Slatina vs Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ: match statistics
Slatina displays significantly better form and home statistics, sitting 14th in the table with a +2 goal difference at their own stadium. The hosts have won 30% of their home matches with 40% clean sheets, indicating a solid defense. Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ finds itself in last place (18th) with disastrous form—five consecutive defeats and a -16 goal difference in away matches. The visitors concede an average of 2.2 goals away while scoring just 0.6, and their xG ratio (1.18 to 2.12) confirms massive offensive and defensive issues. Possession statistics (51% vs 44%) and shot conversion (9% vs 6%) also favor Slatina. Considering all factors, especially the visitors' catastrophic streak and the hosts' advantage in key metrics, a Slatina victory seems the most probable scenario.
Slatina vs Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Slatina played against Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ in Liga II (Romania). The game was played on March 7, 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Slatina has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ has 0 wins, 0 draws and 5 losses, with 0.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Slatina scores 1.21 goals per game and allows 1.26. Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ scores 0.95 and allows 2.05. Games in this league average 2.65 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 58% of Slatina's games and 37% of Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ's. The Over 2.5 rates are 42% and 53%, compared with league averages of 48% for BTTS and 49% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Slatina has the higher season xG average, 1.55 to 1.30 per game. Slatina takes 12.7 shots per game, while Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ takes 10.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Slatina leads at halftime in 26% of its games and scores 0.79 goals per game after halftime. Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ leads at halftime in 21% and scores 0.63 after halftime.
When the teams score
Slatina's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). For Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ, it is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Liga II games average 2.65 goals. Both teams score in 48% of games, and 49% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Slatina displays significantly better form and home statistics, sitting 14th in the table with a +2 goal difference at their own stadium. The hosts have won 30% of their home matches with 40% clean sheets, indicating a solid defense. Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ finds itself in last place (18th) with disastrous form—five consecutive defeats and a -16 goal difference in away matches. The visitors concede an average of 2.2 goals away while scoring just 0.6, and their xG ratio (1.18 to 2.12) confirms massive offensive and defensive issues. Possession statistics (51% vs 44%) and shot conversion (9% vs 6%) also favor Slatina. Considering all factors, especially the visitors' catastrophic streak and the hosts' advantage in key metrics, a Slatina victory seems the most probable scenario.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Slatina | Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Slatina is 27% better for: goals scored per game.
1.21 goals / game - Slatina · 0.95 goals / game - Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ
Slatina is 63% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.26 goals / game - Slatina · 2.05 goals / game - Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ
Slatina scores in 68% of games (13 of 19 meczów), while Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ keeps a clean sheet in 32% (6 of 19 meczów).
Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ scores in 63% of games (12 of 19 meczów), while Slatina keeps a clean sheet in 21% (4 of 19 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Slatina
Over / Under - Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Slatina is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.11 pts / game - Slatina · 0.95 pts / game - Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Slatina - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 26% of games and wins 32%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 26%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 100% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.20 | 0.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 0% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -8 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Slatina
Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga II).
Teams vs league
| Slatina | Liga | Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.47 | 2.65 | ▲ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 58% | 48% | ▼ 37% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 42% | 49% | ▲ 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 21% | 30% | ▲ 32% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 79% | 72% | ▲ 74% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 84% | 81% | ▲ 95% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Ceahlăul Piatra NeamţGoalAndrei Ovidiu Marc
FAQ
What was the result of Slatina vs Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ?
The Liga II match finished Slatina 2:1 Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Slatina vs Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ?
Slatina score 1.21 goals per game on average and Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ 0.95. The Liga II average is 2.65 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Slatina's matches and 37% of Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ's.
What form are Slatina and Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ in?
Over the last 5 games Slatina have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Slatina vs Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Slatina vs Ceahlăul Piatra Neamţ: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.