Siracusa vs Salernitana: match statistics
Salernitana presents decidedly better form this season with 11 victories and just 3 losses overall, while Siracusa has only 5 wins against 11 defeats. The visitors show high efficiency on the road with 56% wins and an average of 1.33 goals per match, which, combined with a solid conversion rate of 11%, gives them an offensive advantage. Siracusa, despite winning 40% of home games, has poor recent form with only 1.2 points per match in the last 5 fixtures and a mere 10% clean sheets in home matches. Salernitana records 1.6 points per match in the last five games and a higher xG value (1.55 vs 1.78 for the hosts), suggesting stability. The difference in goal difference (+3 for Siracusa in home matches vs -1 for Salernitana on the road) does not compensate for the visitors' overall advantage in quality of play and consistency of results.
Siracusa vs Salernitana: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Siracusa played against Salernitana in Serie C Group C (Italy). The game was played on January 4, 2026. Final score: 3:1.
Recent form
Siracusa has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Salernitana has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Siracusa scores 1.16 goals per game and allows 1.53. Salernitana scores 1.42 and allows 1.21. Games in this league average 2.58 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 58% of Siracusa's games and 68% of Salernitana's. The Over 2.5 rates are 58% and 58%, compared with league averages of 54% for BTTS and 51% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Salernitana has the higher season xG average, 1.69 to 1.58 per game. Siracusa takes 13.0 shots per game, while Salernitana takes 13.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Siracusa leads at halftime in 26% of its games and scores 0.63 goals per game after halftime. Salernitana leads at halftime in 21% and scores 0.89 after halftime.
When the teams score
Siracusa's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (5 goals). For Salernitana, it is minutes 46-60 (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Serie C Group C games average 2.58 goals. Both teams score in 54% of games, and 51% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Salernitana presents decidedly better form this season with 11 victories and just 3 losses overall, while Siracusa has only 5 wins against 11 defeats. The visitors show high efficiency on the road with 56% wins and an average of 1.33 goals per match, which, combined with a solid conversion rate of 11%, gives them an offensive advantage. Siracusa, despite winning 40% of home games, has poor recent form with only 1.2 points per match in the last 5 fixtures and a mere 10% clean sheets in home matches. Salernitana records 1.6 points per match in the last five games and a higher xG value (1.55 vs 1.78 for the hosts), suggesting stability. The difference in goal difference (+3 for Siracusa in home matches vs -1 for Salernitana on the road) does not compensate for the visitors' overall advantage in quality of play and consistency of results.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Siracusa | Salernitana | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Salernitana is 33% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - Siracusa · 1.6 pts / game - Salernitana
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Salernitana is 22% better for: goals scored per game.
1.16 goals / game - Siracusa · 1.42 goals / game - Salernitana
Salernitana is 26% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.53 goals / game - Siracusa · 1.21 goals / game - Salernitana
Siracusa scores in 63% of games (12 of 19 meczów), while Salernitana keeps a clean sheet in 26% (5 of 19 meczów).
Salernitana scores in 84% of games (16 of 19 meczów), while Siracusa keeps a clean sheet in 5% (1 of 19 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Siracusa
Over / Under - Salernitana
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Siracusa is 9% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.26 pts / game - Siracusa · 1.16 pts / game - Salernitana
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Siracusa - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 26% of games and wins 26%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Salernitana - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 58%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Siracusa
Salernitana
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group C).
Teams vs league
| Siracusa | Liga | Salernitana | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.68 | 2.58 | • 2.63 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 58% | 54% | ▲ 68% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 58% | 51% | ▲ 58% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 5% | 27% | • 26% |
| Goal before half-time | • 68% | 68% | • 68% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 89% | 79% | ▼ 68% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Other recorded players
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- SiracusaGoalSebastiano Di Paolo Vlad
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Siracusa's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Salernitana. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Siracusa vs Salernitana?
The Serie C Group C match finished Siracusa 3:1 Salernitana. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Siracusa vs Salernitana?
Siracusa score 1.16 goals per game on average and Salernitana 1.42. The Serie C Group C average is 2.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Siracusa's matches and 68% of Salernitana's.
What form are Siracusa and Salernitana in?
Over the last 5 games Siracusa have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Salernitana 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Siracusa vs Salernitana?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.