Latvia - 1. LigaData current as of 23 July 2026

Skanste vs Rīgas FS II: match statistics

Skanste crest
Skanste
4 : 0half-time 0:0
Rīgas FS II crest
Rīgas FS II

Skanste vs Rīgas FS II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Skanste play Rīgas FS II in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match date is 10 May 2026 at 12:00. Final score: 4:0.

Current form

Skanste: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Rīgas FS II: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Skanste scores 1.54 and concedes 2.08 goals per match. Rīgas FS II scores 1.23 and concedes 2.08. League average: 3.43 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Skanste 46%, Rīgas FS II 54%. Over 2.5: Skanste 69%, Rīgas FS II 69%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 68%.

xG, shots and style

Skanste has higher xG: 1.44 vs 1.37. Skanste: 9.8 shots per match, Rīgas FS II: 8.9.

Match halves

Skanste: half-time lead 8%, second-half goals 0.92. Rīgas FS II: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.54.

Goals by minute

Skanste: 46-60 (8 goals). Rīgas FS II: 0-15 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

1. Liga: 3.43 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 68%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 0-0-2. Average goals 3.50, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Skanste holds a clear offensive advantage: they scored 9 goals in the last 5 matches versus only 2 for Rīgas FS II, while the home side averages 1.4 points per match in this period compared to 0.2 for the visitors. At home Skanste averages 11.33 shots per match, with 3.33 on target, scoring 1.33 goals on average with an xG of 1.37; Rīgas FS II on the road average 6.5 shots (1.5 on target) and 0.0 goals per match with an xG of 0.91. The visitors have failed to score in away matches (percentage of matches without a goal 100%) and have a 0% shot conversion rate away, whereas Skanste have a 12% conversion at home, indicating a significant advantage in chance finishing quality. Defensively the average goals conceded are 1.0 for the home side at home and 1.0 for the visitors away, but across the season Rīgas FS II have conceded 15 goals versus 10 for Skanste, suggesting bigger defensive issues for the visitors. Considering the home advantage in chance creation and conversion and the visitors’ goalless away form, I predict a Skanste victory.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
4 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

60Possession (%)40
SkansteRīgas FS II
6Shots10
SkansteRīgas FS II
5Shots on target2
SkansteRīgas FS II
1.08xG1.35
SkansteRīgas FS II
6Corners7
SkansteRīgas FS II
48Dangerous attacks79
SkansteRīgas FS II
10Fouls8
SkansteRīgas FS II
0Cards0
SkansteRīgas FS II

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.54Goals scored / match1.23
SkansteRīgas FS II
2.08Goals conceded / match2.08
SkansteRīgas FS II
40%Average possession44%
SkansteRīgas FS II
4.31Shots on target / match3.54
SkansteRīgas FS II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.85Shots per match8.92
SkansteRīgas FS II
4.31Shots on target3.54
SkansteRīgas FS II
15.6%Shot conversion13.8%
SkansteRīgas FS II
40%Possession44%
SkansteRīgas FS II
1.44xG for1.37
SkansteRīgas FS II
1.73xG against1.73
SkansteRīgas FS II

Shooting quality

Skanste: Counter-attackingRīgas FS II: Counter-attacking
SkansteRīgas FS II
Accuracy (shots on target)44%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Rīgas FS II is 133% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Skanste · 1.4 pts / match - Rīgas FS II

Skanste
LWLLL
Season result split
31% W8% R62% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-1-8
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-4
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
WWLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.64Opponent xG: 1.72BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%
Rīgas FS II
WWLDL
Season result split
23% W23% R54% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-3-7
0.92 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-3
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LDLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.73Opponent xG: 1.32BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Skanste is 25% better for: goals scored per match.

1.54 goals / match - Skanste · 1.23 goals / match - Rīgas FS II

Skanste scoring profile: very strong

Skanste scores in 62% of matches (8 of 13 matches), while Rīgas FS II keeps a clean sheet in 15% (2 of 13 matches).

Rīgas FS II scoring profile: very strong

Rīgas FS II scores in 62% of matches (8 of 13 matches), while Skanste keeps a clean sheet in 15% (2 of 13 matches).

20Goals scored (season)16
SkansteRīgas FS II
27Goals conceded (season)27
SkansteRīgas FS II
3.62Average goals in match3.31
SkansteRīgas FS II
5Goals scored (last 5)9
SkansteRīgas FS II
13Goals conceded (last 5)7
SkansteRīgas FS II

How often they score at least...

