SJK Akatemia vs JäPS: match statistics
SJK Akatemia vs JäPS: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
SJK Akatemia played against JäPS in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The game was played on May 9, 2026. Final score: 0:2.
Recent form
SJK Akatemia has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. JäPS has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
SJK Akatemia scores 0.80 goals per game and allows 1.00. JäPS scores 1.00 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.43 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 40% of SJK Akatemia's games and 0% of JäPS's. The Over 2.5 rates are 20% and 40%, compared with league averages of 43% for BTTS and 43% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
JäPS has the higher season xG average, 1.01 to 0.90 per game. SJK Akatemia takes 6.4 shots per game, while JäPS takes 7.6.
First-half and second-half trends
SJK Akatemia leads at halftime in 20% of its games and scores 0.60 goals per game after halftime. JäPS leads at halftime in 60% and scores 0.20 after halftime.
When the teams score
SJK Akatemia's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (2 goals). For JäPS, it is minutes 16-30 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ykkösliiga games average 2.43 goals. Both teams score in 43% of games, and 43% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 2 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I project a home win (SJK Akatemia). At home SJK averages 0.5 goals scored and 0.5 goals conceded per match, records a 50% clean sheet rate and a 50% home win rate, with average xG for 0.76 and xG against 2.17. JäPS away averages 0 goals scored, 100% of matches without scoring and concedes 2.5 goals per match on average, although overall they have won 4 of their last 5 matches and scored 15 goals. Both teams have similar xG for (0.76 vs 0.77), but JäPS produces more on-target shots away (3 vs 1.5) with lower possession (36% vs 49%), indicating chance creation but low away efficiency. Considering SJK’s solid home defense and JäPS’s away issues, I assess probabilities as 60% home, 25% draw and 15% away.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Season metrics strongly favor No BTTS: SJK Akatemia has 100% clean sheets and 0% BTTS this season, while JäPS has 0% season BTTS and 50% clean sheets. League-wide the share of clean sheets is also high — the league has 76% clean sheets and only 36% BTTS matches. This is contrasted by JäPS form over the last 5 matches: 15 goals scored (3.0 per match) and recent offensive xG of 1.75, indicating they can score, whereas SJK over the last 5 has 6 goals (1.2 per match) and recent offensive xG of 1.57. Additionally, JäPS concedes on average 2.5 goals per match seasonally with xG against 1.95, while SJK has season xG against 1.08 and seasonally 0.0 goals conceded, which favors a defensive struggle and a clean sheet expected for SJK. Considering SJK’s defensive edge (100% clean sheets), 0% season BTTS for both teams and the strong league trend (76% clean sheets), I assign 25% probability to BTTS - Yes and 75% to No Goal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-based model indicates 1.56 expected goals for SJK Akatemia (home attack xG 1.18 vs JäPS defense xG 1.95) and 0.93 for JäPS (away attack xG 0.77 vs home defense xG 1.08), totaling 2.49 expected goals. This total of 2.49 is above the league average of 2.24 and is supported by the visitors' form, who have scored 15 goals in the last 5 matches (3.0 per game), while the hosts have scored 6 goals in the last 5 (1.2 per game). A Poisson distribution with parameter 2.49 yields roughly a 71% probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), about 45% for at least 3 goals (Over 2.5) and around 24% for a minimum of 4 goals (Over 3.5). Additionally, SJK records 4.33 shots on target and 9.33 shots overall per game, and JäPS has a last-5 average xG of 1.75, which supports a multi-goal scenario. The strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5 (71%), therefore I recommend backing the Over 1.5 line as the best choice.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
SJK Akatemia holds a clear advantage in home metrics: they led at the break in 3 of 3 home matches (100%), averaging 1.33 goals by half-time and conceding none. Additionally, their average xG is 1.18 versus JäPS’s 0.77, and the hosts register 9.33 shots (4.33 on target) compared to the visitors’ 5.0 (3.0 on target), indicating markedly stronger offensive pressure from SJK. JäPS has a season average of 0.0 goals scored and concedes 2.5 goals per match; they concede on average 2.0 goals after the break, so a second-half turnaround is unlikely. The hosts have 100% clean sheets at home and an 18% shot conversion rate, while the visitors have 0% conversion; therefore the most likely scenario is SJK leading at the break and winning at full-time (HT/FT 1/1). Based on this I assign probabilities: 1/1 60%, 1/X 15%, X/1 8%, X/X 8%, and the remaining distribution: 1/2 3%, X/2 2%, 2/1 2%, 2/X 1%, 2/2 1%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| SJK Akatemia | JäPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 28% | 50% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.44 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
JäPS is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - SJK Akatemia · 2 pts / game - JäPS
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
JäPS is 25% better for: goals scored per game.
0.8 goals / game - SJK Akatemia · 1 goals / game - JäPS
SJK Akatemia scores in 60% of games (3 of 5 meczów), while JäPS keeps a clean sheet in 80% (4 of 5 meczów).
JäPS scores in 60% of games (3 of 5 meczów), while SJK Akatemia keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - SJK Akatemia
Over / Under - JäPS
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
JäPS is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / game - SJK Akatemia · 2 pts / game - JäPS
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
SJK Akatemia - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 20%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
JäPS - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 60% of games and wins 60%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
SJK Akatemia
JäPS
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| SJK Akatemia | Liga | JäPS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.80 | 2.43 | ▼ 2.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 40% | 43% | ▼ 0% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 20% | 43% | ▼ 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 34% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal before half-time | • 60% | 61% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | • 60% | 61% | ▼ 40% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from SJK Akatemia's perspective: 1 win, 2 draws and 0 losses against JäPS. Games average 3.67 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of SJK Akatemia vs JäPS?
The Ykkösliiga match finished SJK Akatemia 0:2 JäPS. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between SJK Akatemia and JäPS?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches SJK Akatemia won 1, JäPS won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 3.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before SJK Akatemia vs JäPS?
SJK Akatemia score 0.80 goals per game on average and JäPS 1.00. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.43 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 43% of games. Both teams score in 40% of SJK Akatemia's matches and 0% of JäPS's.
What form are SJK Akatemia and JäPS in?
Over the last 5 games SJK Akatemia have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and JäPS 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for SJK Akatemia vs JäPS?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.