Sogndal vs Åsane: match statistics
Sogndal vs Åsane: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Sogndal played against Åsane in First Division (Norway). The game was played on April 25, 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Recent form
Sogndal has 0 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.00 points per game. Åsane has 0 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 0.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Sogndal scores 0.00 goals per game and allows 3.33. Åsane scores 2.00 and allows 4.00. Games in this league average 3.82 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 0% of Sogndal's games and 67% of Åsane's. The Over 2.5 rates are 100% and 100%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 82% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Sogndal has the higher season xG average, 1.49 to 1.24 per game. Sogndal takes 13.0 shots per game, while Åsane takes 10.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Sogndal leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.00 goals per game after halftime. Åsane leads at halftime in 33% and scores 1.33 after halftime.
When the teams score
Sogndal's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (0 goals). For Åsane, it is minutes 46-60 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
First Division games average 3.82 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 82% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Sogndal holds a clear advantage in chance creation: at home they average 18 shots and 9 on target per match, while Åsane average 11 shots and only 3 on target in away games. The difference in chance quality is confirmed by xG — Sogndal’s home xG is 2.27 versus 1.24 xG for Åsane on the road, suggesting a higher likelihood of goalscoring opportunities for the hosts. Both teams, however, have serious defensive issues: the hosts concede an average of 3 goals at home, and the visitors 4 away; in the last 5 matches Sogndal scored 4 and conceded 14, while Åsane scored 6 and conceded 15, indicating large defensive gaps. In terms of form Sogndal have 0.6 points per game over their last five (results: wllll), and Åsane only 0.2 points per game (ldlll), giving the hosts a slight mental edge. Considering the higher shot volume, superior xG (2.27 vs 1.24) and marginally better recent results, I predict a Sogndal win and assess the probabilities at 60% for the home side, 20% for a draw and 20% for an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I recommend BTTS - Yes (70%) vs No (30%) because the majority of key indicators point to goals at both ends. Sogndal has a seasonal BTTS of 100% vs Åsane 0%, but over the last 5 matches BTTS is 20% for Sogndal and 40% for Åsane, giving mixed historical signals. The stronger argument is recent defensive form: Sogndal conceded 14 goals in the last 5 matches (2.8 per match) and Åsane conceded 15 goals (3.0 per match), which increases the likelihood both teams are vulnerable to conceding. In attack Sogndal generates 1.65 xG in the last 5 matches and scored 4 goals, while Åsane has 0.93 xG and scored 6 goals in the same period, with xG against of 1.92 (Sogndal) and 1.80 (Åsane), so both sides create chances and pose threats. Additionally the league has BTTS at 55% and an average goals of 3.82, and season Over2.5 is 100% for both teams, therefore the stronger signal supports BTTS - Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG and statistics analysis indicates 1.78 expected goals for Sogndal and 1.50 for Åsane (total 3.28), calculated as (1.24 + 2.32)/2 = 1.78 for the home side and (1.24 + 1.76)/2 = 1.50 for the away side. This sits close to the league average of 3.82 goals per match, and both teams historically register a high share of multi-goal games — seasonOver25Percentage_home and seasonOver25Percentage_away are each 100%. A Poisson model with λ=3.28 yields roughly an 84% probability for Over 1.5 and about 64% for Over 2.5, while Over 3.5 performs weaker (~42%). Additionally, Sogndal averages 4.5 shots on target per match and has a high conversion rate of 32%, and both teams concede frequently (average 4.0 each), which increases the likelihood of further goals. In light of these figures the strongest play is Over at 2.5 due to the combination of the modelled ~64% probability and the season-long 100% Over 2.5 trend.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The data indicate a clear advantage for Sogndal at half-time: the home side led at the break in 50% of matches (leadingAtHTPercentage_home = 50.0), while Åsane were trailing at half-time in 100% of cases (trailingAtHTPercentage_away = 100.0). By half-time Sogndal score on average 1.0 goals (scoredAVGHT_home = 1.0) and Åsane 0.0 (scoredAVGHT_away = 0.0), while the away side concedes on average 3.0 goals before the break (concededAVGHT_away = 3.0), strongly suggesting the home team will have the lead after 45 minutes. Sogndal generates 1.24 xG per match (xg_for_avg_home = 1.24) and averages 4.5 shots on target (shotsOnTargetAVG_home = 4.5) versus 3.0 SOT for Åsane, with the home conversion rate at 32% compared to 0% for the visitors, so offensive efficiency favors Sogndal. In the last 5 matches the hosts won 20% of games (last5_winPercentage_overall_home = 20.0) while the visitors have 0% wins (last5_winPercentage_overall_away = 0.0) and the home side has accumulated 3.0 half-time points (HTPoints_home = 3.0), which further supports a full-time home victory. Considering these figures, the most likely scenario is 1/1 (Sogndal leading at half-time and winning the match).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Sogndal | Åsane | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.00 | 0.50 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sogndal is 20% better for: goals allowed per game.
3.33 goals / game - Sogndal · 4 goals / game - Åsane
Sogndal scores in 0% of games (0 of 3 meczów), while Åsane keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 meczów).
Åsane scores in 67% of games (2 of 3 meczów), while Sogndal keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Sogndal
Over / Under - Åsane
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Åsane is 203% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.33 pts / game - Sogndal · 1 pts / game - Åsane
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Sogndal - second-half results
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Åsane - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 0%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.7 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.33 | 0.33 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.7 | 1.7 |
| Average goals per game | 1.7 | 1.7 |
| 1 goal | 67% | 67% |
| 2 goals | 67% | 67% |
| 3 goals | 33% | 33% |
| Clean sheet | 33% | 33% |
| No goal | 100% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.33 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.7 | 1.3 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.7 | 2.3 |
| Average goals per game | 2.3 | 3.7 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 67% | 67% |
| 3 goals | 67% | 67% |
| Clean sheet | 33% | 0% |
| No goal | 33% | 33% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Sogndal
Åsane
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).
Teams vs league
| Sogndal | Liga | Åsane | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 3.33 | 3.82 | ▲ 6.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 0% | 55% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 100% | 82% | ▲ 100% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 23% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 77% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 86% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Sogndal's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 0 losses against Åsane. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Sogndal vs Åsane?
The First Division match finished Sogndal 2:0 Åsane. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Sogndal and Åsane?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Sogndal won 1, Åsane won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Sogndal vs Åsane?
Sogndal score 0.00 goals per game on average and Åsane 2.00. The First Division average is 3.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 82% of games. Both teams score in 0% of Sogndal's matches and 67% of Åsane's.
What form are Sogndal and Åsane in?
Over the last 5 games Sogndal have a 0-0-3 record (0.00 points per game) and Åsane 0-0-3 (0.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sogndal vs Åsane?
The statistical background for Sogndal vs Åsane — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.