99 per game. Simba takes 6.2 shots per game, while Mtibwa Sugar takes 3.5.

First-half and second-half trends

Simba leads at halftime in 60% of its games and scores 1.20 goals per game after halftime. Mtibwa Sugar leads at halftime in 0% and scores 0.13 after halftime.

When the teams score

Simba's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (3 goals). For Mtibwa Sugar, it is minutes 0-15 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Ligi kuu Bara games average 1.69 goals. Both teams score in 25% of games, and 25% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Simba presents impressive home form with a 75% win rate and only 25% losses at their own stadium, averaging 2.25 goals with a 20% conversion rate. The hosts hold a significant advantage in possession (58% vs 45%) and a clearly better xG balance (1.82 vs 0.94), evidencing their offensive dominance. Mtibwa Sugar has not won a single away match this season (0% wins), failing to score in 100% of matches on the road, which is an alarming sign. The difference in quality is obvious—Simba has a +7 goal difference at home, whereas the visitors are -3 on their travels. Given all statistics, a decisive victory for the hosts is the most probable scenario for this match.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

57Possession (%)43
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
20Shots7
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
6Shots on target4
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
2.56xG1.02
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
9Corners2
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
122Dangerous attacks39
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
11Fouls12
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
0Cards0
SimbaMtibwa Sugar

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

2.2Goals scored / game0.5
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
0.6Goals allowed / game0.5
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
47%Average possession36%
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
3Shots on target / game1.63
SimbaMtibwa Sugar

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

6.2Shots per game3.5
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
3Shots on target1.63
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
35.5%Shot conversion14.3%
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
47%Possession36%
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
1.52xG for0.99
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
0.66xG against1.36
SimbaMtibwa Sugar

Shooting quality

Simba: Counter-attackingMtibwa Sugar: Counter-attacking
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
Accuracy (shots on target)48%47%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.250.28
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.730.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Simba is 100% better for: last-5 form.

2.4 pts / game - Simba · 1.2 pts / game - Mtibwa Sugar

Simba
WWWWL
Season result split
80% W0% R20% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / game · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-0-1
Last 5 at home
3-0-1
WWWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.52Opponent xG: 0.66BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 80%
Mtibwa Sugar
DLDWD
Season result split
25% W50% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-4-2
1.25 pts / game · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-3-2
Last 5 away
0-3-2
LDLDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 0.88Opponent xG: 1.40BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Simba is 340% better for: goals scored per game.

2.2 goals / game - Simba · 0.5 goals / game - Mtibwa Sugar

Mtibwa Sugar is 20% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.6 goals / game - Simba · 0.5 goals / game - Mtibwa Sugar

Simba scoring profile: mixed

Simba scores in 80% of games (4 of 5 meczów), while Mtibwa Sugar keeps a clean sheet in 63% (5 of 8 meczów).

Mtibwa Sugar scoring profile: more difficult

Mtibwa Sugar scores in 25% of games (2 of 8 meczów), while Simba keeps a clean sheet in 60% (3 of 5 meczów).

11Goals scored (season)4
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
3Goals conceded (season)4
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
2.8Average goals per game1
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
11Goals scored (last 5)2
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
3Goals conceded (last 5)3
SimbaMtibwa Sugar

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal25%
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
80%2 goals25%
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
60%3 goals0%
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
0%4 goals0%
SimbaMtibwa Sugar

How often they concede at least...

40%1 goal38%
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
20%2 goals13%
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
0%3 goals0%
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
0%4 goals0%
SimbaMtibwa Sugar

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time13%
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
0%BTTS in both halves0%
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
60%Scored in both halves13%
SimbaMtibwa Sugar

BTTS and goal count

20%Min. 3 goals and BTTS13%
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
60%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
20%BTTS - last 520%
SimbaMtibwa Sugar

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time38%
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time13%
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
SimbaMtibwa Sugar

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time25%
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
SimbaMtibwa Sugar

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Simba is 193% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.2 pts / game - Simba · 0.75 pts / game - Mtibwa Sugar

Simba - half-time state
60% leading40% draw0% trailing
Mtibwa Sugar - half-time state
0% leading75% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.2Points per game (1st half)0.75
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
1Goals scored (1st half)0.13
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
0Goals conceded (1st half)0.38
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
1Average goals (1st half)0.5
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
100%Clean sheet before half-time63%
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
40%No goal before half-time88%
SimbaMtibwa Sugar

After half-time (2nd half)

2.4Points per game (2nd half)1.13
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
1.2Goals scored (2nd half)0.13
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
0.6Goals conceded (2nd half)0.13
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
1.8Average goals (2nd half)0.25
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
60%Clean sheet after half-time88%
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
20%No goal after half-time88%
SimbaMtibwa Sugar

Simba - second-half results

80% W0% R20% P
11
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at halftime in 60% of games and wins 80%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.6

Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Mtibwa Sugar - second-half results

13% W75% R13% P
6
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.75
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime-0.3

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Simba - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.202.40
Goals scored / game1.01.2
Goals allowed / game0.00.6
Average goals per game1.01.8
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+5+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5
Mtibwa Sugar - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.801.20
Goals scored / game0.20.2
Goals allowed / game0.40.2
Average goals per game0.60.4
1 goal40%40%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Simba
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
3
0
31-45
1
1
46-60
2
0
61-75
3
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Mtibwa Sugar
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
2
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

1.90
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 0.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
112%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
17%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
20%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
15%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Simba

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.86
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.74
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.68
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
204%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
98%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Mtibwa Sugar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.37
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.37
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.49
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.86
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
46%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.05
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 50% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).

Teams vs league

SimbaLigaMtibwa Sugar
Average goals per game 2.801.69 1.00
Both teams scored 20%25% 13%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 80%25% 13%
Clean sheets 60%46% 63%
Goal before half-time 60%41% 38%
Goal after half-time 100%52% 25%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.69
Average goals per game
25%
Both teams scored
25%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
46%
Clean sheets
1.08
Home goals / game
0.61
Away goals / game
+77%
Home attack advantage
+44%
Home defensive advantage
+27%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
41%
1 goal
16%
2 goals
2%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
52%
1 goal
17%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Elie Mpanzu Kibisawala⚽ 1
Shomari Salum KapombeA 1

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. SimbaGoalElie Mpanzu KibisawalaAssist: Shomari Salum Kapombe

FAQ

What was the result of Simba vs Mtibwa Sugar?

The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Simba 1:1 Mtibwa Sugar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Simba vs Mtibwa Sugar?

Simba score 2.20 goals per game on average and Mtibwa Sugar 0.50. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 1.69 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 25% of games. Both teams score in 20% of Simba's matches and 13% of Mtibwa Sugar's.

What form are Simba and Mtibwa Sugar in?

Over the last 5 games Simba have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Mtibwa Sugar 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Simba vs Mtibwa Sugar?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.