Egypt - Egyptian Premier LeagueData current as of September 13, 2026

Smouha SC vs Ceramica Cleopatra: match statistics

Smouha SC crest
Smouha SC
0 : 2half-time 0:1
Ceramica Cleopatra crest
Ceramica Cleopatra

Smouha SC vs Ceramica Cleopatra: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Smouha SC played against Ceramica Cleopatra in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The game was played on April 22, 2026. Final score: 0:2.

Recent form

Smouha SC has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Ceramica Cleopatra has 0 wins, 5 draws and 0 losses, with 1.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Smouha SC scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 0.77. Ceramica Cleopatra scores 1.41 and allows 0.82. Games in this league average 2.00 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 41% of Smouha SC's games and 45% of Ceramica Cleopatra's. The Over 2.5 rates are 27% and 27%, compared with league averages of 47% for BTTS and 33% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Smouha SC has the higher season xG average, 1.27 to 1.22 per game. Smouha SC takes 10.7 shots per game, while Ceramica Cleopatra takes 10.1.

First-half and second-half trends

Smouha SC leads at halftime in 27% of its games and scores 0.41 goals per game after halftime. Ceramica Cleopatra leads at halftime in 36% and scores 0.86 after halftime.

When the teams score

Smouha SC's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (5 goals). For Ceramica Cleopatra, it is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Egyptian Premier League games average 2.00 goals. Both teams score in 47% of games, and 33% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Smouha has a clear advantage in chance creation at home: average xG is 1.42 versus 1.08 xG for Ceramica away, and the hosts average 12.27 shots (4.0 on target) per match versus 8.73 (3.36 on target) for the visitors. Defensively Smouha is slightly more stable at home — conceding just 0.64 goals per match, compared to 0.73 conceded by Ceramica away, and keeping a clean sheet in 45% of home games. On the other hand Ceramica has the better season record (11 wins and 31 goals versus 8 wins and 22 goals for Smouha) and higher possession on the road (56% vs 51%), and in their last 5 matches the visitors have recorded 5 draws. In last-5 form Smouha scored 7 goals and averages 1.2 points per match, while Ceramica scored 5 goals and averages 1.0 points per match, which suggests greater offensive vitality from the hosts despite lower efficiency (9% conversion vs 13% for Ceramica). Considering Smouha’s superior xG and greater chance volume plus their solid home defense, I give a slight edge to the hosts, but expect an even match with a moderate risk of a draw.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Signals favor BTTS - Yes: Smouha scores on average 1.73 goals per match (xG 1.33) and has a home BTTS rate of 55%, while Ceramica registered BTTS in 80% of their last 5 matches, averaging 1.0 scored and 1.0 conceded in that period. xG metrics indicate Smouha has xG 1.33 versus Ceramica’s expected 1.30, and the visitors have xG 1.08 versus 1.25 xG expected for Smouha, suggesting realistic, though asymmetric, scoring chances for both sides. Smouha averages 11.45 shots and 4.27 on target versus Ceramica’s 8.73 and 3.36, and with conversion rates of 15% vs 13% the hosts have an advantage in chance creation. Counterargument: Ceramica have 45% clean sheets away and a season BTTS for the visitors of 36%, versus the league average BTTS 47%, so no-goal outcomes are possible. Overall, considering the strong 80% BTTS signal for the visitors in the last 5 matches, the season 55% for Smouha, and the hosts’ edge in shots and xG, I assess BTTS probability at 62% vs 38% for No Goal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

xG-based estimates: home xG is 1.33 and xG against Ceramica is 1.30, yielding about 1.32 goals for Smouha; away xG is 1.08 versus xG against Smouha 1.25, yielding about 1.17 goals for Ceramica, for a total of 2.49 expected goals. Historical rates support this projection — Smouha has 91% of matches with over 1.5 goals at home, Ceramica 55%, giving an average signal of ~73% for Over 1.5. A Poisson model with λ=2.49 gives ~71% probability for Over 1.5 and ~46% for Over 2.5, therefore the strongest and safest option is Over 1.5. Additionally, Smouha averages 1.73 goals and 4.27 shots on target per match, while Ceramica’s season average for goals conceded is 0.73 but a higher xG against of 1.30 — these figures reinforce the scenario of at least two goals in the match. Consequently, I recommend an Over 1.5 bet based on xG 1.32/1.17 and seasonal percentages 91%/55%.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

