Slatina vs CSM Satu Mare: match statistics
Slatina vs CSM Satu Mare: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Slatina played against CSM Satu Mare in Liga II (Romania). The game was played on December 6, 2025. Final score: 3:1.
Recent form
Slatina has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. CSM Satu Mare has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses, with 0.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Slatina scores 1.13 goals per game and allows 1.33. CSM Satu Mare scores 0.73 and allows 2.27. Games in this league average 2.63 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 53% of Slatina's games and 47% of CSM Satu Mare's. The Over 2.5 rates are 33% and 53%, compared with league averages of 48% for BTTS and 48% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Slatina has the higher season xG average, 1.47 to 1.19 per game. Slatina takes 11.2 shots per game, while CSM Satu Mare takes 9.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Slatina leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.73 goals per game after halftime. CSM Satu Mare leads at halftime in 0% and scores 0.53 after halftime.
When the teams score
Slatina's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). For CSM Satu Mare, it is minutes 46-60 (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Liga II games average 2.63 goals. Both teams score in 48% of games, and 48% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Slatina | CSM Satu Mare | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 27% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Slatina is 33% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - Slatina · 0.6 pts / game - CSM Satu Mare
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Slatina is 55% better for: goals scored per game.
1.13 goals / game - Slatina · 0.73 goals / game - CSM Satu Mare
Slatina is 71% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.33 goals / game - Slatina · 2.27 goals / game - CSM Satu Mare
Slatina scores in 67% of games (10 of 15 meczów), while CSM Satu Mare keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 15 meczów).
CSM Satu Mare scores in 60% of games (9 of 15 meczów), while Slatina keeps a clean sheet in 20% (3 of 15 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Slatina
Over / Under - CSM Satu Mare
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Slatina is 126% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.2 pts / game - Slatina · 0.53 pts / game - CSM Satu Mare
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Slatina - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 27%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
CSM Satu Mare - second-half results
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.00 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -7 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -5 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Slatina
CSM Satu Mare
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga II).
Teams vs league
| Slatina | Liga | CSM Satu Mare | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.47 | 2.63 | ▲ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 53% | 48% | • 47% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 33% | 48% | ▲ 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 31% | ▼ 13% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 80% | 73% | ▼ 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 87% | 80% | ▲ 87% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
FAQ
What was the result of Slatina vs CSM Satu Mare?
The Liga II match finished Slatina 3:1 CSM Satu Mare. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Slatina vs CSM Satu Mare?
Slatina score 1.13 goals per game on average and CSM Satu Mare 0.73. The Liga II average is 2.63 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Slatina's matches and 47% of CSM Satu Mare's.
What form are Slatina and CSM Satu Mare in?
Over the last 5 games Slatina have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and CSM Satu Mare 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Slatina vs CSM Satu Mare?
The statistical background for Slatina vs CSM Satu Mare — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.