Spartak Pleven vs Vihren Sandanski: match statistics
Spartak Pleven vs Vihren Sandanski: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Spartak Pleven played against Vihren Sandanski in Second League (Bulgaria). The game was played on August 30, 2026. Venue: Pleven Stadium. Final score: 0:2.
Recent form
Spartak Pleven has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Vihren Sandanski has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Spartak Pleven scores 1.20 goals per game and allows 1.40. Vihren Sandanski scores 1.80 and allows 1.20. Games in this league average 2.58 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 40% of Spartak Pleven's games and 80% of Vihren Sandanski's. The Over 2.5 rates are 60% and 40%, compared with league averages of 47% for BTTS and 43% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Vihren Sandanski has the higher season xG average, 1.67 to 1.46 per game. Spartak Pleven takes 12.2 shots per game, while Vihren Sandanski takes 13.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Spartak Pleven leads at halftime in 20% of its games and scores 0.80 goals per game after halftime. Vihren Sandanski leads at halftime in 60% and scores 1.20 after halftime.
When the teams score
Spartak Pleven's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (2 goals). For Vihren Sandanski, it is minutes 76-90+ (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Second League games average 2.58 goals. Both teams score in 47% of games, and 43% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Vihren Sandanski remain unbeaten after 5 league matches, recording 2 wins and 3 draws, while Spartak Pleven have a record of 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 defeats. The visitors are particularly strong away from home: they have won both of their matches so far, averaging 2.5 goals scored and failing to score in none of them. Spartak score just 1 goal per home match and failed to find the net in 50% of those fixtures, despite creating chances worth an average of 1.75 xG. The hosts have kept no clean sheets in any home match, which, combined with the visitors’ 24% conversion rate and their average of 2.5 goals away from home, points towards Vihren. The hosts take more shots, 15.5 compared to 10.5, but with an identical number of 3.5 shots on target, their 6% conversion rate is clearly inferior to the visitors’ efficiency.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The signal for goals from both sides is moderately positive: Spartak recorded BTTS in 100% of their matches so far, while Vihren did so in 50%, compared with the league average of 49%. The hosts have kept no clean sheets and concede an average of 1.33 goals, while the visitors score as many as 2.50 goals per match. Spartak creates plenty of chances, with an average xG of 1.94 and 7.67 shots on target, while Vihren’s defense allows an average of 1.42 xG. In their last five matches, Vihren recorded BTTS in 80% of cases, scoring 1.8 goals and conceding 1.2, which strengthens the expectation of goals from both sides. The risks to the pick are Vihren’s 50% clean-sheet rate this season and Spartak’s BTTS rate of only 40% in their last five matches; however, the hosts’ attacking advantage and Spartak’s poor defensive record support BTTS - Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Both teams have surpassed the 1.5-goal mark in 100% of their matches so far, providing a strong argument for an open game. Spartak average 1.33 goals scored and 1.33 conceded, while Vihren score as many as 2.50 goals per match and concede an average of 1.00. The hosts do, however, create more chances, with an average xG of 1.94 and 7.67 shots on target, while Vihren’s defensive xG stands at 1.42. In their last five matches, the teams averaged a combined 2.6 and 3.0 goals respectively, with Vihren scoring 1.8 times per game during this period. The projected 2.92 goals strongly support Over 1.5, whereas the 2.5 and 3.5 lines are more vulnerable to a low-scoring game scenario.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Vihren Sandanski demonstrate clearly superior scoring efficiency: they average 2.50 goals per match, have won 100% of their games so far, and record 3.00 points per match, compared with Spartak’s average of 1.00 point. The visitors led at the break in 2 of their 2 matches this season, scoring an average of 1.00 goal before half-time and conceding none, while the hosts have scored just 0.33 goals per match during this period. In their last five appearances, Vihren have not once been behind at half-time, leading in 60% of matches, whereas Spartak were trailing at half-time in 40% of cases. The hosts create more chances, as reflected by an xG of 1.94 compared with 1.26 and 7.67 shots on target compared with 3.50, but their conversion rate is only 8%, versus a very high 24% for the visitors. After the break, Vihren continue to average 1.50 goals, making the most likely scenario an HT/FT outcome in which they take the lead before half-time and maintain it until the final whistle.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Spartak Pleven | Vihren Sandanski | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 25% | 43% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.40 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Vihren Sandanski is 29% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Spartak Pleven · 1.8 pts / game - Vihren Sandanski
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Vihren Sandanski is 50% better for: goals scored per game.
1.2 goals / game - Spartak Pleven · 1.8 goals / game - Vihren Sandanski
Vihren Sandanski is 17% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.4 goals / game - Spartak Pleven · 1.2 goals / game - Vihren Sandanski
Spartak Pleven scores in 60% of games (3 of 5 games), while Vihren Sandanski keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 games).
Vihren Sandanski scores in 100% of games (5 of 5 games), while Spartak Pleven keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Spartak Pleven
Over / Under - Vihren Sandanski
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Vihren Sandanski is 120% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / game - Spartak Pleven · 2.2 pts / game - Vihren Sandanski
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Spartak Pleven - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Vihren Sandanski - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 60% of games and wins 40%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 1.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +3 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Spartak Pleven
Vihren Sandanski
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second League).
Teams vs league
| Spartak Pleven | Liga | Vihren Sandanski | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.60 | 2.58 | ▲ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 40% | 47% | ▲ 80% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 60% | 43% | ▼ 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 29% | ▼ 20% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 80% | 62% | ▼ 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 80% | 77% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Spartak Pleven's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses against Vihren Sandanski. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Spartak Pleven vs Vihren Sandanski?
The Second League match finished Spartak Pleven 0:2 Vihren Sandanski. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Spartak Pleven and Vihren Sandanski?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Spartak Pleven won 0, Vihren Sandanski won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Spartak Pleven vs Vihren Sandanski?
Spartak Pleven score 1.20 goals per game on average and Vihren Sandanski 1.80. The Second League average is 2.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 43% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Spartak Pleven's matches and 80% of Vihren Sandanski's.
What form are Spartak Pleven and Vihren Sandanski in?
Over the last 5 games Spartak Pleven have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Vihren Sandanski 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Spartak Pleven vs Vihren Sandanski?
The statistical background for Spartak Pleven vs Vihren Sandanski — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