I back 1/1 (Smouha leading at the break and winning) because the hosts have a clear offensive advantage: Smouha’s season goals per game 1.73 vs Ceramica 1.09, xG 1.33 vs 1.08, more shots 11.45 vs 8.73 and more shots on target 4.27 vs 3.36. At halftime Smouha led in 5 matches (45%) versus only 3 away leads (27%), and the average halftime goals are 0.64 vs 0.45 in favor of the hosts, boosting the probability of an HT lead. Smouha wins 64% of matches this season, Ceramica 36%, and in the last 5 fixtures the hosts have 2 wins (LWWLL) while the visitors recorded 5 draws (DDDDD), so maintaining and closing out a win is more likely. Additionally the hosts are stronger after the break: stats show Smouha averages 1.09 second-half goals vs Ceramica’s 0.64 and higher total second-half values 1.64 vs 1.09, which reduces the risk of surrendering the lead; although the visitors have a halftime clean sheet in 82% of cases, this more often translates into draws than full-time wins. Based on this the overall predicted chance of a home win is approximately 53%, draw 26% and loss 21%, hence 1/1 is the strongest signal.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

51Possession (%)49
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
11Shots9
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
4Shots on target3
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
1.28xG1.09
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
8Corners3
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
42Dangerous attacks43
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
13Fouls15
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
3Cards2
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
1Goals scored / game1.41
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0.77Goals allowed / game0.82
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
46%Average possession58%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
3.55Shots on target / game3.82
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10.68Shots per game10.09
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
3.55Shots on target3.82
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
9.4%Shot conversion14%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
46%Possession58%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
1.27xG for1.22
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
1.21xG against1.27
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra

Shooting quality

Smouha SC: BalancedCeramica Cleopatra: Efficient finishing
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
Accuracy (shots on target)33%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Smouha SC is 20% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / game - Smouha SC · 1 pts / game - Ceramica Cleopatra

Smouha SC
LWWLL
Season result split
36% W32% D32% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-7-7
1.41 pts / game · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-3-3
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WWLWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.28Opponent xG: 1.43BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Ceramica Cleopatra
DDDDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
50% W32% D18% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-7-4
1.82 pts / game · goal difference +13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-5-0
1.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
4-4-3
Last 5 away
1-2-2
WLLDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.17Opponent xG: 1.36BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ceramica Cleopatra is 41% better for: goals scored per game.

1 goals / game - Smouha SC · 1.41 goals / game - Ceramica Cleopatra

Smouha SC is 6% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.77 goals / game - Smouha SC · 0.82 goals / game - Ceramica Cleopatra

Smouha SC scoring profile: mixed

Smouha SC scores in 59% of games (13 of 22 meczów), while Ceramica Cleopatra keeps a clean sheet in 41% (9 of 22 meczów).

Ceramica Cleopatra scoring profile: very strong

Ceramica Cleopatra scores in 82% of games (18 of 22 meczów), while Smouha SC keeps a clean sheet in 32% (7 of 22 meczów).

22Goals scored (season)31
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
17Goals conceded (season)18
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
1.77Average goals per game2.23
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
7Goals scored (last 5)6
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
6Goals conceded (last 5)6
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra

How often they score at least...

59%1 goal82%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
32%2 goals45%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
9%3 goals14%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0%4 goals0%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra

How often they concede at least...

