Sogndal vs Egersund: match statistics
Sogndal vs Egersund: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Sogndal play Egersund in First Division (Norway). The match date is 27 June 2026 at 20:00. Venue: Fosshaugane Campus. Final score: 4:2.
Current form
Sogndal: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Egersund: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Sogndal scores 1.79 and concedes 2.57 goals per match. Egersund scores 1.71 and concedes 1.79. League average: 3.75 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Sogndal 64%, Egersund 50%. Over 2.5: Sogndal 86%, Egersund 79%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 73%.
xG, shots and style
Sogndal has higher xG: 1.77 vs 1.41. Sogndal: 15.4 shots per match, Egersund: 11.4.
Match halves
Sogndal: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.86. Egersund: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 0.79.
Goals by minute
Sogndal: 16-30 (6 goals). Egersund: 31-45+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
First Division: 3.75 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 73%.
Head-to-head
2 H2H matches: 1-0-1. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 0%.
Match description
I forecast a Sogndal win. At home Sogndal averages 17.2 shots per game, including 7 on target, has an xG of 2.01 and scores 2.2 goals per match, while Egersund away averages 10.2 shots, 4.2 on target, xG 1.33 and 1.6 goals. Egersund posts higher possession (57% vs 43%) and better shot conversion (16% vs 13%), but creates fewer chances, which favors the hosts. Both teams are vulnerable defensively: Sogndal concedes 2.0 goals at home with xG against 2.43, Egersund concedes 2.4 goals away with xG against 1.48, and in their last 5 matches both sides have conceded 13 goals each. Considering Sogndal’s superior shot volume and xG and Egersund’s poor away run (1 win, 4 losses), I assign a 60% probability to the home win, 25% to a draw and 15% to the away win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Sogndal | Egersund | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.44 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sogndal is 5% better for: goals scored per match.
1.79 goals / match - Sogndal · 1.71 goals / match - Egersund
Egersund is 44% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.57 goals / match - Sogndal · 1.79 goals / match - Egersund
Sogndal scores in 71% of matches (10 of 14 matches), while Egersund keeps a clean sheet in 36% (5 of 14 matches).
Egersund scores in 79% of matches (11 of 14 matches), while Sogndal keeps a clean sheet in 7% (1 of 14 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Sogndal
Over / Under — Egersund
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Egersund is 32% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.14 pts / match - Sogndal · 1.5 pts / match - Egersund
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Sogndal - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 29%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Egersund - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 3.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 80% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 0% |
| No goal | 0% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Average goals in match | 2.4 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Sogndal
Egersund
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).
Teams vs league
| Sogndal | Liga | Egersund | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 4.36 | 3.75 | ▼ 3.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 64% | 60% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 86% | 73% | ▲ 79% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 7% | 21% | ▲ 36% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 93% | 77% | ▲ 79% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 93% | 88% | ▼ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Sogndal 1 - 0 - 1 Egersund. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Sogndal vs Egersund?
The First Division match finished Sogndal 4:2 Egersund. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Sogndal and Egersund?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Sogndal won 1, Egersund won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Sogndal vs Egersund?
Sogndal score 1.79 goals per game on average and Egersund 1.71. The First Division average is 3.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 73% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Sogndal's matches and 50% of Egersund's.
What form are Sogndal and Egersund in?
Over the last 5 games Sogndal have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Egersund 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sogndal vs Egersund?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Sogndal vs Egersund: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.