Skanste vs Super Nova II: match statistics
Skanste vs Super Nova II: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Skanste played against Super Nova II in 1. Liga (Latvia). The game was played on April 19, 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Skanste has 1 win, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Super Nova II has 2 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.33 points per game.
Scoring records
Skanste scores 2.33 goals per game and allows 2.33. Super Nova II scores 2.00 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 3.52 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 67% of Skanste's games and 100% of Super Nova II's. The Over 2.5 rates are 100% and 67%, compared with league averages of 61% for BTTS and 74% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Skanste has the higher season xG average, 1.05 to 0.95 per game. Skanste takes 4.3 shots per game, while Super Nova II takes 4.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Skanste leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.00 goals per game after halftime. Super Nova II leads at halftime in 67% and scores 1.33 after halftime.
When the teams score
Skanste's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (6 goals). For Super Nova II, it is minutes 46-60 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
1. Liga games average 3.52 goals. Both teams score in 61% of games, and 74% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Skanste has lost 100% of home matches and concedes an average of 2.0 goals per game, while Super Nova II are unbeaten away (0% defeats) and concede 1.0 goal per game on average. In the last 5 matches the hosts scored 13 and conceded 12, whereas the visitors have scored 3 and conceded 2, indicating Skanste’s recent games are open and high-scoring. Skanste averages 9 shots and 3 on target per home game with an 11% conversion rate, while Super Nova II average 8 shots and 2 on target with a 13% conversion, so the hosts create more opportunities but convert slightly less efficiently. The xG differential is 1.26 xG for the hosts at home versus 1.05 xG for the visitors away, yet the visitors have a higher xG against (1.9), suggesting Super Nova II concede many chances but maintain a solid points return (1.67 points per game in the last 5 vs 1.2 for Skanste). Given Skanste’s entirely negative home record and the visitors’ stable, draw-prone away performances, the most likely outcome I predict is a draw.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have BTTS 100% this season (Skanste 100% and Super Nova II 100%), which is the strongest signal that matches end with goals at both ends. In the last 5 matches BTTS is 60% for Skanste and 67% for Super Nova II, while the league average BTTS is 62%, confirming the tendency both at team and league level. Skanste averages 5.0 shots with 2.0 on target and has a 40% conversion, translating to 2.5 goals per match; Super Nova II produces 8.0 shots with 2.0 on target and a 13% conversion, yielding on average 1.0 goal, so both sides generate goal-scoring opportunities. Additionally, both teams have 0% clean sheets, and recent xG figures show Skanste with 2.06 xG per match and 2.05 xG against in the last 5, while Super Nova II has 0.95 xG per match and 1.76 xG against, indicating defensive gaps that favor goals at both ends. Based on this, I forecast BTTS - Yes as more likely with an estimated probability of 82% versus 18% for No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I forecast a strong probability for Over 1.5 (98%) because both teams have Over1.5 in 100% of their matches this season and the league averages 3.62 goals per game. Expected goals are calculated from the last 5 matches: xG Skanste = 2.06 and xG against Super Nova II = 1.76, giving Skanste an expected 1.91; xG Super Nova II = 0.95 and xG against Skanste = 2.05 give the visitors 1.50, total = 3.41 goals. Additionally, Skanste averages 5.0 shots with a 40% conversion (about 2.0 goals), while Super Nova II averages 8.0 shots with a 13% accuracy (about 1.04 goals), which confirms a greater scoring potential for the home side. For the 2.5 line I rate Over 2.5 at 74% – Skanste has Over2.5 in 100% of their last 5 matches, Super Nova II 33%, and the league shows Over2.5 in 76% of fixtures, so Over2.5 is likely. I assess Over 3.5 at around 42% (Skanste has 50% seasonally for Over3.5, Super Nova II 0%, and the expected total 3.41 is slightly below 3.5), therefore the strongest play is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Skanste led at half-time in 2 of 2 matches (leadingAtHT_home 2.0, leadingAtHTPercentage_home 100.0), averaging 1.0 goal in the first half and conceding none (scoredAVGHT_home 1.0, concededAVGHT_home 0.0). Over the season the home side average 2.5 goals scored and 1.0 conceded, while Super Nova II average 1.0 scored and 1.0 conceded (seasonScoredAVG_home 2.5, seasonConcededAVG_home 1.0; seasonScoredAVG_away 1.0, seasonConcededAVG_away 1.0). Skanste have a 100% win rate so far (winPercentage_home 100.0) versus 0% wins and 100% draws for the visitors (winPercentage_away 0.0, drawPercentage_away 100.0), which strongly supports maintaining the lead at the break and a Full-Time victory for the hosts. Although the hosts’ xG is lower (0.84 vs 1.05), the home side’s high shot conversion rate of 40.0% versus 13.0% for the visitors means Skanste convert chances into goals more often; therefore the most likely scenario is 1/1 (lead at the break and win at Full-Time by Skanste).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Skanste | Super Nova II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 25% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.24 | 0.24 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 1.75 | 2.00 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Super Nova II is 133% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - Skanste · 2.33 pts / game - Super Nova II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Skanste is 17% better for: goals scored per game.
2.33 goals / game - Skanste · 2 goals / game - Super Nova II
Super Nova II is 133% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.33 goals / game - Skanste · 1 goals / game - Super Nova II
Skanste scores in 67% of games (2 of 3 meczów), while Super Nova II keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 meczów).
Super Nova II scores in 100% of games (3 of 3 meczów), while Skanste keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Skanste
Over / Under - Super Nova II
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Super Nova II is 248% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.67 pts / game - Skanste · 2.33 pts / game - Super Nova II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Skanste - second-half results
Allows 0.7 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Super Nova II - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 67% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 1.0 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.67 | 0.33 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.3 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.7 | 1.3 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.3 |
| 1 goal | 67% | 67% |
| 2 goals | 33% | 33% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 33% |
| Clean sheet | 33% | 33% |
| No goal | 67% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.33 | 1.67 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.7 | 1.3 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.7 | 2.3 |
| 1 goal | 67% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 33% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 0% |
| No goal | 33% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Skanste
Super Nova II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Skanste | Liga | Super Nova II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 4.67 | 3.52 | ▼ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 61% | ▲ 100% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 100% | 74% | ▼ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 24% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 78% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 78% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of Skanste vs Super Nova II?
The 1. Liga match finished Skanste 1:1 Super Nova II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Skanste vs Super Nova II?
Skanste score 2.33 goals per game on average and Super Nova II 2.00. The 1. Liga average is 3.52 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 74% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Skanste's matches and 100% of Super Nova II's.
What form are Skanste and Super Nova II in?
Over the last 5 games Skanste have a 1-0-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Super Nova II 2-1-0 (2.33 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Skanste vs Super Nova II?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Skanste vs Super Nova II: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.