Italy - Serie C Group CData current as of September 12, 2026

Siracusa vs Audace Cerignola: match statistics

Siracusa crest
Siracusa
0 : 1half-time 0:0
Audace Cerignola crest
Audace Cerignola
145%(2.17)
X30%(3.12)
225%(3.14)

Siracusa display solid home form with a 45% win rate at home and a positive goal difference (+5) at their own stadium. The hosts score an average of 1.73 goals per match in home games, which, supported by 60% ball possession and a high xG (1.75), indicates offensive strength. Audace Cerignola have weaker away form with only a 40% win rate and a negative goal difference (-1) on the road, scoring just 1.1 goals on average per match. The recent form of both teams is even, but Siracusa's home advantage and better finishing efficiency (12% conversion vs 9%) speak in favor of the hosts. Nevertheless, the visitors' solid defense (30% clean sheets) and their tendency to draw (30%) suggest that the outcome could be tight, hence the relatively high probability of a draw.

Siracusa vs Audace Cerignola: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Siracusa played against Audace Cerignola in Serie C Group C (Italy). The game was played on January 18, 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Recent form

Siracusa has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Audace Cerignola has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss, with 1.20 points per game.

Scoring records

Siracusa scores 1.19 goals per game and allows 1.48. Audace Cerignola scores 1.29 and allows 1.38. Games in this league average 2.52 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 57% of Siracusa's games and 52% of Audace Cerignola's. The Over 2.5 rates are 57% and 52%, compared with league averages of 51% for BTTS and 49% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

The teams have nearly identical season xG averages at 1.53 per game. Siracusa takes 12.5 shots per game, while Audace Cerignola takes 12.9.

First-half and second-half trends

Siracusa leads at halftime in 29% of its games and scores 0.62 goals per game after halftime. Audace Cerignola leads at halftime in 19% and scores 0.81 after halftime.

When the teams score

Siracusa's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (6 goals). For Audace Cerignola, it is minutes 46-60 (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Serie C Group C games average 2.52 goals. Both teams score in 51% of games, and 49% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Siracusa display solid home form with a 45% win rate at home and a positive goal difference (+5) at their own stadium. The hosts score an average of 1.73 goals per match in home games, which, supported by 60% ball possession and a high xG (1.75), indicates offensive strength. Audace Cerignola have weaker away form with only a 40% win rate and a negative goal difference (-1) on the road, scoring just 1.1 goals on average per match. The recent form of both teams is even, but Siracusa's home advantage and better finishing efficiency (12% conversion vs 9%) speak in favor of the hosts. Nevertheless, the visitors' solid defense (30% clean sheets) and their tendency to draw (30%) suggest that the outcome could be tight, hence the relatively high probability of a draw.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

64Possession (%)36
SiracusaAudace Cerignola
14Shots5
SiracusaAudace Cerignola
6Shots on target3
SiracusaAudace Cerignola
2.06xG0.79
SiracusaAudace Cerignola
16Corners3
SiracusaAudace Cerignola
106Dangerous attacks36
SiracusaAudace Cerignola
14Fouls13
SiracusaAudace Cerignola
2Cards2
SiracusaAudace Cerignola

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

SiracusaAudace Cerignola
1.19Goals scored / game1.29
SiracusaAudace Cerignola
1.48Goals allowed / game1.38
SiracusaAudace Cerignola
61%Average possession48%
SiracusaAudace Cerignola
3.86Shots on target / game4.71
SiracusaAudace Cerignola

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

12.52Shots per game12.95
SiracusaAudace Cerignola
3.86Shots on target4.71
SiracusaAudace Cerignola
9.5%Shot conversion9.9%
SiracusaAudace Cerignola
61%Possession48%
SiracusaAudace Cerignola
1.53xG for1.53
SiracusaAudace Cerignola
1.23xG against1.3
SiracusaAudace Cerignola

Shooting quality

Siracusa: BalancedAudace Cerignola: Balanced
SiracusaAudace Cerignola
Accuracy (shots on target)31%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Siracusa is 33% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / game - Siracusa · 1.2 pts / game - Audace Cerignola

Siracusa
DDWWL
Season result split
29% W14% D57% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-3-12
1.00 pts / game · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-2-4
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
WDDWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.19BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Audace Cerignola
DDLDW
Season result split
33% W33% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-7-7
1.33 pts / game · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
4-3-3
Last 5 away
3-2-0
WWWDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.48Opponent xG: 1.33BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Audace Cerignola is 8% better for: goals scored per game.

1.19 goals / game - Siracusa · 1.29 goals / game - Audace Cerignola

Audace Cerignola is 7% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.48 goals / game - Siracusa · 1.38 goals / game - Audace Cerignola

Siracusa scoring profile: strong

Siracusa scores in 62% of games (13 of 21 meczów), while Audace Cerignola keeps a clean sheet in 33% (7 of 21 meczów).

Audace Cerignola scoring profile: very strong

Audace Cerignola scores in 71% of games (15 of 21 meczów), while Siracusa keeps a clean sheet in 5% (1 of 21 meczów).

25Goals scored (season)27
SiracusaAudace Cerignola
31Goals conceded (season)29
SiracusaAudace Cerignola
2.67Average goals per game2.67
SiracusaAudace Cerignola
9Goals scored (last 5)7
SiracusaAudace Cerignola
5Goals conceded (last 5)7
SiracusaAudace Cerignola

How often they score at least...

