Faroe Islands - Faroe Islands Premier LeagueUndir MýruhjallaData current as of September 06, 2026

Skála vs KÍ: match statistics

Skála crest
Skála
1 : 4half-time 1:2
KÍ crest

Skála vs KÍ: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Skála played against KÍ in Faroe Islands Premier League (Faroe Islands). The game was played on June 14, 2026. Venue: Undir Mýruhjalla. Final score: 1:4.

Recent form

Skála has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. KÍ has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.20 points per game.

Scoring records

Skála scores 0.92 goals per game and allows 1.25. KÍ scores 2.08 and allows 0.67. Games in this league average 2.79 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 58% of Skála's games and 67% of KÍ's. The Over 2.5 rates are 58% and 42%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 52% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

KÍ has the higher season xG average, 1.92 to 1.47 per game. Skála takes 11.8 shots per game, while KÍ takes 15.5.

First-half and second-half trends

Skála leads at halftime in 8% of its games and scores 0.75 goals per game after halftime. KÍ leads at halftime in 58% and scores 0.92 after halftime.

When the teams score

Skála's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (6 goals). For KÍ, it is minutes 31-45+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Faroe Islands Premier League games average 2.79 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 52% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 0.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

KÍ is the clear favorite: they sit 1st in the table while Skála are 8th, and KÍ are unbeaten away (0% losses) with 50% wins and 50% draws versus Skála’s 29% wins and 43% losses at home. In attack KÍ have a large advantage — averaging 2.17 goals per away match compared to Skála’s 1.29 at home, and in the last 5 matches KÍ scored 13 goals versus Skála’s 5. Defensively KÍ are superior as well: they concede 0.67 goals away on average, while Skála concede 1.43 at home; average xG are 2.41 for KÍ and 1.62 for Skála, with xG against 0.91 vs 1.54, confirming higher quality created and allowed chances. KÍ also attempt significantly more shots (20 vs 12.29) and more shots on target (7.67 vs 4.86) and enjoy higher possession (63% vs 48%), translating into more clear-cut opportunities with similar shot conversion rates (11% vs 10%). Considering the higher average points per game in the last 5 matches (2.6 vs 1.4) and all the above advantages, I predict an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams have a season BTTS rate of 67% (Skála 67%, KÍ 67%), providing a strong baseline signal for BTTS. In the last 5 matches KÍ recorded BTTS in 100% and Skála in 60%, while seasonally both concede on average 0.67 goals per game, suggesting frequent goal exchanges. KÍ generates on average xG 2.41 and 7.67 shots on target (20.0 shots total) versus Skála xG 1.44 and 3.83 shots on target (11.0 overall); however Skála has a higher conversion rate 18% vs 11%, so despite fewer shots the home side can capitalize on chances. Season clean sheet rate is 33% for both teams, and in the last 5 matches both teams conceded on average 1.0 (Skála) and 1.2 (KÍ) goals, which further supports goals from both sides. Based on this I give BTTS 80% vs 20% and select 'BTTS - Yes' as the best tip, because the consistently high season rate of 67%, KÍ's perfect run (100% in L5) and the offensive metrics (xG 2.41 and 1.44, 7.67 vs 3.83 shots on target) strongly favor both teams scoring.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Both teams display offensive metrics: KÍ has xG_for 2.41 and averages 2.17 goals per game, Skála has xG_for 1.44 and averages 2.00 goals; additionally both have BTTS in 67% of matches. To calculate expected goals I used season xG and form from the last 5 matches; for the home side (1.44, 0.91, 1.62, 1.15) I obtained expected_goals_home 1.28, and for the visitors (2.41, 0.92, 2.14, 1.64) expected_goals_away 1.78, which totals 3.06. A Poisson model with λ=3.06 shows the probability of ≥2 goals (Over 1.5) is about 81%, ≥3 goals (Over 2.5) about 59%, and ≥4 goals (Over 3.5) about 37%. Additionally KÍ averages 7.67 shots on target versus Skála’s 3.83 and has scored 13 goals in the last 5 matches (Skála 5), confirming the visitors’ greater scoring potential. Therefore I recommend a stake on Over 1.5 as the strongest signal: season Over1.5 rates are 67% for Skála and 83% for KÍ, and the modelled 81% gives a clear edge here.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Skála led at the break in 5 of their matches so far (83%) and average 1.5 goals by half-time with 0.0 conceded, which strongly indicates a home lead at the break. However, KÍ have higher xG (2.41 vs 1.44) and considerably more shots (20 vs 11) and shots on target (7.67 vs 3.83), giving the visitors an advantage in creating chances. In second halves the visitors score on average 1.33 goals and win the second half in 67% of cases, while the hosts score 0.5 goals and win only 17% of second halves; in second-half points the visitors have collected 14 versus 5 for the home side (average 2.33 vs 0.83 points). Both teams have had matches this season where both sides scored in 67% of fixtures, so a comeback and equalizer is realistic. Given Skála’s 83% probability of leading at half-time combined with KÍ’s dominance after the break, the most likely scenario is a home lead at half-time with a visitors’ turnaround to win full-time (HT/FT 1/2, assigned 32%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 2
First half
0 : 2
Second half

