Simba vs Singida Black Stars: match statistics
Simba vs Singida Black Stars: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Simba played against Singida Black Stars in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The game was played on June 27, 2026. Venue: Benjamin Mkapa National Stadium. Final score: 2:0.
Recent form
Simba has 5 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 3.00 points per game. Singida Black Stars has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Simba scores 1.81 goals per game and allows 0.41. Singida Black Stars scores 1.36 and allows 1.03. Games in this league average 2.17 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 30% of Simba's games and 42% of Singida Black Stars's. The Over 2.5 rates are 52% and 42%, compared with league averages of 35% for BTTS and 39% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Simba has the higher season xG average, 1.64 to 1.46 per game. Simba takes 9.0 shots per game, while Singida Black Stars takes 6.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Simba leads at halftime in 59% of its games and scores 0.78 goals per game after halftime. Singida Black Stars leads at halftime in 27% and scores 0.67 after halftime.
When the teams score
Simba's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (12 goals). For Singida Black Stars, it is minutes 0-15 (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ligi kuu Bara games average 2.17 goals. Both teams score in 35% of games, and 39% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Simba shows very strong home metrics: 77% home win rate, averaging 2.08 goals scored and only 0.46 conceded per match, with average xG 1.71 and xG against 0.78. Singida win just 29% of away matches, score 1.00 goal and concede 1.29 per game on average, and have a 41% rate of matches without scoring away. In the last 5 matches Singida scored 14 goals (2.8 per game) and won 4 times, while Simba have 5 wins in their last 5 (9 goals and only 2 conceded), indicating greater stability from the home side. The difference in chance creation is significant: Simba average 11.17 shots with 4.67 on target and 59% possession, versus 7 shots with 2.67 on target and 49% possession for Singida, translating into higher xG for the hosts (1.71 vs 1.19). Considering Simba’s 69% home clean sheet rate, superior defense (0.46 vs 1.29 conceded) and advantages in key metrics, I assess the probability of a home win at 70%, a draw at 18% and an away win at 12%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The forecast leans toward BTTS – No, because Simba keeps a clean sheet in 56% of matches while Singida fail to score in 41% of their games. Simba average 1.75 goals at home with xG 1.71, conceding only 0.75 goals per match (xG against 1.14); in the last 5 matches Simba have conceded a total of 2 goals (0.4 per match). Singida have a season scoring average of 1.0 and average 2.67 shots on target versus Simba’s 5.25, although in the short term they have scored 14 goals in 5 matches (2.8 average). Season BTTS rates are 31% for Simba and 53% for Singida, against a league level of 35%, which together suggests Simba is more likely to keep a clean sheet than both teams to score. Based on this I assess the probability of BTTS 'Yes' at around 30% and 'No' at around 70%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-based model gives 1.53 expected goals for Simba and 1.17 for Singida, totaling 2.70, which indicates a tendency toward at least 2 goals in the match. Simba scores 1.75 and concedes 0.75 at home with 11.5 shots and 5.25 shots on target, while Singida away records 1.00 goals scored and concedes 1.29 with 7.0 shots and 2.67 on target — the home side’s creative advantage favors goals. In the last 5 matches Simba scored 9 goals (1.8 per game) and Singida 14 (2.8 per game), and recent xG are 1.87 for Simba and 1.50 for Singida, which elevates the probability of over 2 goals. Seasonal percentages show over 1.5 goals in 56% of Simba’s matches and 82% of Singida’s, while over 2.5 sits seasonally at 50% for Simba and 35% for Singida (although in the last 5 it was 60% and 100%). Therefore I recommend an over 1.5 bet as the strongest signal (line 1.5), rate over 2.5 as moderately likely, and over 3.5 as unlikely.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Simba led at the break in 45% of home matches and averages 1.00 goals in the first half while conceding only 0.36, giving the hosts a clear advantage in the opening phase. Over the full 90 minutes Simba wins at home in 75% of cases, scoring 1.75 goals per season compared to Singida’s 1.00; additionally Simba’s xG is 1.71 versus the visitors’ 1.19, and shots on target are 5.25 versus 2.67, which confirms the hosts’ dominance. Simba keep a clean sheet at half-time in 73% of home games, while Singida led at the break in only 33% of their matches and average 0.58 first-half goals, so the scenario of Simba leading after 45 minutes is statistically justified. Although Singida’s last 5 matches show a form of 'lwwww' and they averaged 1.6 first-half goals in those games, the advantage in xG, shots on target and the 75% home win rate make the strongest signal HT/FT 1/1; therefore the recommended pick is 1/1.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Simba | Singida Black Stars | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.18 | 0.23 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.51 | 0.52 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Simba is 25% better for: last-5 form.
3 pts / game - Simba · 2.4 pts / game - Singida Black Stars
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Simba is 33% better for: goals scored per game.
1.81 goals / game - Simba · 1.36 goals / game - Singida Black Stars
Simba is 151% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.41 goals / game - Simba · 1.03 goals / game - Singida Black Stars
Simba scores in 81% of games (22 of 27 games), while Singida Black Stars keeps a clean sheet in 33% (11 of 33 games).
Singida Black Stars scores in 73% of games (24 of 33 games), while Simba keeps a clean sheet in 67% (18 of 27 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Simba
Over / Under - Singida Black Stars
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Simba is 54% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.19 pts / game - Simba · 1.42 pts / game - Singida Black Stars
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Simba - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 59% of games and wins 70%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Singida Black Stars - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 52%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 100% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 2.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (12 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (11 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Simba
Singida Black Stars
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).
Teams vs league
| Simba | Liga | Singida Black Stars | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.22 | 2.17 | ▲ 2.39 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 30% | 35% | ▲ 42% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 52% | 39% | ▲ 42% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 67% | 39% | ▼ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 70% | 60% | ▼ 48% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 67% | 63% | ▼ 61% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Simba's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Singida Black Stars. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Simba vs Singida Black Stars?
The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Simba 2:0 Singida Black Stars. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Simba vs Singida Black Stars?
Simba score 1.81 goals per game on average and Singida Black Stars 1.36. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 30% of Simba's matches and 42% of Singida Black Stars's.
What form are Simba and Singida Black Stars in?
Over the last 5 games Simba have a 5-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Singida Black Stars 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Simba vs Singida Black Stars?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Simba vs Singida Black Stars: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


