United States - MLSPayPal ParkData current as of August 30, 2026

SJ Earthquakes vs Minnesota United: match statistics

SJ Earthquakes vs Minnesota United: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

SJ Earthquakes played against Minnesota United in MLS (United States). The game was played on August 23, 2026. Venue: PayPal Park. Final score: 1:5.

Recent form

SJ Earthquakes has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.20 points per game. Minnesota United has 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses, with 0.60 points per game.

Scoring records

SJ Earthquakes scores 1.90 goals per game and allows 1.40. Minnesota United scores 1.10 and allows 1.40. Games in this league average 3.19 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 60% of SJ Earthquakes's games and 60% of Minnesota United's. The Over 2.5 rates are 60% and 50%, compared with league averages of 63% for BTTS and 61% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

SJ Earthquakes has the higher season xG average, 1.57 to 1.50 per game. SJ Earthquakes takes 14.1 shots per game, while Minnesota United takes 13.3.

First-half and second-half trends

SJ Earthquakes leads at halftime in 35% of its games and scores 1.05 goals per game after halftime. Minnesota United leads at halftime in 20% and scores 0.70 after halftime.

When the teams score

SJ Earthquakes's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (9 goals). For Minnesota United, it is minutes 61-75 (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

MLS games average 3.19 goals. Both teams score in 63% of games, and 61% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

SJ Earthquakes possess a clear attacking edge at home: they average 1.8 goals and create chances worth 1.91 xG, while Minnesota United allow opponents 1.66 xG away from home and concede 2 goals per match. The hosts also record significantly more shots, averaging 17.4 compared with 12.3, including 6.7 shots on target versus 5.2 for the visitors. However, Minnesota arrive in more stable recent defensive form, having conceded just 5 goals in their last 5 matches, compared with 13 for San Jose. The visitors have drawn 3 of their last 5 games, increasing the risk of a closely contested match, but their away goal difference stands at -6, and they keep a clean sheet in only 10% of such fixtures. The superior quality of chances created and home advantage give San Jose a slightly higher probability of victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The case for BTTS - Yes is primarily supported by current form: in their last 5 matches, both teams recorded this outcome in 80% of games. San Jose scored an average of 1.4 goals during this period but conceded as many as 2.6, creating highly favorable conditions for Minnesota’s attack. Minnesota averages 5.2 shots on target per match, with an xG of 1.46, while the hosts allow opponents an xG of 1.23. The hosts do have a modest season average of just 0.78 goals scored and kept a clean sheet in 44% of matches, but the visitors’ defense has recorded only 10% clean sheets and concedes an average of 2.0 goals away from home. San Jose’s season BTTS rate is only 33%, but the combination of the current run, Minnesota’s high BTTS rate of 80%, and the league average of 62% gives the “yes” option a slight but clear edge.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Minnesota averages 1.40 goals scored and as many as 2.00 goals conceded in away matches, with 90% of their games finishing above the 1.5-goal line. At home, the hosts create chances worth an average of 1.55 xG, while the visitors’ defense allows opponents 1.66 xG, which strongly supports SJ Earthquakes scoring at least once. In their last five matches, the Earthquakes conceded 13 goals, or 2.60 per game, while both teams found the net in 80% of those fixtures. The projected total of 2.95 goals points to strong attacking potential, although the hosts’ seasonal rate of just 11% of matches finishing above 2.5 goals lowers confidence in higher lines. Therefore, the most reliable choice is Over 1.5 goals, as the data from both teams strongly points to at least two goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is the most likely starting point, as Minnesota were level at the break in 40% of their matches, compared with 33% for San Jose. The hosts score just 0.22 goals per match before half-time, but Minnesota concede as many as 1.10 goals during this period, which limits the visitors’ advantage and supports an evenly balanced opening. After the break, San Jose score an average of 0.56 goals and concede only 0.22, while Minnesota allow 0.90 goals and have a second-half goal balance of -1. In addition, the hosts averaged 1.78 points in the second half compared with Minnesota’s 1.10, making a draw at half-time followed by a San Jose win at full-time the most logical scenario.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 3
First half
0 : 2
Second half

Game stats

58Possession (%)42
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
11Shots11
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
6Shots on target7
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
1.37xG1.45
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
3Corners3
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
35Dangerous attacks37
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
14Fouls15
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
1Cards0
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
1.9Goals scored / game1.1
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
1.4Goals allowed / game1.4
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
48%Average possession47%
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
5.2Shots on target / game4.7
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

14.05Shots per game13.3
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
5.2Shots on target4.7
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
13.5%Shot conversion8.3%
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
48%Possession47%
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
1.57xG for1.5
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
1.46xG against1.44
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United

Shooting quality

SJ Earthquakes: AttackingMinnesota United: Balanced
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
Accuracy (shots on target)37%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.23

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Minnesota United is 200% better for: last-5 form.

0.2 pts / game - SJ Earthquakes · 0.6 pts / game - Minnesota United

SJ Earthquakes
LDLLL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
50% W15% R35% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-3-7
1.65 pts / game · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-2-4
Last 5 at home
0-2-3
DLLDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.55Opponent xG: 1.65BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Minnesota United
LDDDL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
30% W35% R35% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-7-7
1.25 pts / game · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
4-2-4
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WWLLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.61Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

SJ Earthquakes is 73% better for: goals scored per game.