Game stats

37Possession (%)63
Skála
9Shots22
Skála
4Shots on target10
Skála
1.3xG2.51
Skála
10Corners4
Skála
62Dangerous attacks59
Skála
7Fouls9
Skála
1Cards1
Skála

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

0.92Goals scored / game2.08
Skála
1.25Goals allowed / game0.67
Skála
46%Average possession61%
Skála
3.75Shots on target / game5.75
Skála

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.83Shots per game15.5
Skála
3.75Shots on target5.75
Skála
7.7%Shot conversion13.4%
Skála
46%Possession61%
Skála
1.47xG for1.92
Skála
1.53xG against0.92
Skála

Shooting quality

Skála: Balanced: Dominant
Skála
Accuracy (shots on target)32%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.250.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

KÍ is 57% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / game - Skála · 2.2 pts / game - KÍ

Skála
DWLLW
Season result split
17% W33% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-4-6
0.83 pts / game · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-2-3
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
DDWLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.62Opponent xG: 1.64BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
DDWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
58% W42% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-5-0
2.17 pts / game · goal difference +17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
3-3-0
Last 5 away
2-3-0
DDWDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 2.09Opponent xG: 1.00BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KÍ is 126% better for: goals scored per game.

0.92 goals / game - Skála · 2.08 goals / game - KÍ

KÍ is 87% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.25 goals / game - Skála · 0.67 goals / game - KÍ

Skála scoring profile: strong

Skála scores in 67% of games (8 of 12 meczów), while KÍ keeps a clean sheet in 33% (4 of 12 meczów).

KÍ scoring profile: very strong

KÍ scores in 83% of games (10 of 12 meczów), while Skála keeps a clean sheet in 33% (4 of 12 meczów).

11Goals scored (season)25
Skála
15Goals conceded (season)8
Skála
2.17Average goals per game2.75
Skála
5Goals scored (last 5)9
Skála
5Goals conceded (last 5)4
Skála

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal83%
Skála
17%2 goals50%
Skála
8%3 goals25%
Skála
0%4 goals25%
Skála

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal67%
Skála
50%2 goals0%
Skála
8%3 goals0%
Skála
0%4 goals0%
Skála

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

8%BTTS at half-time8%
Skála
8%BTTS in both halves0%
Skála
8%Scored in both halves25%
Skála

BTTS and goal count

58%Min. 3 goals and BTTS42%
Skála
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Skála
60%BTTS - last 580%
Skála

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time83%
Skála
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
Skála
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
Skála

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
Skála
42%Min. 2 goals after half-time25%
Skála
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
Skála

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KÍ is 141% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.83 pts / game - Skála · 2 pts / game - KÍ

Skála - half-time state
8% leading58% draw33% trailing
KÍ - half-time state
58% leading25% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.83Points per game (1st half)2
Skála
0.17Goals scored (1st half)1.17
Skála
0.58Goals conceded (1st half)0.25
Skála
0.75Average goals (1st half)1.42
Skála
58%Clean sheet before half-time75%
Skála
83%No goal before half-time33%
Skála

After half-time (2nd half)

1.33Points per game (2nd half)1.58
Skála
0.75Goals scored (2nd half)0.92
Skála
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)0.42
Skála
1.42Average goals (2nd half)1.33
Skála
50%Clean sheet after half-time58%
Skála
42%No goal after half-time58%
Skála

Skála - second-half results

25% W58% R17% P
10
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.83
PPG before half-time
Lead holding213%

Leads at halftime in 8% of games and wins 17%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

KÍ - second-half results

42% W33% R25% P
24
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+11
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 58% of games and wins 58%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Skála - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.60
Goals scored / game0.20.8
Goals allowed / game0.40.6
Average goals per game0.61.4
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
KÍ - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.40
Goals scored / game1.00.8
Goals allowed / game0.40.4
Average goals per game1.41.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+3+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Skála
ScoredConceded
0
4
0-15
1
2
16-30
1
1
31-45
0
5
46-60
6
1
61-75
3
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
5
1
16-30
7
1
31-45
5
2
46-60
2
1
61-75
4
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.46
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
0.8 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
88%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Skála

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.27
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.55
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
62%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
95%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.57
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.41
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
159%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
45%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Faroe Islands Premier League).

Teams vs league

SkálaLiga
Average goals per game 2.172.79 2.75
Both teams scored 58%55% 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 58%52% 42%
Clean sheets 33%28% 33%
Goal before half-time 50%66% 83%
Goal after half-time 67%77% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.79
Average goals per game
55%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.48
Home goals / game
1.31
Away goals / game
+13%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defensive advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
29%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Skála's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against . Games average 0.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Skála vs KÍ?

The Faroe Islands Premier League match finished Skála 1:4 KÍ. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Skála vs KÍ?

Skála score 0.92 goals per game on average and KÍ 2.08. The Faroe Islands Premier League average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Skála's matches and 67% of KÍ's.

What form are Skála and KÍ in?

Over the last 5 games Skála have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and KÍ 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Skála vs KÍ?

The statistical background for Skála vs KÍ — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.