62%1 goal62%
SkansteRīgas FS II
31%2 goals31%
SkansteRīgas FS II
23%3 goals23%
SkansteRīgas FS II
23%4 goals8%
SkansteRīgas FS II

How often they concede at least...

85%1 goal85%
SkansteRīgas FS II
69%2 goals62%
SkansteRīgas FS II
38%3 goals38%
SkansteRīgas FS II
15%4 goals15%
SkansteRīgas FS II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

60%
League average

Goal patterns

8%BTTS at half-time15%
SkansteRīgas FS II
0%BTTS in both halves0%
SkansteRīgas FS II
8%Scored in both halves31%
SkansteRīgas FS II

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS46%
SkansteRīgas FS II
31%Min. 3 goals without BTTS23%
SkansteRīgas FS II
40%BTTS - last 560%
SkansteRīgas FS II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

77%Min. 1 goal before half-time62%
SkansteRīgas FS II
31%Min. 2 goals before half-time31%
SkansteRīgas FS II
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
SkansteRīgas FS II

2nd half

77%Min. 1 goal after half-time92%
SkansteRīgas FS II
54%Min. 2 goals after half-time85%
SkansteRīgas FS II
38%Min. 3 goals after half-time31%
SkansteRīgas FS II

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Rīgas FS II is 213% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.54 pts / match - Skanste · 1.69 pts / match - Rīgas FS II

Skanste - half-time state
8% leading31% draw62% trailing
Rīgas FS II - half-time state
38% leading54% draw8% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.54Points per match (1st half)1.69
SkansteRīgas FS II
0.15Goals scored (1st half)0.69
SkansteRīgas FS II
1Goals conceded (1st half)0.23
SkansteRīgas FS II
1.15Average goals (1st half)0.92
SkansteRīgas FS II
31%Clean sheet before half-time77%
SkansteRīgas FS II
85%No goal before half-time46%
SkansteRīgas FS II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.15Points per match (2nd half)0.85
SkansteRīgas FS II
0.92Goals scored (2nd half)0.54
SkansteRīgas FS II
1Goals conceded (2nd half)1.85
SkansteRīgas FS II
1.92Average goals (2nd half)2.38
SkansteRīgas FS II
46%Clean sheet after half-time23%
SkansteRīgas FS II
54%No goal after half-time62%
SkansteRīgas FS II

Skanste - second-half results

31% W23% R46% P
7
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.54
PPG before half-time
Lead holding388%

Leads at half-time in 8% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Rīgas FS II - second-half results

23% W15% R62% P
22
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
-17
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.69
PPG before half-time
Lead holding61%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 23%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+1.6

Concedes 1.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Skanste - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.00
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match1.41.2
Average goals in match1.62.0
1 goal100%60%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-6-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Rīgas FS II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.40
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match0.21.2
Average goals in match1.02.2
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%100%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+3-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Skanste
ScoredConceded
6
3
0-15
1
3
16-30
1
8
31-45
8
5
46-60
2
2
61-75
2
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Rīgas FS II
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
4
1
16-30
1
1
31-45
1
5
46-60
3
7
61-75
3
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.46
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+1%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
38%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
14%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Skanste

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
130%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.8
Late goals
10% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 30% come in the first quarter-hour.
10%

Rīgas FS II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.36
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.49
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
77%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
114%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.48
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).

Teams vs league

SkansteLigaRīgas FS II
Average goals in match 3.623.43 3.31
Both teams scored 46%60% 54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 69%68% 69%
Clean sheets 15%23% 15%
Goal before half-time 77%71% 62%
Goal after half-time 77%84% 92%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.43
Average goals per match
60%
Both teams scored
68%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.82
Home goals / match
1.60
Away goals / match
+14%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
64%
2 goals
35%
3 goals
14%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Skanste 0 - 0 - 2 Rīgas FS II. Average goals 3.50, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Skanstes SK
0 : 3
FK Rīgas Futbola skola II
FK Rīgas Futbola skola II
4 : 0
Skanstes SK

FAQ

What was the result of Skanste vs Rīgas FS II?

The 1. Liga match finished Skanste 4:0 Rīgas FS II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Skanste and Rīgas FS II?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Skanste won 0, Rīgas FS II won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Skanste vs Rīgas FS II?

Skanste score 1.54 goals per game on average and Rīgas FS II 1.23. The 1. Liga average is 3.43 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 68% of games. Both teams score in 46% of Skanste's matches and 54% of Rīgas FS II's.

What form are Skanste and Rīgas FS II in?

Over the last 5 games Skanste have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Rīgas FS II 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Skanste vs Rīgas FS II?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.