Sofapaka vs Tusker: match statistics
Sofapaka vs Tusker: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Sofapaka played against Tusker in Kenyan Premier League (Kenya). The game was played on December 11, 2025. Final score: 0:2.
Recent form
Sofapaka has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Tusker has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Sofapaka scores 0.92 goals per game and allows 1.17. Tusker scores 0.83 and allows 0.83. Games in this league average 1.94 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 33% of Sofapaka's games and 42% of Tusker's. The Over 2.5 rates are 33% and 25%, compared with league averages of 40% for BTTS and 30% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Tusker has the higher season xG average, 1.60 to 1.45 per game. Sofapaka takes 10.2 shots per game, while Tusker takes 12.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Sofapaka leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 0.42 goals per game after halftime. Tusker leads at halftime in 25% and scores 0.42 after halftime.
When the teams score
Sofapaka's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (3 goals). For Tusker, it is minutes 76-90+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Kenyan Premier League games average 1.94 goals. Both teams score in 40% of games, and 30% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Sofapaka | Tusker | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.24 | 0.19 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Tusker is 125% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - Sofapaka · 1.8 pts / game - Tusker
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sofapaka is 11% better for: goals scored per game.
0.92 goals / game - Sofapaka · 0.83 goals / game - Tusker
Tusker is 41% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.17 goals / game - Sofapaka · 0.83 goals / game - Tusker
Sofapaka scores in 50% of games (6 of 12 games), while Tusker keeps a clean sheet in 42% (5 of 12 games).
Tusker scores in 75% of games (9 of 12 games), while Sofapaka keeps a clean sheet in 25% (3 of 12 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Sofapaka
Over / Under - Tusker
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Sofapaka is 16% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.25 pts / game - Sofapaka · 1.08 pts / game - Tusker
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Sofapaka - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Tusker - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 42%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 20% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 100% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Sofapaka
Tusker
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kenyan Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Sofapaka | Liga | Tusker | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.08 | 1.94 | ▼ 1.67 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 40% | ▲ 42% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 33% | 30% | ▼ 25% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 25% | 38% | ▲ 42% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 58% | 38% | ▲ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 50% | 41% | • 42% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of Sofapaka vs Tusker?
The Kenyan Premier League match finished Sofapaka 0:2 Tusker. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Sofapaka vs Tusker?
Sofapaka score 0.92 goals per game on average and Tusker 0.83. The Kenyan Premier League average is 1.94 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 30% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Sofapaka's matches and 42% of Tusker's.
What form are Sofapaka and Tusker in?
Over the last 5 games Sofapaka have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Tusker 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sofapaka vs Tusker?
The statistical background for Sofapaka vs Tusker — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.