62%1 goal71%
SiracusaAudace Cerignola
33%2 goals38%
SiracusaAudace Cerignola
19%3 goals14%
SiracusaAudace Cerignola
5%4 goals5%
SiracusaAudace Cerignola

How often they concede at least...

95%1 goal67%
SiracusaAudace Cerignola
38%2 goals43%
SiracusaAudace Cerignola
14%3 goals19%
SiracusaAudace Cerignola
0%4 goals10%
SiracusaAudace Cerignola

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

52%
Audace Cerignola - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.11 of 21 meczów
51%
League average

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time24%
SiracusaAudace Cerignola
0%BTTS in both halves5%
SiracusaAudace Cerignola
24%Scored in both halves24%
SiracusaAudace Cerignola

BTTS and goal count

48%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
SiracusaAudace Cerignola
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
SiracusaAudace Cerignola
60%BTTS - last 560%
SiracusaAudace Cerignola

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time62%
SiracusaAudace Cerignola
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
SiracusaAudace Cerignola
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
SiracusaAudace Cerignola

2nd half

90%Min. 1 goal after half-time76%
SiracusaAudace Cerignola
43%Min. 2 goals after half-time43%
SiracusaAudace Cerignola
24%Min. 3 goals after half-time24%
SiracusaAudace Cerignola

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Siracusa is 21% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.33 pts / game - Siracusa · 1.1 pts / game - Audace Cerignola

Siracusa - half-time state
29% leading48% draw24% trailing
Audace Cerignola - half-time state
19% leading52% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.33Points per game (1st half)1.1
SiracusaAudace Cerignola
0.57Goals scored (1st half)0.48
SiracusaAudace Cerignola
0.48Goals conceded (1st half)0.62
SiracusaAudace Cerignola
1.05Average goals (1st half)1.1
SiracusaAudace Cerignola
52%Clean sheet before half-time57%
SiracusaAudace Cerignola
57%No goal before half-time57%
SiracusaAudace Cerignola

After half-time (2nd half)

1.05Points per game (2nd half)1.33
SiracusaAudace Cerignola
0.62Goals scored (2nd half)0.81
SiracusaAudace Cerignola
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.76
SiracusaAudace Cerignola
1.62Average goals (2nd half)1.57
SiracusaAudace Cerignola
29%Clean sheet after half-time48%
SiracusaAudace Cerignola
57%No goal after half-time48%
SiracusaAudace Cerignola

Siracusa - second-half results

29% W19% D52% L
28
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 29%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.5

Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Audace Cerignola - second-half results

33% W33% D33% L
23
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.10
PPG before half-time
Lead holding174%

Leads at halftime in 19% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Siracusa - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.601.20
Goals scored / game1.40.4
Goals allowed / game0.40.6
Average goals per game1.81.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%0%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+5-1
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 7
Audace Cerignola - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.00
Goals scored / game0.80.6
Goals allowed / game0.80.6
Average goals per game1.61.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Siracusa
ScoredConceded
6
2
0-15
1
5
16-30
5
3
31-45
5
5
46-60
4
9
61-75
4
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Audace Cerignola
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
2
5
16-30
5
4
31-45
7
4
46-60
4
6
61-75
6
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.67
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.3 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+50%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
44%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Siracusa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.30
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.59
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
138%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.60
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 24% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

Audace Cerignola

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
121%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
95%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group C).

Teams vs league

SiracusaLigaAudace Cerignola
Average goals per game 2.672.52 2.67
Both teams scored 57%51% 52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 57%49% 52%
Clean sheets 5%28% 33%
Goal before half-time 67%65% 62%
Goal after half-time 90%78% 76%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.52
Average goals per game
51%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.45
Home goals / game
1.07
Away goals / game
+36%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defensive advantage
+13%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
65%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Audace CerignolaYellow cardGaetano Vitale
  2. SiracusaSubstitutionOn: Giulio FrisennaOff: Ernestas Gudelevičius
  3. SiracusaYellow cardFederico Pacciardi
  4. Audace CerignolaGoalDiego Gambale
  5. Audace CerignolaSubstitutionOn: Athanasios NtampizasOff: Diego Gambale
  6. Audace CerignolaSubstitutionOn: Ernesto BallabileOff: Claudio Parlato
  7. SiracusaSubstitutionOn: Mattia MorrealeOff: Sebastiano Sassi
  8. Audace CerignolaYellow cardAthanasios Ntampizas
  9. SiracusaYellow cardMaiko Candiano

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Siracusa's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Audace Cerignola. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

Audace Cerignola
3 : 1
Siracusa

FAQ

What was the result of Siracusa vs Audace Cerignola?

The Serie C Group C match finished Siracusa 0:1 Audace Cerignola. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Siracusa vs Audace Cerignola?

Siracusa score 1.19 goals per game on average and Audace Cerignola 1.29. The Serie C Group C average is 2.52 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Siracusa's matches and 52% of Audace Cerignola's.

What form are Siracusa and Audace Cerignola in?

Over the last 5 games Siracusa have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Audace Cerignola 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Siracusa vs Audace Cerignola?

The statistical background for Siracusa vs Audace Cerignola — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.