Spartak Trnava vs DAC: match statistics
Spartak Trnava vs DAC: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Spartak Trnava played against DAC in Super Liga (Slovakia). The game was played on April 22, 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Spartak Trnava has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. DAC has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Spartak Trnava scores 1.67 goals per game and allows 1.19. DAC scores 1.74 and allows 1.04. Games in this league average 2.84 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 41% of Spartak Trnava's games and 52% of DAC's. The Over 2.5 rates are 59% and 59%, compared with league averages of 53% for BTTS and 56% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
DAC has the higher season xG average, 1.89 to 1.64 per game. Spartak Trnava takes 15.2 shots per game, while DAC takes 17.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Spartak Trnava leads at halftime in 44% of its games and scores 0.81 goals per game after halftime. DAC leads at halftime in 44% and scores 0.85 after halftime.
When the teams score
Spartak Trnava's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (13 goals). For DAC, it is minutes 61-75 (13 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Super Liga games average 2.84 goals. Both teams score in 53% of games, and 56% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Spartak Trnava has a home edge: 58% possession and an average of 17.15 shots per match at home vs 53% possession and 14.69 shots for DAC away, with home xG 1.82 vs away 1.54. In the last 5 matches Spartak scored 10 goals (3 wins, 1 draw, 1 loss), while DAC scored 8 goals (3 wins, 2 losses), giving Trnava a short-term attacking advantage. Over the season DAC sits 2nd with 15 wins and a goal record of 47–28, versus 4th place and 14 wins for Spartak with a 45–32 record, indicating higher overall efficiency for the visitors. Spartak’s home defense looks solid: 1.00 goals conceded on average and xG against 1.11; hosts also have 62% home win rate and average 2 points per match in the last 5 games vs 1.8 for DAC. A high share of home clean sheets (38% vs 15% DAC) and better shot conversion for the visitors (12% vs 10%) reduce Trnava’s edge, so I forecast a home win but with a modest margin: 45% for Spartak, 25% draw, 30% for DAC.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I predict BTTS - Yes with a probability of 62% vs 38%. Spartak Trnava have a potent attack: 1.79 goals per game and xG 2.22, with 6.86 shots on target and 20.43 total shots, which against DAC’s defense (xG conceded 1.46 and 0.92 goals conceded per game) increases the hosts’ chance to score. DAC officially keep a clean sheet in 54% of matches this season (which lowers BTTS), but BTTS occurred in 60% of the visitors’ last 5 matches, with averages of 1.6 goals scored and 1.6 conceded. Spartak in their last 5 matches scored 10 goals (2.0 per game) and conceded 4 (0.8 per game), and the hosts’ season BTTS rate of 57% vs DAC’s 46% and the league BTTS level of 53% make the Both Teams To Score option appear stronger.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Statistical analysis indicates a clear goals advantage in this fixture. Spartak Trnava has xG 2.22 and scores an average of 1.79 goals per match, while DAC has xG 1.54 and averages 1.69 goals; defenses show xG against of 1.25 (Trnava) and 1.46 (DAC) respectively. Averaging home xG_for (2.22) with away xG_against (1.46) yields an expected ~1.84 goals for Trnava, and averaging away xG_for (1.54) with home xG_against (1.25) yields 1.40 goals for DAC, giving a combined total of 3.24 expected goals. Additionally, seasonal Over 1.5 rates are 93% for the home side and 69% for the away side (avg 81%), and seasonal Over 2.5 rates are 64% and 54% (avg 59%), which supports a strong over signal, particularly on the 1.5 line. Comparison of shots on target 6.86 (home) vs 4.69 (away) and BTTS rates 57% (home) vs 46% (away) further increase goal probability. Therefore the best line to play is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Half-time statistics indicate an advantage for DAC — the away side led at the break in 54% of matches versus 36% for Spartak, and the average points scored by half-time are 2.0 for DAC and 1.36 for the home side. The visitors also have 69% clean halves at the break compared to 50% for Spartak, suggesting they start matches safely. Nevertheless, Spartak shows a clear offensive advantage over the full 90 minutes: the home side’s xG is 2.22 versus 1.54 for the visitors, they average 20.43 shots compared to 14.69, and they score an average of 0.93 goals in the second half while winning 56% of second halves versus 23% for DAC. Additionally, the home team scored 6 goals in minutes 76–90 compared to 1 for the visitors, indicating strong finishing and potential for a turnaround. As a result, the strongest signal is the scenario where DAC lead at the break but Spartak win after the final whistle (HT/FT 2/1); I assign this scenario a 36% probability.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Spartak Trnava | DAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Spartak Trnava is 11% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Spartak Trnava · 1.8 pts / game - DAC
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
DAC is 14% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.19 goals / game - Spartak Trnava · 1.04 goals / game - DAC
Spartak Trnava scores in 74% of games (20 of 27 meczów), while DAC keeps a clean sheet in 41% (11 of 27 meczów).
DAC scores in 81% of games (22 of 27 meczów), while Spartak Trnava keeps a clean sheet in 37% (10 of 27 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Spartak Trnava
Over / Under - DAC
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
DAC is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.59 pts / game - Spartak Trnava · 1.67 pts / game - DAC
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Spartak Trnava - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 44% of games and wins 52%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
DAC - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 44% of games and wins 56%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (13 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Spartak Trnava
DAC
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super Liga).
Teams vs league
| Spartak Trnava | Liga | DAC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.85 | 2.84 | • 2.78 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 41% | 53% | • 52% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 59% | 56% | ▲ 59% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 37% | 27% | ▲ 41% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 81% | 74% | ▲ 81% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 63% | 74% | ▼ 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Spartak Trnava's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses against DAC. Games average 3.50 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Spartak Trnava vs DAC?
The Super Liga match finished Spartak Trnava 2:1 DAC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Spartak Trnava and DAC?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Spartak Trnava won 0, DAC won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Spartak Trnava vs DAC?
Spartak Trnava score 1.67 goals per game on average and DAC 1.74. The Super Liga average is 2.84 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 41% of Spartak Trnava's matches and 52% of DAC's.
What form are Spartak Trnava and DAC in?
Over the last 5 games Spartak Trnava have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and DAC 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Spartak Trnava vs DAC?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.