Smiltene vs Metta - LU: match statistics
Smiltene vs Metta - LU: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Smiltene played against Metta - LU in 1. Liga (Latvia). The game was played on August 29, 2026. Venue: Tepera stadions. Final score: 0:6.
Recent form
Smiltene has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Metta - LU has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Smiltene scores 1.24 goals per game and allows 2.76. Metta - LU scores 4.18 and allows 0.82. Games in this league average 3.57 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 59% of Smiltene's games and 53% of Metta - LU's. The Over 2.5 rates are 65% and 82%, compared with league averages of 65% for BTTS and 69% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Metta - LU has the higher season xG average, 3.01 to 1.22 per game. Smiltene takes 8.9 shots per game, while Metta - LU takes 20.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Smiltene leads at halftime in 12% of its games and scores 0.82 goals per game after halftime. Metta - LU leads at halftime in 76% and scores 1.76 after halftime.
When the teams score
Smiltene's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). For Metta - LU, it is minutes 31-45+ (18 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
1. Liga games average 3.57 goals. Both teams score in 65% of games, and 69% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 8.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Metta - LU are top of the table with a record of 14 wins, 2 draws and just 1 defeat, while Smiltene sit 13th and have won only 2 of their 17 matches. Away from home, the visitors average 2.5 goals per game, create chances worth 2.46 xG and remain unbeaten in this role, whereas Smiltene concede as many as 2.63 goals per home match. Metta’s superiority is also evident in their control of the game: they average 61% possession, 19.33 shots and 8 shots on target per match, compared with the hosts’ 46% possession and 9.75 shots. The visitors’ defense allows opponents just 0.89 xG and concedes an average of 0.75 goals away from home, while Smiltene record only 1.38 xG at home and fail to score in 25% of such matches. Despite Smiltene’s two wins in their last five games, the 14 goals they conceded during that period and Metta’s 26 goals over the same span clearly point towards an away victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS pick is supported by Smiltene’s very strong current momentum: in their last 5 matches, the team scored an average of 1.8 goals but conceded as many as 2.8, with both teams scoring in 80% of those fixtures. Metta - LU scored an impressive 5.2 goals per match during this period, with an xG of 3.74, so their chances of exploiting the hosts’ defensive problems are high. Smiltene have not finished a single match this season without scoring, while at home they average 3.38 xG and 15.44 shots on target, which should be enough even against a visiting side that has kept a clean sheet in 50% of its matches. The seasonal BTTS rates stand at 56% for the hosts and 50% for Metta, but recent form and the league average of 64% clearly strengthen the scenario of both teams scoring.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The match profile clearly favors goals: Over 1.5 goals landed in 100% of Smiltene’s matches and 88% of Metta’s, while the league average stands at a high 3.59 goals. In their last five matches, Metta averaged 5.2 goals scored with an xG of 3.74, while Smiltene conceded an average of 2.8 goals and allowed opponents an xG of 1.82. The home side also has a solid chance of finding the net, having scored 9 goals in their last five appearances, while both teams scored in 80% and 60% of their respective recent matches. Over 1.5 goals is the strongest pick, as just two goals would still be well below the projected total of 3.80 and the teams’ seasonal profile.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal comes from Metta’s current form – LU: over their last five matches, they have averaged 5.2 goals scored and 1.4 conceded, winning 60% of their games, while Smiltene have lost 3 of their last 5 matches and conceded an average of 2.8 goals. The visitors start matches particularly strongly, scoring an average of 3.0 goals before half-time in this sample and leading at the break in 40% of games, whereas the hosts conceded 1.8 goals before half-time over the same period and were behind at the break in 60% of cases. Metta’s advantage should persist after the interval: their recent second-half average stands at 2.2 goals scored, and they won this period in 80% of their last five appearances. Smiltene do have very strong season-long home figures, with a lead at the break in 89% of matches and an average of 5.67 goals per game, but their recent form clearly contradicts these numbers. Therefore, the most likely HT/FT outcome is a 1/1 result, with the visitors leading at half-time and securing the win at full-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Smiltene | Metta - LU | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 47% | 53% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Metta - LU is 117% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - Smiltene · 2.6 pts / game - Metta - LU
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Metta - LU is 237% better for: goals scored per game.
1.24 goals / game - Smiltene · 4.18 goals / game - Metta - LU
Metta - LU is 237% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.76 goals / game - Smiltene · 0.82 goals / game - Metta - LU
Smiltene scores in 65% of games (11 of 17 meczów), while Metta - LU keeps a clean sheet in 47% (8 of 17 meczów).
Metta - LU scores in 100% of games (17 of 17 meczów), while Smiltene keeps a clean sheet in 12% (2 of 17 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Smiltene
Over / Under - Metta - LU
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Metta - LU is 280% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.65 pts / game - Smiltene · 2.47 pts / game - Metta - LU
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Smiltene - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 12% of games and wins 12%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Metta - LU - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 76% of games and wins 82%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 2.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 3.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 3.2 | 2.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 3.6 | 2.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 80% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +14 | +12 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (18 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Smiltene
Metta - LU
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Smiltene | Liga | Metta - LU | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 4.00 | 3.57 | ▲ 5.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 59% | 65% | ▼ 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 65% | 69% | ▲ 82% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 12% | 20% | ▲ 47% |
| Goal before half-time | • 76% | 76% | ▲ 82% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 88% | 84% | ▲ 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Smiltene's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Metta - LU. Games average 8.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Smiltene vs Metta - LU?
The 1. Liga match finished Smiltene 0:6 Metta - LU. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Smiltene vs Metta - LU?
Smiltene score 1.24 goals per game on average and Metta - LU 4.18. The 1. Liga average is 3.57 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 69% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Smiltene's matches and 53% of Metta - LU's.
What form are Smiltene and Metta - LU in?
Over the last 5 games Smiltene have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Metta - LU 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Smiltene vs Metta - LU?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


