Smouha SC vs Pharco: match statistics
Smouha SC displays significantly better home form with 33% wins and an impressive 50% clean sheets at home, confirming defensive solidity (averaging 0.5 goals conceded per match). The hosts clearly dominate in chance creation, achieving an average of 3.83 shots on target and an xG of 1.5 in home matches. Pharco shows very poor away form with only 17% wins, conceding an average of 1.5 goals per match alongside low offensive efficiency (0.67 goals and xG 0.69). The visitors' form in the last five matches is alarming—only one win with four losses and a PPG of 0.6. Smouha's positive home goal difference (+2) contrasted with Pharco's negative away balance (-5), plus an advantage in possession (53% vs 39%), point to a clear advantage for the hosts, although their moderate scoring efficiency could lead to a low-scoring result or a draw.
Smouha SC vs Pharco: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Smouha SC played against Pharco in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The game was played on January 21, 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Recent form
Smouha SC has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Pharco has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Smouha SC scores 0.75 goals per game and allows 0.58. Pharco scores 0.38 and allows 0.92. Games in this league average 1.91 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 42% of Smouha SC's games and 23% of Pharco's. The Over 2.5 rates are 8% and 8%, compared with league averages of 43% for BTTS and 34% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Smouha SC has the higher season xG average, 1.34 to 0.90 per game. Smouha SC takes 11.8 shots per game, while Pharco takes 7.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Smouha SC leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 0.33 goals per game after halftime. Pharco leads at halftime in 15% and scores 0.23 after halftime.
When the teams score
Smouha SC's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (3 goals). For Pharco, it is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Egyptian Premier League games average 1.91 goals. Both teams score in 43% of games, and 34% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Smouha SC displays significantly better home form with 33% wins and an impressive 50% clean sheets at home, confirming defensive solidity (averaging 0.5 goals conceded per match). The hosts clearly dominate in chance creation, achieving an average of 3.83 shots on target and an xG of 1.5 in home matches. Pharco shows very poor away form with only 17% wins, conceding an average of 1.5 goals per match alongside low offensive efficiency (0.67 goals and xG 0.69). The visitors' form in the last five matches is alarming—only one win with four losses and a PPG of 0.6. Smouha's positive home goal difference (+2) contrasted with Pharco's negative away balance (-5), plus an advantage in possession (53% vs 39%), point to a clear advantage for the hosts, although their moderate scoring efficiency could lead to a low-scoring result or a draw.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Smouha SC | Pharco | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 29% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.22 | 0.16 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Pharco is 17% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - Smouha SC · 1.4 pts / game - Pharco
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Smouha SC is 97% better for: goals scored per game.
0.75 goals / game - Smouha SC · 0.38 goals / game - Pharco
Smouha SC is 59% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.58 goals / game - Smouha SC · 0.92 goals / game - Pharco
Smouha SC scores in 58% of games (7 of 12 meczów), while Pharco keeps a clean sheet in 46% (6 of 13 meczów).
Pharco scores in 38% of games (5 of 13 meczów), while Smouha SC keeps a clean sheet in 42% (5 of 12 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Smouha SC
Over / Under - Pharco
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Smouha SC is 39% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / game - Smouha SC · 1.08 pts / game - Pharco
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Smouha SC - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Pharco - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 15% of games and wins 15%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 100% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Smouha SC
Pharco
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Smouha SC | Liga | Pharco | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.33 | 1.91 | ▼ 1.31 |
| Both teams scored | • 42% | 43% | ▼ 23% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 8% | 34% | ▼ 8% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 42% | 38% | ▲ 46% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 42% | 55% | ▼ 38% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 50% | 68% | ▼ 54% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Smouha SC vs Pharco?
The Egyptian Premier League match finished Smouha SC 2:0 Pharco. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Smouha SC vs Pharco?
Smouha SC score 0.75 goals per game on average and Pharco 0.38. The Egyptian Premier League average is 1.91 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Smouha SC's matches and 23% of Pharco's.
What form are Smouha SC and Pharco in?
Over the last 5 games Smouha SC have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Pharco 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Smouha SC vs Pharco?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.