1.9 goals / game - SJ Earthquakes · 1.1 goals / game - Minnesota United

SJ Earthquakes scoring profile: very strong

SJ Earthquakes scores in 85% of games (17 of 20 meczów), while Minnesota United keeps a clean sheet in 25% (5 of 20 meczów).

Minnesota United scoring profile: very strong

Minnesota United scores in 75% of games (15 of 20 meczów), while SJ Earthquakes keeps a clean sheet in 25% (5 of 20 meczów).

38Goals scored (season)22
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
28Goals conceded (season)28
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
3.3Average goals per game2.5
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
4Goals scored (last 5)4
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
13Goals conceded (last 5)6
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United

How often they score at least...

85%1 goal75%
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
55%2 goals30%
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
35%3 goals5%
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
10%4 goals0%
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal75%
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
30%2 goals40%
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
25%3 goals10%
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
10%4 goals5%
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

60%
Minnesota United - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.12 of 20 meczów
63%
League average

Goal patterns

30%BTTS at half-time20%
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
15%BTTS in both halves5%
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
35%Scored in both halves10%
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United

BTTS and goal count

45%Min. 3 goals and BTTS45%
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
15%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
60%BTTS - last 580%
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

85%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time70%
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
45%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
30%Min. 3 goals after half-time15%
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

SJ Earthquakes is 53% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.45 pts / game - SJ Earthquakes · 0.95 pts / game - Minnesota United

SJ Earthquakes - half-time state
35% leading40% draw25% trailing
Minnesota United - half-time state
20% leading35% draw45% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.45Points per game (1st half)0.95
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
0.85Goals scored (1st half)0.4
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
0.65Goals conceded (1st half)0.8
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
1.5Average goals (1st half)1.2
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
45%Clean sheet before half-time40%
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
40%No goal before half-time65%
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United

After half-time (2nd half)

1.4Points per game (2nd half)1.4
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
1.05Goals scored (2nd half)0.7
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
0.75Goals conceded (2nd half)0.6
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
1.8Average goals (2nd half)1.3
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
55%Clean sheet after half-time45%
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
40%No goal after half-time50%
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United

SJ Earthquakes - second-half results

35% W35% R30% P
29
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.45
PPG before half-time
Lead holding143%

Leads at halftime in 35% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Minnesota United - second-half results

30% W50% R20% P
19
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.95
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 30%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.2

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

SJ Earthquakes - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.400.80
Goals scored / game0.20.6
Goals allowed / game1.21.4
Average goals per game1.42.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-5-4
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Minnesota United - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.000.80
Goals scored / game0.20.6
Goals allowed / game0.40.8
Average goals per game0.61.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

SJ Earthquakes
ScoredConceded
7
6
0-15
4
5
16-30
6
2
31-45
9
6
46-60
4
2
61-75
8
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Minnesota United
ScoredConceded
2
7
0-15
2
5
16-30
4
4
31-45
4
6
46-60
6
2
61-75
4
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.90
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.6 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
91%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
64%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

SJ Earthquakes

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.39
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
103%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
104%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-1.45
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Minnesota United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.36
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
81%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
76%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.65
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

SJ EarthquakesLigaMinnesota United
Average goals per game 3.303.19 2.50
Both teams scored 60%63% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 60%61% 50%
Clean sheets 25%21% 25%
Goal before half-time 85%76% 75%
Goal after half-time 75%81% 70%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.19
Average goals per game
63%
Both teams scored
61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.84
Home goals / game
1.35
Away goals / game
+36%
Home attack advantage
+27%
Home defensive advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
51%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. SJ EarthquakesGoalTimo Werner
  2. Minnesota UnitedGoalJoaquín Nicolás PereyraAssist: Anthony Markanich
  3. Minnesota UnitedGoalKelvin Kwarteng YeboahAssist: Kyle Duncan
  4. Minnesota UnitedGoalKelvin Kwarteng YeboahAssist: Owen Géne
  5. SJ EarthquakesSubstitutionOn: Ian HarkesOff: Jonathan Alexander González Mendoza
  6. SJ EarthquakesSubstitutionOn: Darius JohnsonOff: Timo Werner
  7. Minnesota UnitedGoalMarcus CaldeiraAssist: Kyle Duncan
  8. SJ EarthquakesSubstitutionOn: Jamar RickettsOff: Vítor Costa de Brito
  9. SJ EarthquakesYellow cardBenjamin Kikanovic
  10. Minnesota UnitedSubstitutionOn: Devin PadelfordOff: Anthony Markanich

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of SJ Earthquakes vs Minnesota United?

The MLS match finished SJ Earthquakes 1:5 Minnesota United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before SJ Earthquakes vs Minnesota United?

SJ Earthquakes score 1.90 goals per game on average and Minnesota United 1.10. The MLS average is 3.19 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 60% of SJ Earthquakes's matches and 60% of Minnesota United's.

What form are SJ Earthquakes and Minnesota United in?

Over the last 5 games SJ Earthquakes have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Minnesota United 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for SJ Earthquakes vs Minnesota United?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for SJ Earthquakes vs Minnesota United: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.