SSC Farul vs UTA Arad: match statistics
SSC Farul vs UTA Arad: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
SSC Farul played against UTA Arad in Liga I (Romania). The game was played on December 15, 2025. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
SSC Farul has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. UTA Arad has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.40 points per game.
Scoring records
SSC Farul scores 1.32 goals per game and allows 1.21. UTA Arad scores 1.21 and allows 1.47. Games in this league average 2.52 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 63% of SSC Farul's games and 58% of UTA Arad's. The Over 2.5 rates are 53% and 47%, compared with league averages of 52% for BTTS and 46% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
SSC Farul has the higher season xG average, 1.77 to 1.48 per game. SSC Farul takes 16.8 shots per game, while UTA Arad takes 13.5.
First-half and second-half trends
SSC Farul leads at halftime in 32% of its games and scores 0.63 goals per game after halftime. UTA Arad leads at halftime in 26% and scores 0.68 after halftime.
When the teams score
SSC Farul's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (6 goals). For UTA Arad, it is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Liga I games average 2.52 goals. Both teams score in 52% of games, and 46% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| SSC Farul | UTA Arad | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 27% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
UTA Arad is 71% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - SSC Farul · 2.4 pts / game - UTA Arad
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
SSC Farul is 9% better for: goals scored per game.
1.32 goals / game - SSC Farul · 1.21 goals / game - UTA Arad
SSC Farul is 21% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.21 goals / game - SSC Farul · 1.47 goals / game - UTA Arad
SSC Farul scores in 79% of games (15 of 19 meczów), while UTA Arad keeps a clean sheet in 21% (4 of 19 meczów).
UTA Arad scores in 74% of games (14 of 19 meczów), while SSC Farul keeps a clean sheet in 21% (4 of 19 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - SSC Farul
Over / Under - UTA Arad
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
UTA Arad is 9% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.16 pts / game - SSC Farul · 1.26 pts / game - UTA Arad
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
SSC Farul - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 32% of games and wins 37%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
UTA Arad - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 26% of games and wins 37%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 2.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
SSC Farul
UTA Arad
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga I).
Teams vs league
| SSC Farul | Liga | UTA Arad | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.53 | 2.52 | ▲ 2.68 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 63% | 52% | ▲ 58% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 53% | 46% | • 47% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 21% | 28% | ▼ 21% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 89% | 70% | ▼ 68% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 68% | 73% | ▲ 84% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from SSC Farul's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against UTA Arad. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of SSC Farul vs UTA Arad?
The Liga I match finished SSC Farul 1:1 UTA Arad. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before SSC Farul vs UTA Arad?
SSC Farul score 1.32 goals per game on average and UTA Arad 1.21. The Liga I average is 2.52 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 63% of SSC Farul's matches and 58% of UTA Arad's.
What form are SSC Farul and UTA Arad in?
Over the last 5 games SSC Farul have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and UTA Arad 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for SSC Farul vs UTA Arad?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.