Hungary - NB IIData current as of 23 July 2026

Soroksár SC vs Szeged 2011: match statistics

Soroksár SC crest
Soroksár SC
0 : 1half-time 0:1
Szeged 2011 crest
Szeged 2011
140%(0.00)
X35%(0.00)
225%(0.00)

Statistical analysis indicates evenly matched chances for both teams, with a slight advantage for the hosts. Although Soroksár SC sit lower in the table (16th place), they display better attacking efficiency at home (1.2 goals per game) than Szeged 2011 do on the road (0.7 goals per game). A key factor is the poor form of both teams - Soroksár have secured only 1 point in their last 5 matches, and Szeged a mere 2 points. Szeged have a disastrous away record with 60% of matches without scoring a goal and just a 10% win rate on the road. Considering Szeged's high away draw rate (40%) and the even ball possession (48% vs 49%), a sharing of the points is the most likely scenario, although the hosts could capitalize on their home advantage.

Soroksár SC vs Szeged 2011: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Soroksár SC play Szeged 2011 in NB II (Hungary). The match date is 14 March 2026 at 17:00. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Soroksár SC: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Szeged 2011: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Soroksár SC scores 1.33 and concedes 1.53 goals per match. Szeged 2011 scores 0.97 and concedes 1.13. League average: 2.51 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Soroksár SC 67%, Szeged 2011 33%. Over 2.5: Soroksár SC 63%, Szeged 2011 37%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 45%.

xG, shots and style

Szeged 2011 has higher xG: 1.46 vs 1.31. Soroksár SC: 10.4 shots per match, Szeged 2011: 10.9.

Match halves

Soroksár SC: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.73. Szeged 2011: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.60.

Goals by minute

Soroksár SC: 46-60 (8 goals). Szeged 2011: 46-60 (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

NB II: 2.51 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 45%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Statistical analysis indicates evenly matched chances for both teams, with a slight advantage for the hosts. Although Soroksár SC sit lower in the table (16th place), they display better attacking efficiency at home (1.2 goals per game) than Szeged 2011 do on the road (0.7 goals per game). A key factor is the poor form of both teams - Soroksár have secured only 1 point in their last 5 matches, and Szeged a mere 2 points. Szeged have a disastrous away record with 60% of matches without scoring a goal and just a 10% win rate on the road. Considering Szeged's high away draw rate (40%) and the even ball possession (48% vs 49%), a sharing of the points is the most likely scenario, although the hosts could capitalize on their home advantage.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

42Possession (%)58
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011
3Shots8
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011
0Shots on target3
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011
0.64xG1.18
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011
1Corners8
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011
60Dangerous attacks63
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011
-1Fouls-1
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011
-1Cards-1
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Soroksár SCSzeged 2011
1.33Goals scored / match0.97
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011
1.53Goals conceded / match1.13
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011
47%Average possession50%
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011
3.8Shots on target / match3.07
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.37Shots per match10.87
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011
3.8Shots on target3.07
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011
12.9%Shot conversion8.9%
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011
47%Possession50%
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011
1.31xG for1.46
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011
1.56xG against1.32
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011

Shooting quality

Soroksár SC: Counter-attackingSzeged 2011: Balanced
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011
Accuracy (shots on target)37%28%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Soroksár SC is 150% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Soroksár SC · 0.8 pts / match - Szeged 2011

Soroksár SC
WDWLW
Season result split
27% W30% R43% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-9-13
1.10 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-3-5
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
LWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.23Opponent xG: 1.37BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Szeged 2011
LLDWL
Season result split
30% W30% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-9-12
1.20 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-5-6
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WWDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.34Opponent xG: 1.06BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Soroksár SC is 37% better for: goals scored per match.

1.33 goals / match - Soroksár SC · 0.97 goals / match - Szeged 2011

Szeged 2011 is 35% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.53 goals / match - Soroksár SC · 1.13 goals / match - Szeged 2011

Soroksár SC scoring profile: strong

Soroksár SC scores in 73% of matches (22 of 30 matches), while Szeged 2011 keeps a clean sheet in 33% (10 of 30 matches).