68%1 goal59%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
9%2 goals18%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0%3 goals5%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0%4 goals0%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

45%
Ceramica Cleopatra - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.10 of 22 meczów
47%
League average

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time14%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0%BTTS in both halves9%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
27%Scored in both halves23%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra

BTTS and goal count

23%Min. 3 goals and BTTS23%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
40%BTTS - last 5100%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

55%Min. 1 goal before half-time55%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
32%Min. 2 goals before half-time18%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra

2nd half

68%Min. 1 goal after half-time86%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
18%Min. 2 goals after half-time45%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time5%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Smouha SC - half-time state
27% leading68% draw5% trailing
Ceramica Cleopatra - half-time state
36% leading45% draw18% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per game (1st half)1.55
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0.59Goals scored (1st half)0.55
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0.32Goals conceded (1st half)0.32
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0.91Average goals (1st half)0.86
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
68%Clean sheet before half-time73%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
50%No goal before half-time59%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra

After half-time (2nd half)

1.23Points per game (2nd half)1.68
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0.41Goals scored (2nd half)0.86
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0.45Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0.86Average goals (2nd half)1.36
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
59%Clean sheet after half-time55%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
64%No goal after half-time36%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra

Smouha SC - second-half results

27% W41% D32% L
33
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 36%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Ceramica Cleopatra - second-half results

45% W32% D23% L
34
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.55
PPG before half-time
Lead holding139%

Leads at halftime in 36% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Smouha SC - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.40
Goals scored / game1.00.4
Goals allowed / game0.60.6
Average goals per game1.61.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+2-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
Ceramica Cleopatra - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.000.80
Goals scored / game0.60.6
Goals allowed / game0.21.0
Average goals per game0.81.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%0%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+2-2
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Smouha SC
ScoredConceded
4
0
0-15
4
5
16-30
5
2
31-45
5
3
46-60
1
2
61-75
3
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Ceramica Cleopatra
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
4
3
16-30
6
3
31-45
6
3
46-60
5
1
61-75
8
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.00
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
0.9 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
43%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-50%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Smouha SC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.44
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
95%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
81%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.21
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Ceramica Cleopatra

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.64
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.45
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
148%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
78%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.82
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).

Teams vs league

Smouha SCLigaCeramica Cleopatra
Average goals per game 1.772.00 2.23
Both teams scored 41%47% 45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 27%33% 27%
Clean sheets 32%35% 41%
Goal before half-time 55%57% 55%
Goal after half-time 68%69% 86%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.00
Average goals per game
47%
Both teams scored
33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
35%
Clean sheets
1.05
Home goals / game
0.95
Away goals / game
+11%
Home attack advantage
+10%
Home defensive advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
20%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Ceramica CleopatraGoalSodiq Ougola
  2. Smouha SCSubstitutionOn: Abdel Rahman AmerOff: Amr El Sisi
  3. Ceramica CleopatraYellow cardIbrahim Ali Mohamed
  4. Smouha SCYellow cardSamadou Attidjikou
  5. Smouha SCSubstitutionOn: Abdel Kader YehiaOff: Samir Fekri Mohamed Ahmed
  6. Ceramica CleopatraYellow cardJustice Arthur
  7. Ceramica CleopatraSubstitutionOn: Ahmed Hany EbadahOff: Mohamed Abdallah Ali
  8. Smouha SCYellow cardSamuel Amadi
  9. Ceramica CleopatraGoalAyman SaadAssist: Fagrie Lakay
  10. Smouha SCYellow cardEmad Fathy

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Mohamed MaaroufMatches officiated: 18
3.83Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 250%Home wins17%Draws33%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from Smouha SC's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Ceramica Cleopatra. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

Ceramica Cleopatra
1 : 0
Smouha SC

FAQ

What was the result of Smouha SC vs Ceramica Cleopatra?

The Egyptian Premier League match finished Smouha SC 0:2 Ceramica Cleopatra. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Smouha SC vs Ceramica Cleopatra?

Smouha SC score 1.00 goals per game on average and Ceramica Cleopatra 1.41. The Egyptian Premier League average is 2.00 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 33% of games. Both teams score in 41% of Smouha SC's matches and 45% of Ceramica Cleopatra's.

What form are Smouha SC and Ceramica Cleopatra in?

Over the last 5 games Smouha SC have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Ceramica Cleopatra 0-5-0 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Smouha SC vs Ceramica Cleopatra?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.