Egypt - Egyptian Premier LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Smouha SC vs Ceramica Cleopatra: match statistics

Smouha SC crest
Smouha SC
0 : 2half-time 0:1
Ceramica Cleopatra crest
Ceramica Cleopatra

Smouha SC vs Ceramica Cleopatra: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Smouha SC play Ceramica Cleopatra in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The match date is 22 April 2026 at 20:00. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Smouha SC: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match. Ceramica Cleopatra: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Smouha SC scores 0.88 and concedes 0.88 goals per match. Ceramica Cleopatra scores 1.31 and concedes 0.81. League average: 2.02 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Smouha SC 38%, Ceramica Cleopatra 42%. Over 2.5: Smouha SC 27%, Ceramica Cleopatra 23%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 34%.

xG, shots and style

Smouha SC has higher xG: 1.25 vs 1.19. Smouha SC: 10.5 shots per match, Ceramica Cleopatra: 9.8.

Match halves

Smouha SC: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.35. Ceramica Cleopatra: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.77.

Goals by minute

Smouha SC: 31-45+ (6 goals). Ceramica Cleopatra: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Egyptian Premier League: 2.02 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 34%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Smouha has a clear advantage in chance creation at home: average xG is 1.42 versus 1.08 xG for Ceramica away, and the hosts average 12.27 shots (4.0 on target) per match versus 8.73 (3.36 on target) for the visitors. Defensively Smouha is slightly more stable at home — conceding just 0.64 goals per match, compared to 0.73 conceded by Ceramica away, and keeping a clean sheet in 45% of home games. On the other hand Ceramica has the better season record (11 wins and 31 goals versus 8 wins and 22 goals for Smouha) and higher possession on the road (56% vs 51%), and in their last 5 matches the visitors have recorded 5 draws. In last-5 form Smouha scored 7 goals and averages 1.2 points per match, while Ceramica scored 5 goals and averages 1.0 points per match, which suggests greater offensive vitality from the hosts despite lower efficiency (9% conversion vs 13% for Ceramica). Considering Smouha’s superior xG and greater chance volume plus their solid home defense, I give a slight edge to the hosts, but expect an even match with a moderate risk of a draw.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

51Possession (%)49
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
11Shots9
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
4Shots on target3
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
1.28xG1.09
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
8Corners3
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
42Dangerous attacks43
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
13Fouls15
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
3Cards2
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0.88Goals scored / match1.31
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0.88Goals conceded / match0.81
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
46%Average possession57%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
3.46Shots on target / match3.81
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.5Shots per match9.81
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
3.46Shots on target3.81
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
8.4%Shot conversion13.3%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
46%Possession57%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
1.25xG for1.19
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
1.23xG against1.24
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra

Shooting quality

Smouha SC: BalancedCeramica Cleopatra: Efficient finishing
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
Accuracy (shots on target)33%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.250.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Smouha SC
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
31% W27% R42% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-7-11
1.19 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-3-6
Last 5 at home
1-0-4
WLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.15Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Ceramica Cleopatra
DWLDL
Season result split
46% W31% R23% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-8-6
1.69 pts / match · goal difference +13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-4-4
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LDDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.06Opponent xG: 1.18BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ceramica Cleopatra is 49% better for: goals scored per match.

0.88 goals / match - Smouha SC · 1.31 goals / match - Ceramica Cleopatra

Ceramica Cleopatra is 9% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.88 goals / match - Smouha SC · 0.81 goals / match - Ceramica Cleopatra

Smouha SC scoring profile: mixed

Smouha SC scores in 54% of matches (14 of 26 matches), while Ceramica Cleopatra keeps a clean sheet in 38% (10 of 26 matches).

Ceramica Cleopatra scoring profile: very strong

Ceramica Cleopatra scores in 77% of matches (20 of 26 matches), while Smouha SC keeps a clean sheet in 27% (7 of 26 matches).

23Goals scored (season)34
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
23Goals conceded (season)21
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
1.77Average goals in match2.12
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
2Goals scored (last 5)4
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
8Goals conceded (last 5)4
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra

How often they score at least...

54%1 goal77%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
27%2 goals42%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
8%3 goals12%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0%4 goals0%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal62%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
15%2 goals15%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0%3 goals4%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0%4 goals0%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

42%
Ceramica Cleopatra - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.11 of 26 matches
47%
League average

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time15%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0%BTTS in both halves8%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
23%Scored in both halves23%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra

BTTS and goal count

23%Min. 3 goals and BTTS19%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
40%BTTS - last 540%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

58%Min. 1 goal before half-time58%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
31%Min. 2 goals before half-time19%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
4%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra

2nd half

69%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
15%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time4%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ceramica Cleopatra is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.35 pts / match - Smouha SC · 1.5 pts / match - Ceramica Cleopatra

Smouha SC - half-time state
23% leading65% draw12% trailing
Ceramica Cleopatra - half-time state
35% leading46% draw19% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.35Points per match (1st half)1.5
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0.54Goals scored (1st half)0.54
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0.38Goals conceded (1st half)0.35
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0.92Average goals (1st half)0.88
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
62%Clean sheet before half-time69%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
54%No goal before half-time58%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra

After half-time (2nd half)

1.08Points per match (2nd half)1.62
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0.35Goals scored (2nd half)0.77
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.46
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0.85Average goals (2nd half)1.23
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
54%Clean sheet after half-time58%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
69%No goal after half-time42%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra

Smouha SC - second-half results

23% W38% R38% P
35
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.35
PPG before half-time
Lead holding135%

Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Ceramica Cleopatra - second-half results

42% W35% R23% P
39
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding131%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Smouha SC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.20
Goals scored / match0.40.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.20.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal60%100%
Goal difference-2-4
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
Ceramica Cleopatra - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.00
Goals scored / match0.60.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.00.6
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Smouha SC
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
4
6
16-30
6
2
31-45
5
3
46-60
1
4
61-75
3
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Ceramica Cleopatra
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
5
3
16-30
6
4
31-45
6
3
46-60
5
2
61-75
9
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.94
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
40%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-49%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
42%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Smouha SC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.37
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-1.19
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

Ceramica Cleopatra

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.55
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.43
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
134%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
78%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.69
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).

Teams vs league

Smouha SCLigaCeramica Cleopatra
Average goals in match 1.772.02 2.12
Both teams scored 38%47% 42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 27%34% 23%
Clean sheets 27%35% 38%
Goal before half-time 58%58% 58%
Goal after half-time 69%70% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.02
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
35%
Clean sheets
1.04
Home goals / match
0.98
Away goals / match
+6%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
58%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Smouha SC 0 - 0 - 1 Ceramica Cleopatra. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Ceramica Cleopatra
1 : 0
Smouha SC

FAQ

What was the result of Smouha SC vs Ceramica Cleopatra?

The Egyptian Premier League match finished Smouha SC 0:2 Ceramica Cleopatra. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Smouha SC vs Ceramica Cleopatra?

Smouha SC score 0.88 goals per game on average and Ceramica Cleopatra 1.31. The Egyptian Premier League average is 2.02 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Smouha SC's matches and 42% of Ceramica Cleopatra's.

What form are Smouha SC and Ceramica Cleopatra in?

Over the last 5 games Smouha SC have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Ceramica Cleopatra 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Smouha SC vs Ceramica Cleopatra?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.