Szeged 2011 scoring profile: strong

Szeged 2011 scores in 57% of matches (17 of 30 matches), while Soroksár SC keeps a clean sheet in 13% (4 of 30 matches).

40Goals scored (season)29
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011
46Goals conceded (season)34
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011
2.87Average goals in match2.1
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011
8Goals scored (last 5)3
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011
3Goals conceded (last 5)6
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal57%
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011
43%2 goals23%
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011
17%3 goals10%
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011
0%4 goals7%
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011

How often they concede at least...

87%1 goal67%
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011
43%2 goals27%
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011
13%3 goals13%
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011
3%4 goals7%
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

48%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time3%
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011
7%BTTS in both halves0%
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011
23%Scored in both halves10%
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011

BTTS and goal count

53%Min. 3 goals and BTTS17%
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS20%
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011
40%BTTS - last 50%
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

70%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011
27%Min. 2 goals before half-time13%
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011

2nd half

87%Min. 1 goal after half-time70%
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011
53%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011
23%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Soroksár SC is 44% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.4 pts / match - Soroksár SC · 0.97 pts / match - Szeged 2011

Soroksár SC - half-time state
33% leading40% draw27% trailing
Szeged 2011 - half-time state
20% leading37% draw43% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.4Points per match (1st half)0.97
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011
0.6Goals scored (1st half)0.37
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011
0.47Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011
1.07Average goals (1st half)0.87
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011
60%Clean sheet before half-time53%
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011
53%No goal before half-time77%
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011

After half-time (2nd half)

0.97Points per match (2nd half)1.4
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011
0.73Goals scored (2nd half)0.6
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011
1.07Goals conceded (2nd half)0.63
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011
1.8Average goals (2nd half)1.23
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011
30%Clean sheet after half-time60%
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011
50%No goal after half-time57%
Soroksár SCSzeged 2011

Soroksár SC - second-half results

20% W37% R43% P
42
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.40
PPG before half-time
Lead holding82%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 27%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Szeged 2011 - second-half results

33% W40% R27% P
29
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.97
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Soroksár SC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.60
Goals scored / match1.00.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match1.40.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+3+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
Szeged 2011 - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.80
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match0.61.2
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Soroksár SC
ScoredConceded
6
4
0-15
6
3
16-30
6
7
31-45
8
13
46-60
6
11
61-75
8
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Szeged 2011
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
3
5
16-30
6
7
31-45
10
3
46-60
3
6
61-75
5
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.48
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+21%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
42%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Soroksár SC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
131%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.90
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Szeged 2011

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.49
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
83%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
84%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NB II).

Teams vs league

Soroksár SCLigaSzeged 2011
Average goals in match 2.872.51 2.10
Both teams scored 67%48% 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 63%45% 37%
Clean sheets 13%29% 33%
Goal before half-time 70%70% 67%
Goal after half-time 87%80% 70%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.51
Average goals per match
48%
Both teams scored
45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.34
Home goals / match
1.17
Away goals / match
+15%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defence advantage
+13%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Soroksár SC 1 - 0 - 0 Szeged 2011. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Szeged 2011 FC
0 : 3
Soroksár Sport Club 1905

FAQ

What was the result of Soroksár SC vs Szeged 2011?

The NB II match finished Soroksár SC 0:1 Szeged 2011. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Soroksár SC vs Szeged 2011?

Soroksár SC score 1.33 goals per game on average and Szeged 2011 0.97. The NB II average is 2.51 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Soroksár SC's matches and 33% of Szeged 2011's.

What form are Soroksár SC and Szeged 2011 in?

Over the last 5 games Soroksár SC have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Szeged 2011 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Soroksár SC vs Szeged 2011?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Soroksár SC vs Szeged 2011: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.